path: root/riscV/SelectOpproof.v

(* *********************************************************************)
(*                                                                     *)
(*              The Compcert verified compiler                         *)
(*                                                                     *)
(*          Xavier Leroy, INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt                     *)
(*           Prashanth Mundkur, SRI International                      *)
(*                                                                     *)
(*  Copyright Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en     *)
(*  Automatique.  All rights reserved.  This file is distributed       *)
(*  under the terms of the INRIA Non-Commercial License Agreement.     *)
(*                                                                     *)
(*  The contributions by Prashanth Mundkur are reused and adapted      *)
(*  under the terms of a Contributor License Agreement between         *)
(*  SRI International and INRIA.                                       *)
(*                                                                     *)
(* *********************************************************************)

(** Correctness of instruction selection for operators *)

Require Import Coqlib Zbits.
Require Import AST Integers Floats.
Require Import Values Memory Builtins Globalenvs.
Require Import Cminor Op CminorSel.
Require Import SelectOp.

Local Open Scope cminorsel_scope.

(** * Useful lemmas and tactics *)

(** The following are trivial lemmas and custom tactics that help
  perform backward (inversion) and forward reasoning over the evaluation
  of operator applications. *)

Ltac EvalOp := eapply eval_Eop; eauto with evalexpr.

Ltac InvEval1 :=
  match goal with
  | [ H: (eval_expr _ _ _ _ _ (Eop _ Enil) _) |- _ ] =>
      inv H; InvEval1
  | [ H: (eval_expr _ _ _ _ _ (Eop _ (_ ::: Enil)) _) |- _ ] =>
      inv H; InvEval1
  | [ H: (eval_expr _ _ _ _ _ (Eop _ (_ ::: _ ::: Enil)) _) |- _ ] =>
      inv H; InvEval1
  | [ H: (eval_exprlist _ _ _ _ _ Enil _) |- _ ] =>
      inv H; InvEval1
  | [ H: (eval_exprlist _ _ _ _ _ (_ ::: _) _) |- _ ] =>
      inv H; InvEval1
  | _ =>
      idtac
  end.

Ltac InvEval2 :=
  match goal with
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ nil _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; inv H
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ (_ :: nil) _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; FuncInv
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ (_ :: _ :: nil) _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; FuncInv
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ (_ :: _ :: _ :: nil) _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; FuncInv
  | _ =>
      idtac
  end.

Ltac InvEval := InvEval1; InvEval2; InvEval2.

Ltac TrivialExists :=
  match goal with
  | [ |- exists v, _ /\ Val.lessdef ?a v ] => exists a; split; [EvalOp | auto]
  end.

(** * Correctness of the smart constructors *)

Section CMCONSTR.

Variable ge: genv.
Variable sp: val.
Variable e: env.
Variable m: mem.

(** We now show that the code generated by "smart constructor" functions
  such as [Selection.notint] behaves as expected.  Continuing the
  [notint] example, we show that if the expression [e]
  evaluates to some integer value [Vint n], then [Selection.notint e]
  evaluates to a value [Vint (Int.not n)] which is indeed the integer
  negation of the value of [e].

  All proofs follow a common pattern:
- Reasoning by case over the result of the classification functions
  (such as [add_match] for integer addition), gathering additional
  information on the shape of the argument expressions in the non-default
  cases.
- Inversion of the evaluations of the arguments, exploiting the additional
  information thus gathered.
- Equational reasoning over the arithmetic operations performed,
  using the lemmas from the [Int] and [Float] modules.
- Construction of an evaluation derivation for the expression returned
  by the smart constructor.
*)

Definition unary_constructor_sound (cstr: expr -> expr) (sem: val -> val) : Prop :=
  forall le a x,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (cstr a) v /\ Val.lessdef (sem x) v.

Definition binary_constructor_sound (cstr: expr -> expr -> expr) (sem: val -> val -> val) : Prop :=
  forall le a x b y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (cstr a b) v /\ Val.lessdef (sem x y) v.

