diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'aarch64/PostpassSchedulingproof.v')
-rw-r--r-- | aarch64/PostpassSchedulingproof.v | 482 |
1 files changed, 482 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/aarch64/PostpassSchedulingproof.v b/aarch64/PostpassSchedulingproof.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a5084b5f --- /dev/null +++ b/aarch64/PostpassSchedulingproof.v @@ -0,0 +1,482 @@ +(* *************************************************************) +(* *) +(* The Compcert verified compiler *) +(* *) +(* Sylvain Boulmé Grenoble-INP, VERIMAG *) +(* David Monniaux CNRS, VERIMAG *) +(* Cyril Six Kalray *) +(* Léo Gourdin UGA, VERIMAG *) +(* *) +(* Copyright Kalray. Copyright VERIMAG. All rights reserved. *) +(* This file is distributed under the terms of the INRIA *) +(* Non-Commercial License Agreement. *) +(* *) +(* *************************************************************) + +Require Import Coqlib Errors. +Require Import Integers Floats AST Linking. +Require Import Values Memory Events Globalenvs Smallstep. +Require Import Op Locations Machblock Conventions Asmblock. +Require Import Asmblockprops. +Require Import PostpassScheduling. +Require Import Asmblockgenproof. +Require Import Axioms. +Require Import Lia. + +Local Open Scope error_monad_scope. + +Definition match_prog (p tp: program) := + match_program (fun _ f tf => transf_fundef f = OK tf) eq p tp. + +Lemma transf_program_match: + forall p tp, transf_program p = OK tp -> match_prog p tp. +Proof. + intros. eapply match_transform_partial_program; eauto. +Qed. + +Section PRESERVATION_ASMBLOCK. + +Variables prog tprog: program. +Variable lk: aarch64_linker. +Hypothesis TRANSL: match_prog prog tprog. +Let ge := Genv.globalenv prog. +Let tge := Genv.globalenv tprog. + +Lemma symbols_preserved: + forall id, + Genv.find_symbol tge id = Genv.find_symbol ge id. +Proof (Genv.find_symbol_match TRANSL). + +Lemma senv_preserved: + Senv.equiv ge tge. +Proof (Genv.senv_match TRANSL). + +Lemma function_ptr_translated: + forall v f, + Genv.find_funct_ptr ge v = Some f -> + exists tf, + Genv.find_funct_ptr tge v = Some tf /\ transf_fundef f = OK tf. +Proof (Genv.find_funct_ptr_transf_partial TRANSL). + +Inductive match_states: state -> state -> Prop := + | match_states_intro: + forall s1 s2, s1 = s2 -> match_states s1 s2. + +Lemma prog_main_preserved: + prog_main tprog = prog_main prog. +Proof (match_program_main TRANSL). + +Lemma prog_main_address_preserved: + (Genv.symbol_address (Genv.globalenv prog) (prog_main prog) Ptrofs.zero) = + (Genv.symbol_address (Genv.globalenv tprog) (prog_main tprog) Ptrofs.zero). +Proof. + unfold Genv.symbol_address. rewrite symbols_preserved. + rewrite prog_main_preserved. auto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_initial_states: + forall st1, initial_state prog st1 -> + exists st2, initial_state tprog st2 /\ match_states st1 st2. +Proof. + intros. inv H. + econstructor; split. + - eapply initial_state_intro. + eapply (Genv.init_mem_transf_partial TRANSL); eauto. + - econstructor; eauto. subst ge0. subst rs0. rewrite prog_main_address_preserved. auto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_final_states: + forall st1 st2 r, + match_states st1 st2 -> final_state st1 r -> final_state st2 