From 62c92241a69cd4597650d8408744ff922ca34245 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xavier Leroy Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 16:05:56 +0200 Subject: Define integer sign extension for zero bits Just ensure sign_ext 0 x = zero. This simplifies some statements and proofs. --- lib/Integers.v | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/Integers.v') diff --git a/lib/Integers.v b/lib/Integers.v index f4213332..1b0375b1 100644 --- a/lib/Integers.v +++ b/lib/Integers.v @@ -1139,6 +1139,12 @@ Proof. intros. apply Ztestbit_above with wordsize; auto. apply unsigned_range. Qed. +Lemma bits_below: + forall x i, i < 0 -> testbit x i = false. +Proof. + intros. apply Z.testbit_neg_r; auto. +Qed. + Lemma bits_zero: forall i, testbit zero i = false. Proof. @@ -2511,12 +2517,11 @@ Proof. Qed. Lemma bits_sign_ext: - forall n x i, 0 <= i < zwordsize -> 0 < n -> + forall n x i, 0 <= i < zwordsize -> testbit (sign_ext n x) i = testbit x (if zlt i n then i else n - 1). Proof. intros. unfold sign_ext. - rewrite testbit_repr; auto. rewrite Zsign_ext_spec. destruct (zlt i n); auto. - omega. auto. + rewrite testbit_repr; auto. apply Zsign_ext_spec. omega. Qed. Hint Rewrite bits_zero_ext bits_sign_ext: ints. @@ -2528,12 +2533,24 @@ Proof. rewrite bits_zero_ext. apply zlt_true. omega. omega. Qed. +Theorem zero_ext_below: + forall n x, n <= 0 -> zero_ext n x = zero. +Proof. + intros. bit_solve. destruct (zlt i n); auto. apply bits_below; omega. omega. +Qed. + Theorem sign_ext_above: forall n x, n >= zwordsize -> sign_ext n x = x. Proof. intros. apply same_bits_eq; intros. unfold sign_ext; rewrite testbit_repr; auto. - rewrite Zsign_ext_spec. rewrite zlt_true. auto. omega. omega. omega. + rewrite Zsign_ext_spec. rewrite zlt_true. auto. omega. omega. +Qed. + +Theorem sign_ext_below: + forall n x, n <= 0 -> sign_ext n x = zero. +Proof. + intros. bit_solve. apply bits_below. destruct (zlt i n); omega. Qed. Theorem zero_ext_and: @@ -2570,7 +2587,7 @@ Proof. Qed. Theorem sign_ext_widen: - forall x n n', 0 < n <= n' -> + forall x n n', 0 < n <= n' -> sign_ext n' (sign_ext n x) = sign_ext n x. Proof. intros. destruct (zlt n' zwordsize). @@ -2578,9 +2595,8 @@ Proof. auto. rewrite (zlt_false _ i n). destruct (zlt (n' - 1) n); f_equal; omega. - omega. omega. + omega. destruct (zlt i n'); omega. - omega. omega. apply sign_ext_above; auto. Qed. @@ -2594,7 +2610,6 @@ Proof. auto. rewrite !zlt_false. auto. omega. omega. omega. destruct (zlt i n'); omega. - omega. apply sign_ext_above; auto. Qed. @@ -2614,9 +2629,7 @@ Theorem sign_ext_narrow: Proof. intros. destruct (zlt n zwordsize). bit_solve. destruct (zlt i n); f_equal; apply zlt_true; omega. - omega. destruct (zlt i n); omega. - omega. omega. rewrite (sign_ext_above n'). auto. omega. Qed. @@ -2628,7 +2641,7 @@ Proof. bit_solve. destruct (zlt i n); auto. rewrite zlt_true; auto. omega. - omega. omega. omega. + omega. omega. rewrite sign_ext_above; auto. Qed. @@ -2643,7 +2656,7 @@ Theorem sign_ext_idem: Proof. intros. apply sign_ext_widen. omega. Qed. - + Theorem sign_ext_zero_ext: forall n x, 0 < n -> sign_ext n (zero_ext n x) = sign_ext n x. Proof. @@ -2706,7 +2719,7 @@ Proof. rewrite zlt_true. rewrite bits_shl. rewrite zlt_false. f_equal. omega. omega. omega. omega. rewrite zlt_false. rewrite bits_shl. rewrite zlt_false. f_equal. omega. - omega. omega. omega. omega. omega. + omega. omega. omega. omega. Qed. (** [zero_ext n x] is the unique integer congruent to [x] modulo [2^n] @@ -2766,7 +2779,7 @@ Proof. apply eqmod_same_bits; intros. rewrite H0 in H1. rewrite H0. fold (testbit (sign_ext n x) i). rewrite bits_sign_ext. - rewrite zlt_true. auto. omega. omega. omega. + rewrite zlt_true. auto. omega. omega. Qed. Lemma eqmod_sign_ext: -- cgit