Theorem eval_addrsymbol:
  forall le id ofs,
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (addrsymbol id ofs) v /\ Val.lessdef (Genv.symbol_address ge id ofs) v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold addrsymbol. econstructor; split.
  EvalOp. simpl; eauto.
  auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_addrstack:
  forall le ofs,
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (addrstack ofs) v /\ Val.lessdef (Val.offset_ptr sp ofs) v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold addrstack. econstructor; split.
  EvalOp. simpl; eauto.
  auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_addimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (addimm n) (fun x => Val.add x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  red; unfold addimm; intros until x.
  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  - subst n. intros. exists x; split; auto.
    destruct x; simpl; auto.
    rewrite Int.add_zero; auto.
    destruct Archi.ptr64; auto. rewrite Ptrofs.add_zero; auto. 
  - case (addimm_match a); intros; InvEval; simpl.
    + TrivialExists; simpl. rewrite Int.add_commut. auto.
    + econstructor; split. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. 
      unfold Genv.symbol_address. destruct (Genv.find_symbol ge s); simpl; auto.
      destruct Archi.ptr64; auto. rewrite Ptrofs.add_commut; auto.
    + econstructor; split. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. 
      destruct sp; simpl; auto. destruct Archi.ptr64; auto. 
      rewrite Ptrofs.add_assoc. rewrite (Ptrofs.add_commut m0). auto.
    + TrivialExists; simpl. subst x. rewrite Val.add_assoc. rewrite Int.add_commut. auto.
    + TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_add: binary_constructor_sound add Val.add.
Proof.
  red; intros until y.
  unfold add; case (add_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  - rewrite Val.add_commut. apply eval_addimm; auto.
  - apply eval_addimm; auto.
  - subst.
    replace (Val.add (Val.add v1 (Vint n1)) (Val.add v0 (Vint n2)))
       with (Val.add (Val.add v1 v0) (Val.add (Vint n1) (Vint n2))).
    apply eval_addimm. EvalOp.
    repeat rewrite Val.add_assoc. decEq. apply Val.add_permut.
  - subst. econstructor; split.
    EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor. eauto. constructor. simpl; eauto.
    rewrite Val.add_commut. destruct sp; simpl; auto.
    destruct v1; simpl; auto.
    destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF; auto. 
    apply Val.lessdef_same. f_equal. rewrite ! Ptrofs.add_assoc. f_equal. 
    rewrite (Ptrofs.add_commut (Ptrofs.of_int n1)), Ptrofs.add_assoc. f_equal. auto with ptrofs.
    destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF; auto.
  - subst. econstructor; split.
    EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor. eauto. constructor. simpl; eauto.
    destruct sp; simpl; auto.
    destruct v1; simpl; auto.
    destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF; auto. 
    apply Val.lessdef_same. f_equal. rewrite ! Ptrofs.add_assoc. f_equal. f_equal.
    rewrite Ptrofs.add_commut. auto with ptrofs.
    destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF; auto.
  - subst.
    replace (Val.add (Val.add v1 (Vint n1)) y)
       with (Val.add (Val.add v1 y) (Vint n1)).
    apply eval_addimm. EvalOp.
    repeat rewrite Val.add_assoc. decEq. apply Val.add_commut.
  - subst.
    replace (Val.add x (Val.add v1 (Vint n2)))
       with (Val.add (Val.add x v1) (Vint n2)).
    apply eval_addimm. EvalOp.
    repeat rewrite Val.add_assoc. reflexivity.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_sub: binary_constructor_sound sub Val.sub.
Proof.
  red; intros until y.
  unfold sub; case (sub_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  - rewrite Val.sub_add_opp. apply eval_addimm; auto.
  - subst. rewrite Val.sub_add_l. rewrite Val.sub_add_r.
    rewrite Val.add_assoc. simpl. rewrite Int.add_commut. rewrite <- Int.sub_add_opp.
    apply eval_addimm; EvalOp.
  - subst. rewrite Val.sub_add_l. apply eval_addimm; EvalOp.
  - subst. rewrite Val.sub_add_r. apply eval_addimm; EvalOp.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_negint: unary_constructor_sound negint (fun v => Val.sub Vzero v).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold negint. case (negint_match a); intros; InvEval.
  TrivialExists.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_shlimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (fun a => shlimm a n)
                                    (fun x => Val.shl x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  red; intros until x.  unfold shlimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros; subst. exists x; split; auto. destruct x; simpl; auto. rewrite Int.shl_zero; auto.