r. +Proof. + intros. inv H0. inv H. econstructor; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_find_bblock: + forall ofs f bb tf, + find_bblock (Ptrofs.unsigned ofs) (fn_blocks f) = Some bb -> + transf_function f = OK tf -> + exists tbb, + verified_schedule bb = OK tbb + /\ find_bblock (Ptrofs.unsigned ofs) (fn_blocks tf) = Some tbb. +Proof. + intros. + monadInv H0. destruct (zlt Ptrofs.max_unsigned (size_blocks (fn_blocks x))); try (inv EQ0; fail). inv EQ0. + monadInv EQ. simpl in *. + generalize (Ptrofs.unsigned ofs) H x EQ0; clear ofs H x g EQ0. + induction (fn_blocks f). + - intros. simpl in *. discriminate. + - intros. simpl in *. + monadInv EQ0. simpl. + destruct (zlt z 0); try discriminate. + destruct (zeq z 0). + + inv H. eauto. + + monadInv EQ0. + exploit IHb; eauto. + intros (tbb & SCH & FIND). + eexists; split; eauto. + inv FIND. + unfold verify_size in EQ0. + destruct (size a =? size (stick_header (header a) x)) eqn:EQSIZE; try discriminate. + rewrite Z.eqb_eq in EQSIZE; rewrite EQSIZE. + reflexivity. +Qed. + +Lemma stick_header_neutral: forall a, + a = (stick_header (header a) (no_header a)). +Proof. + intros. + unfold stick_header. unfold Asmblock.stick_header_obligation_1. simpl. destruct a. + simpl. reflexivity. +Qed. + +Lemma symbol_address_preserved: + forall l ofs, Genv.symbol_address ge l ofs = Genv.symbol_address tge l ofs. +Proof. + intros. unfold Genv.symbol_address. repeat (rewrite symbols_preserved). reflexivity. +Qed. + +Lemma verified_schedule_label: + forall bb tbb l, + verified_schedule bb = OK (tbb) -> + is_label l bb = is_label l tbb. +Proof. + intros. + unfold is_label. + monadInv H. simpl. auto. +Qed. + +Remark label_pos_pvar_none_add: + forall tc l p p' k, + label_pos l (p+k) tc = None -> label_pos l (p'+k) tc = None. +Proof. + induction tc. + - intros. simpl. auto. + - intros. simpl in *. destruct (is_label _ _) eqn:ISLBL. + + discriminate. + + pose (IHtc l p p' (k + size a)). repeat (rewrite Z.add_assoc in e). auto. +Qed. + +Lemma label_pos_pvar_none: + forall tc l p p', + label_pos l p tc = None -> label_pos l p' tc = None. +Proof. + intros. rewrite (Zplus_0_r_reverse p') at 1. rewrite (Zplus_0_r_reverse p) in H at 1. + eapply label_pos_pvar_none_add; eauto. +Qed. + +Remark label_pos_pvar_some_add_add: + forall tc l p p' k k', + label_pos l (p+k') tc = Some (p+k) -> label_pos l (p'+k') tc = Some (p'+k). +Proof. + induction tc. + - intros. simpl in H. discriminate. + - intros. simpl in *. destruct (is_label _ _) eqn:ISLBL. + + inv H. assert (k = k') by lia. subst. reflexivity. + + pose (IHtc l p p' k (k' + size a)). repeat (rewrite Z.add_assoc in e). auto. +Qed. + +Lemma label_pos_pvar_some_add: + forall tc l p p' k, + label_pos l p tc = Some (p+k) -> label_pos l p' tc = Some (p'+k). +Proof. + intros. rewrite (Zplus_0_r_reverse p') at 1. rewrite (Zplus_0_r_reverse p) in H at 1. + eapply label_pos_pvar_some_add_add; eauto. +Qed. + +Remark label_pos_pvar_add: + forall c tc l p p' k, + label_pos l (p+k) c = label_pos l p tc -> + label_pos l (p'+k) c = label_pos l p' tc. +Proof. + induction c. + - intros. simpl in *. + exploit label_pos_pvar_none; eauto. + - intros. simpl in *. destruct (is_label _ _) eqn:ISLBL. + + exploit label_pos_pvar_some_add; eauto. + + pose (IHc tc l p p' (k+size a)). repeat (rewrite Z.add_assoc in e). auto. +Qed. + +Lemma label_pos_pvar: + forall c tc l p p', + label_pos l p c = label_pos l p tc -> + label_pos l p' c = label_pos l p' tc. +Proof. + intros. rewrite (Zplus_0_r_reverse p') at 1. rewrite (Zplus_0_r_reverse p) in H at 1. + eapply label_pos_pvar_add; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma label_pos_head_cons: + forall c bb tbb l tc p, + verified_schedule bb = OK tbb -> + label_pos l p c = label_pos l p tc -> + label_pos l p (bb :: c) = label_pos l p (tbb :: tc). +Proof. + intros. simpl. + exploit verified_schedule_label; eauto. intros ISLBL. + rewrite ISLBL. + destruct (is_label l tbb) eqn:ISLBL'; simpl; auto. + eapply label_pos_pvar in H0. erewrite H0. + erewrite verified_schedule_size; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma label_pos_preserved: + forall c tc l, + transf_blocks c = OK tc -> label_pos l 0 c = label_pos l 0 tc. +Proof. + induction c. + - intros. simpl in *. inv H. reflexivity. + - intros. unfold transf_blocks in H; fold transf_blocks in H. monadInv H. + eapply IHc in EQ. eapply label_pos_head_cons; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma label_pos_preserved_blocks: + forall l f tf, + transf_function f = OK tf -> + label_pos l 0 (fn_blocks f) = label_pos l 0 (fn_blocks tf). +Proof. + intros. monadInv H. monadInv EQ. + destruct (zlt Ptrofs.max_unsigned _); try discriminate. + monadInv EQ0. simpl. eapply label_pos_preserved; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_exec_basic: + forall i rs m, exec_basic lk ge i rs m = exec_basic lk tge i rs m. +Proof. + intros. pose symbol_address_preserved. + unfold exec_basic. + destruct i; simpl; auto; try congruence. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_exec_body: + forall bdy rs m, exec_body lk ge bdy rs m = exec_body lk tge bdy rs m. +Proof. + induction bdy; intros. + - simpl. reflexivity. + - simpl. rewrite transf_exec_basic. + destruct (exec_basic _ _ _); auto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_exec_cfi: forall f tf cfi rs m, + transf_function f = OK tf -> + exec_cfi ge f cfi rs m = exec_cfi tge tf cfi rs m. +Proof. + intros. destruct cfi; simpl; auto; + assert (ge = Genv.globalenv prog); auto; + assert (tge = Genv.globalenv tprog); auto; + pose symbol_address_preserved. + all: try unfold eval_branch; try unfold eval_neg_branch; try unfold goto_label; + try erewrite label_pos_preserved_blocks; try rewrite e; eauto. + destruct (rs # X16 <- Vundef r1); auto. + destruct (list_nth_z tbl (Int.unsigned i)); auto. + erewrite label_pos_preserved_blocks; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_exec_exit: + forall f tf sz ex t rs m rs' m', + transf_function f = OK tf -> + exec_exit ge f sz rs m ex t rs' m' -> + exec_exit tge tf sz rs m ex t rs' m'. +Proof. + intros. induction H0. + - econstructor. + - econstructor. erewrite <- transf_exec_cfi; eauto. + - econstructor; eauto. + eapply eval_builtin_args_preserved with (ge1 := ge); eauto. exact symbols_preserved. + eapply external_call_symbols_preserved; eauto. apply senv_preserved. