| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The GPL makes sense for whole applications, but the dual-licensed Coq
and OCaml files are more like libraries to be combined with other
code, so the LGPL is more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also corrected some typos and corrected exception handling for
expandargv.
Bug 18308
|
|
The functions expandargv and writeargv resemble the functions from
the libiberity that are used by the gnu tools. Additionaly a new
configuration is added in order to determine which kind of response
files are supported for calls to other tools.
Bug 18308
|