  destruct (Int.ltu n Int.iwordsize) eqn:LT; simpl.
  destruct (shlimm_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - exists (Vint (Int.shl n1 n)); split. EvalOp.
    simpl. rewrite LT. auto.
  - destruct (Int.ltu (Int.add n n1) Int.iwordsize) eqn:?.
    + exists (Val.shl v1 (Vint (Int.add n n1))); split. EvalOp.
      subst. destruct v1; simpl; auto.
      rewrite Heqb.
      destruct (Int.ltu n1 Int.iwordsize) eqn:?; simpl; auto.
      destruct (Int.ltu n Int.iwordsize) eqn:?; simpl; auto.
      rewrite Int.add_commut. rewrite Int.shl_shl; auto. rewrite Int.add_commut; auto.
    + subst. TrivialExists. econstructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor.
      simpl. auto.
  - TrivialExists.
  - intros; TrivialExists. constructor. eauto. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor.
    auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_shruimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (fun a => shruimm a n)
                                    (fun x => Val.shru x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold shruimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros; subst. exists x; split; auto. destruct x; simpl; auto. rewrite Int.shru_zero; auto.

  destruct (Int.ltu n Int.iwordsize) eqn:LT; simpl.
  destruct (shruimm_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - exists (Vint (Int.shru n1 n)); split. EvalOp.
    simpl. rewrite LT; auto.
  - destruct (Int.ltu (Int.add n n1) Int.iwordsize) eqn:?.
    exists (Val.shru v1 (Vint (Int.add n n1))); split. EvalOp.
    subst. destruct v1; simpl; auto.
    rewrite Heqb.
    destruct (Int.ltu n1 Int.iwordsize) eqn:?; simpl; auto.
    rewrite LT. rewrite Int.add_commut. rewrite Int.shru_shru; auto. rewrite Int.add_commut; auto.
    subst. TrivialExists. econstructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor.
    simpl. auto.
  - TrivialExists.
  - intros; TrivialExists. constructor. eauto. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor.
    auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_shrimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (fun a => shrimm a n)
                                    (fun x => Val.shr x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold shrimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros; subst. exists x; split; auto. destruct x; simpl; auto. rewrite Int.shr_zero; auto.

  destruct (Int.ltu n Int.iwordsize) eqn:LT; simpl.
  destruct (shrimm_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - exists (Vint (Int.shr n1 n)); split. EvalOp.
    simpl. rewrite LT; auto.
  - destruct (Int.ltu (Int.add n n1) Int.iwordsize) eqn:?.
    exists (Val.shr v1 (Vint (Int.add n n1))); split. EvalOp.
    subst. destruct v1; simpl; auto.
    rewrite Heqb.
    destruct (Int.ltu n1 Int.iwordsize) eqn:?; simpl; auto.
    rewrite LT.
    rewrite Int.add_commut. rewrite Int.shr_shr; auto. rewrite Int.add_commut; auto.
    subst. TrivialExists. econstructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor.
    simpl. auto.
  - TrivialExists.
  - intros; TrivialExists. constructor. eauto. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor.
    auto.
Qed.

Lemma eval_mulimm_base:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (mulimm_base n) (fun x => Val.mul x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros; unfold mulimm_base.

  assert (DFL: exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (Eop Omul (Eop (Ointconst n) Enil ::: a ::: Enil)) v /\ Val.lessdef (Val.mul x (Vint n)) v).
  TrivialExists. econstructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. econstructor. eauto. constructor.
  rewrite Val.mul_commut. auto.

  generalize (Int.one_bits_decomp n).
  generalize (Int.one_bits_range n).
  destruct (Int.one_bits n).
  - intros. auto.
  - destruct l.
    + intros. rewrite H1. simpl.
      rewrite Int.add_zero.
      replace (Vint (Int.shl Int.one i)) with (Val.shl Vone (Vint i)). rewrite Val.shl_mul.
      apply eval_shlimm. auto. simpl. rewrite H0; auto with coqlib.
    + destruct l.
      intros. rewrite H1. simpl.
      exploit (eval_shlimm i (x :: le) (Eletvar 0) x). constructor; auto. intros [v1 [A1 B1]].
      exploit (eval_shlimm i0 (x :: le) (Eletvar 0) x). constructor; auto. intros [v2 [A2 B2]].
      exploit (eval_add (x :: le)). eexact A1. eexact A2. intros [v [A B]].
      exists v; split. econstructor; eauto.
      rewrite Int.add_zero.
      replace (Vint (Int.add (Int.shl Int.one i) (Int.shl Int.one i0)))
         with (Val.add (Val.shl Vone (Vint i)) (Val.shl Vone (Vint i0))).
      rewrite Val.mul_add_distr_r.
      repeat rewrite Val.shl_mul. eapply Val.lessdef_trans. 2: eauto. apply Val.add_lessdef; auto.
      simpl. repeat rewrite H0; auto with coqlib.
      intros. auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mulimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (mulimm n) (fun x => Val.mul x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros until x; unfold mulimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros. exists (Vint Int.zero); split. EvalOp.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. subst n. rewrite Int.mul_zero. auto.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.one.
  intros. exists x; split; auto.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. subst n. rewrite Int.mul_one. auto.