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_exec_bblock: + forall f tf bb t rs m rs' m', + transf_function f = OK tf -> + exec_bblock lk ge f bb rs m t rs' m' -> + exec_bblock lk tge tf bb rs m t rs' m'. +Proof. + intros. + destruct H0 as [rs1[m1[BDY EXIT]]]. + unfold exec_bblock. + eexists; eexists; split. + rewrite <- transf_exec_body; eauto. + eapply transf_exec_exit; eauto. +Qed. + +Theorem transf_step_correct: + forall s1 t s2, step lk ge s1 t s2 -> + forall s1' (MS: match_states s1 s1'), + (exists s2', step lk tge s1' t s2' /\ match_states s2 s2'). +Proof. + induction 1; intros; inv MS. + - exploit function_ptr_translated; eauto. intros (tf & FFP & TRANSF). monadInv TRANSF. + exploit transf_find_bblock; eauto. intros (tbb & VES & FIND). + exploit verified_schedule_correct; eauto. intros EBB. + eapply transf_exec_bblock in EBB; eauto. + exists (State rs' m'). + split; try (econstructor; eauto). + - exploit function_ptr_translated; eauto. intros (tf & FFP & TRANSF). monadInv TRANSF. + remember (State _ m') as s'. exists s'. split; try constructor; auto. + subst s'. eapply exec_step_external; eauto. + eapply external_call_symbols_preserved; eauto. apply senv_preserved. +Qed. + +Theorem transf_program_correct_Asmblock: + forward_simulation (Asmblock.semantics lk prog) (Asmblock.semantics lk tprog). +Proof. + eapply forward_simulation_step. + - apply senv_preserved. + - apply transf_initial_states. + - apply transf_final_states. + - apply transf_step_correct. +Qed. + +End PRESERVATION_ASMBLOCK. + +(* +Require Import Asm. + +Lemma verified_par_checks_alls_bundles lb x: forall bundle, + verify_par lb = OK x -> + List.In bundle lb -> verify_par_bblock bundle = OK tt. +Proof. + induction lb; simpl; try tauto. + intros bundle H; monadInv H. + destruct 1; subst; eauto. + destruct x0; auto. +Qed. + +Lemma verified_schedule_nob_checks_alls_bundles bb lb bundle: + verified_schedule_nob bb = OK lb -> + List.In bundle lb -> verify_par_bblock bundle = OK tt. +Proof. + unfold verified_schedule_nob. intros H; + monadInv H. destruct x4. + intros; eapply verified_par_checks_alls_bundles; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma verify_par_bblock_PExpand bb i: + exit bb = Some (PExpand i) -> verify_par_bblock bb = OK tt. +Proof. + destruct bb as [h bdy ext H]; simpl. + intros; subst. destruct i. + generalize H. + rewrite <- wf_bblock_refl in H. + destruct H as [H H0]. + unfold builtin_alone in H0. erewrite H0; eauto. +Qed. + +Local Hint Resolve verified_schedule_nob_checks_alls_bundles: core. + +Lemma verified_schedule_checks_alls_bundles bb lb bundle: + verified_schedule bb = OK lb -> + List.In bundle lb -> verify_par_bblock bundle = OK tt. +Proof. + unfold verified_schedule. remember (exit bb) as exb. + destruct exb as [c|]; eauto. + destruct c as [i|]; eauto. + destruct i; intros H. inversion_clear H; simpl. + intuition subst. + intros; eapply verify_par_bblock_PExpand; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma transf_blocks_checks_all_bundles lbb: forall lb bundle, + transf_blocks lbb = OK lb -> + List.In bundle lb -> verify_par_bblock bundle = OK tt. +Proof. + induction lbb; simpl. + - intros lb bundle H; inversion_clear H. simpl; try tauto. + - intros lb bundle H0. + monadInv H0. + rewrite in_app. destruct 1; eauto. + eapply verified_schedule_checks_alls_bundles; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma find_bblock_Some_in lb: + forall ofs b, find_bblock ofs lb = Some b -> List.In b lb. +Proof. + induction lb; simpl; try congruence. + intros ofs b. + destruct (zlt ofs 0); try congruence. + destruct (zeq ofs 0); eauto. + intros X; inversion X; eauto. +Qed.