From b16f3242909e90bdb547ab1500d46f5e38527981 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Wickerson <j.wickerson@imperial.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:20:10 +0000
Subject: Update on Overleaf.

---
 eval.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'eval.tex')

diff --git a/eval.tex b/eval.tex
index 46b58a0..e17d955 100644
--- a/eval.tex
+++ b/eval.tex
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ We see that 918 (13.7\%), 167 (2.5\%), 83 (1.2\%) and 26 (0.4\%) test-cases fail
 Despite i++ having the lowest failure rate, it has the highest time-out rate (540 test-cases), because of its remarkably long compilation time.
 % We remark that although the Intel HLS Compiler had the smallest number of confirmed test-case failures, it had the most time-outs (which could be masking additional failures)  
 Note that the absolute numbers here do not necessarily correspond to the number of bugs in the tools, because a single bug in a language feature that appears frequently in our test suite could cause many programs to crash or fail.
-Hence, we reduce many of the failing test-cases in an effort to identify unique bugs; these are summarised in the table below.
+Hence, we reduce many of the failing test-cases in an effort to identify unique bugs; these are summarised in the table below.\footnote{Link to detailed bug reports available from PC Chair.}
 
 \begin{table}[h]
 \centering
-- 
cgit 