  case (mulimm_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - TrivialExists. simpl. rewrite Int.mul_commut; auto.
  - subst. rewrite Val.mul_add_distr_l.
    exploit eval_mulimm_base; eauto. instantiate (1 := n). intros [v' [A1 B1]].
    exploit (eval_addimm (Int.mul n n2) le (mulimm_base n t2) v'). auto. intros [v'' [A2 B2]].
    exists v''; split; auto. eapply Val.lessdef_trans. eapply Val.add_lessdef; eauto.
    rewrite Val.mul_commut; auto.
  - apply eval_mulimm_base; auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mul: binary_constructor_sound mul Val.mul.
Proof.
  red; intros until y.
  unfold mul; case (mul_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  rewrite Val.mul_commut. apply eval_mulimm. auto.
  apply eval_mulimm. auto.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mulhs: binary_constructor_sound mulhs Val.mulhs.
Proof.
  red; intros. unfold mulhs; destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF.
- econstructor; split.
  EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. 
  constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor. 
  simpl; eauto. constructor. simpl; eauto. constructor. simpl; eauto.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. destruct y; simpl; auto.
  change (Int.ltu (Int.repr 32) Int64.iwordsize') with true; simpl.
  apply Val.lessdef_same. f_equal. 
  transitivity (Int.repr (Z.shiftr (Int.signed i * Int.signed i0) 32)).
  unfold Int.mulhs; f_equal. rewrite Zshiftr_div_two_p by lia. reflexivity.
  apply Int.same_bits_eq; intros n N.
  change Int.zwordsize with 32 in *.
  assert (N1: 0 <= n < 64) by lia.
  rewrite Int64.bits_loword by auto.
  rewrite Int64.bits_shr' by auto.
  change (Int.unsigned (Int.repr 32)) with 32. change Int64.zwordsize with 64.
  rewrite zlt_true by lia.
  rewrite Int.testbit_repr by auto. 
  unfold Int64.mul. rewrite Int64.testbit_repr by (change Int64.zwordsize with 64; lia).
  transitivity (Z.testbit (Int.signed i * Int.signed i0) (n + 32)).
  rewrite Z.shiftr_spec by lia. auto.
  apply Int64.same_bits_eqm. apply Int64.eqm_mult; apply Int64.eqm_unsigned_repr. 
  change Int64.zwordsize with 64; lia.
- TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mulhu: binary_constructor_sound mulhu Val.mulhu.
Proof.
  red; intros. unfold mulhu; destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF.
- econstructor; split.
  EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. 
  constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor. 
  simpl; eauto. constructor. simpl; eauto. constructor. simpl; eauto.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. destruct y; simpl; auto.
  change (Int.ltu (Int.repr 32) Int64.iwordsize') with true; simpl.
  apply Val.lessdef_same. f_equal. 
  transitivity (Int.repr (Z.shiftr (Int.unsigned i * Int.unsigned i0) 32)).
  unfold Int.mulhu; f_equal. rewrite Zshiftr_div_two_p by lia. reflexivity.
  apply Int.same_bits_eq; intros n N.
  change Int.zwordsize with 32 in *.
  assert (N1: 0 <= n < 64) by lia.
  rewrite Int64.bits_loword by auto.
  rewrite Int64.bits_shru' by auto.
  change (Int.unsigned (Int.repr 32)) with 32. change Int64.zwordsize with 64.
  rewrite zlt_true by lia.
  rewrite Int.testbit_repr by auto. 
  unfold Int64.mul. rewrite Int64.testbit_repr by (change Int64.zwordsize with 64; lia).
  transitivity (Z.testbit (Int.unsigned i * Int.unsigned i0) (n + 32)).
  rewrite Z.shiftr_spec by lia. auto.
  apply Int64.same_bits_eqm. apply Int64.eqm_mult; apply Int64.eqm_unsigned_repr. 
  change Int64.zwordsize with 64; lia.
- TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_andimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (andimm n) (fun x => Val.and x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros until x. unfold andimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros. exists (Vint Int.zero); split. EvalOp.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. subst n. rewrite Int.and_zero. auto.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.mone.
  intros. exists x; split; auto.
  subst. destruct x; simpl; auto. rewrite Int.and_mone; auto.