*) + +(* +Section PRESERVATION_ASMVLIW. + +Variables prog tprog: program. +Hypothesis TRANSL: match_prog prog tprog. +Let ge := Genv.globalenv prog. +Let tge := Genv.globalenv tprog. + +Lemma all_bundles_are_checked b ofs f bundle: + Genv.find_funct_ptr (globalenv (Asmblock.semantics tprog)) b = Some (Internal f) -> + find_bblock ofs (fn_blocks f) = Some bundle -> + verify_par_bblock bundle = OK tt. +Proof. + unfold match_prog, match_program in TRANSL. + unfold Genv.find_funct_ptr; simpl; intros X. + destruct (Genv.find_def_match_2 TRANSL b) as [|f0 y H]; try congruence. + destruct y as [tf0|]; try congruence. + inversion X as [H1]. subst. clear X. + remember (@Gfun fundef unit (Internal f)) as f2. + destruct H as [ctx' f1 f2 H0|]; try congruence. + inversion Heqf2 as [H2]. subst; clear Heqf2. + unfold transf_fundef, transf_partial_fundef in H. + destruct f1 as [f1|f1]; try congruence. + unfold transf_function, transl_function in H. + monadInv H. monadInv EQ. + destruct (zlt Ptrofs.max_unsigned (size_blocks (fn_blocks _))); simpl in *|-; try congruence. + injection EQ1; intros; subst. + monadInv EQ0. simpl in * |-. + intros; exploit transf_blocks_checks_all_bundles; eauto. + intros; eapply find_bblock_Some_in; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma checked_bundles_are_parexec_equiv f bundle rs rs' m m': + exec_bblock (globalenv (Asmblock.semantics tprog)) f bundle rs m = Next rs' m' -> + verify_par_bblock bundle = OK tt -> + det_parexec (globalenv (semantics tprog)) f bundle rs m rs' m'. +Proof. + intros. unfold verify_par_bblock in H0. destruct (Asmblockdeps.bblock_para_check _) eqn:BPC; try discriminate. clear H0. + simpl in H. + eapply Asmblockdeps.bblock_para_check_correct; eauto. +Qed. + +Lemma seqexec_parexec_equiv b ofs f bundle rs rs' m m': + Genv.find_funct_ptr (globalenv (Asmblock.semantics tprog)) b = Some (Internal f) -> + find_bblock (Ptrofs.unsigned ofs) (fn_blocks f) = Some bundle -> + exec_bblock (globalenv (Asmblock.semantics tprog)) f bundle rs m = Next rs' m' -> + det_parexec (globalenv (semantics tprog)) f bundle rs m rs' m'. +Proof. + intros; eapply checked_bundles_are_parexec_equiv; eauto. + eapply all_bundles_are_checked; eauto. +Qed. + +Theorem transf_program_correct_Asmvliw: + forward_simulation (Asmblock.semantics tprog) (Asmvliw.semantics tprog). +Proof. + eapply forward_simulation_step with (match_states:=fun (s1:Asmvliw.state) s2 => s1=s2); eauto. + - intros; subst; auto. + - intros s1 t s1' H s2 H0; subst; inversion H; clear H; subst; eexists; split; eauto. + + eapply exec_step_internal; eauto. + intros; eapply seqexec_parexec_equiv; eauto. + + eapply exec_step_builtin; eauto. + + eapply exec_step_external; eauto. +Qed. + +End PRESERVATION_ASMVLIW.*) + +Section PRESERVATION. + +Variable lk: aarch64_linker. +Variables prog tprog: program. +Hypothesis TRANSL: match_prog prog tprog. +Let ge := Genv.globalenv prog. +Let tge := Genv.globalenv tprog. + +Theorem transf_program_correct: + forward_simulation (Asmblock.semantics lk prog) (Asmblock.semantics lk tprog). +Proof. + eapply transf_program_correct_Asmblock; eauto. +Qed. + +End PRESERVATION. |