  case (andimm_match a); intros.
  - InvEval. TrivialExists. simpl. rewrite Int.and_commut; auto.
  - InvEval. subst. rewrite Val.and_assoc. simpl. rewrite Int.and_commut. TrivialExists.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_and: binary_constructor_sound and Val.and.
Proof.
  red; intros until y; unfold and; case (and_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  - rewrite Val.and_commut. apply eval_andimm; auto.
  - apply eval_andimm; auto.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_orimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (orimm n) (fun x => Val.or x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros until x. unfold orimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros. subst. exists x; split; auto.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. rewrite Int.or_zero; auto.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.mone.
  intros. exists (Vint Int.mone); split. EvalOp.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. subst n. rewrite Int.or_mone. auto.

  destruct (orimm_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - TrivialExists. simpl. rewrite Int.or_commut; auto.
  - subst. rewrite Val.or_assoc. simpl. rewrite Int.or_commut. TrivialExists.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_or: binary_constructor_sound or Val.or.
Proof.
  red; intros until y; unfold or; case (or_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  - rewrite Val.or_commut. apply eval_orimm; auto.
  - apply eval_orimm; auto.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_xorimm:
  forall n, unary_constructor_sound (xorimm n) (fun x => Val.xor x (Vint n)).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros until x. unfold xorimm.

  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  intros. exists x; split. auto.
  destruct x; simpl; auto. subst n. rewrite Int.xor_zero. auto.

  intros. destruct (xorimm_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - TrivialExists. simpl. rewrite Int.xor_commut; auto.
  - subst. rewrite Val.xor_assoc. simpl. rewrite Int.xor_commut. 
    predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec (Int.xor n2 n) Int.zero.
    + exists v1; split; auto. destruct v1; simpl; auto. rewrite H0, Int.xor_zero; auto.  
    + TrivialExists.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_xor: binary_constructor_sound xor Val.xor.
Proof.
  red; intros until y; unfold xor; case (xor_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  - rewrite Val.xor_commut. apply eval_xorimm; auto.
  - apply eval_xorimm; auto.
  - TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_notint: unary_constructor_sound notint Val.notint.
Proof.
  unfold notint; red; intros. rewrite Val.not_xor. apply eval_xorimm; auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_divs_base:
  forall le a b x y z,
    eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
    eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
    Val.divs x y = Some z ->
    exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (divs_base a b) v /\ Val.lessdef z v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold divs_base. exists z; split. EvalOp. auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mods_base:
  forall le a b x y z,
    eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
    eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
    Val.mods x y = Some z ->
    exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (mods_base a b) v /\ Val.lessdef z v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold mods_base. exists z; split. EvalOp. auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_divu_base:
  forall le a b x y z,
    eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
    eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
    Val.divu x y = Some z ->
    exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (divu_base a b) v /\ Val.lessdef z v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold divu_base. exists z; split. EvalOp. auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_modu_base:
  forall le a b x y z,
    eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
    eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
    Val.modu x y = Some z ->
    exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (modu_base a b) v /\ Val.lessdef z v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold modu_base. exists z; split. EvalOp. auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_shrximm:
  forall le a n x z,
    eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
    Val.shrx x (Vint n) = Some z ->
    exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (shrximm a n) v /\ Val.lessdef z v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold shrximm.
  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  subst n. exists x; split; auto.
  destruct x; simpl in H0; try discriminate.
  destruct (Int.ltu Int.zero (Int.repr 31)); inv H0.
  replace (Int.shrx i Int.zero) with i. auto.
  unfold Int.shrx, Int.divs. rewrite Int.shl_zero.
  change (Int.signed Int.one) with 1. rewrite Z.quot_1_r. rewrite Int.repr_signed; auto.
  econstructor; split. EvalOp. auto.
(*
  intros. destruct x; simpl in H0; try discriminate. 
  destruct (Int.ltu n (Int.repr 31)) eqn:LTU; inv H0.
  unfold shrximm.
  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec n Int.zero.
  - subst n. exists (Vint i); split; auto.
    unfold Int.shrx, Int.divs. rewrite Z.quot_1_r. rewrite Int.repr_signed. auto.
  - assert (NZ: Int.unsigned n <> 0).
    { intro EQ; elim H0. rewrite <- (Int.repr_unsigned n). rewrite EQ; auto. }
    assert (LT: 0 <= Int.unsigned n < 31) by (apply Int.ltu_inv in LTU; assumption).
    assert (LTU2: Int.ltu (Int.sub Int.iwordsize n) Int.iwordsize = true).
    { unfold Int.ltu; apply zlt_true.
      unfold Int.sub. change (Int.unsigned Int.iwordsize) with 32. 
      rewrite Int.unsigned_repr. lia. 
      assert (32 < Int.max_unsigned) by reflexivity. lia. }
    assert (X: eval_expr ge sp e m le
               (Eop (Oshrimm (Int.repr (Int.zwordsize - 1))) (a ::: Enil))
               (Vint (Int.shr i (Int.repr (Int.zwordsize - 1))))).
    { EvalOp. }
    assert (Y: eval_expr ge sp e m le (shrximm_inner a n)
               (Vint (Int.shru (Int.shr i (Int.repr (Int.zwordsize - 1))) (Int.sub Int.iwordsize n)))).
    { EvalOp. simpl. rewrite LTU2. auto. }
    TrivialExists. 
    constructor. EvalOp. simpl; eauto. constructor. 
    simpl. unfold Int.ltu; rewrite zlt_true. rewrite Int.shrx_shr_2 by auto. reflexivity. 
    change (Int.unsigned Int.iwordsize) with 32; lia.
*)
Qed.

Theorem eval_shl: binary_constructor_sound shl Val.shl.
Proof.
  red; intros until y; unfold shl; case (shl_match b); intros.
  InvEval. apply eval_shlimm; auto.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_shr: binary_constructor_sound shr Val.shr.
Proof.
  red; intros until y; unfold shr; case (shr_match b); intros.
  InvEval. apply eval_shrimm; auto.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_shru: binary_constructor_sound shru Val.shru.
Proof.
  red; intros until y; unfold shru; case (shru_match b); intros.
  InvEval. apply eval_shruimm; auto.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_negf: unary_constructor_sound negf Val.negf.
Proof.
  red; intros. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_absf: unary_constructor_sound absf Val.absf.
Proof.
  red; intros. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_addf: binary_constructor_sound addf Val.addf.
Proof.
  red; intros; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_subf: binary_constructor_sound subf Val.subf.
Proof.
  red; intros; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mulf: binary_constructor_sound mulf Val.mulf.
Proof.
  red; intros; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_negfs: unary_constructor_sound negfs Val.negfs.
Proof.
  red; intros. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_absfs: unary_constructor_sound absfs Val.absfs.
Proof.
  red; intros. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_addfs: binary_constructor_sound addfs Val.addfs.
Proof.
  red; intros; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_subfs: binary_constructor_sound subfs Val.subfs.
Proof.
  red; intros; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_mulfs: binary_constructor_sound mulfs Val.mulfs.
Proof.
  red; intros; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Section COMP_IMM.

Variable default: comparison -> int -> condition.
Variable intsem: comparison -> int -> int -> bool.
Variable sem: comparison -> val -> val -> val.

Hypothesis sem_int: forall c x y, sem c (Vint x) (Vint y) = Val.of_bool (intsem c x y).
Hypothesis sem_undef: forall c v, sem c Vundef v = Vundef.
Hypothesis sem_eq: forall x y, sem Ceq (Vint x) (Vint y) = Val.of_bool (Int.eq x y).
Hypothesis sem_ne: forall x y, sem Cne (Vint x) (Vint y) = Val.of_bool (negb (Int.eq x y)).
Hypothesis sem_default: forall c v n, sem c v (Vint n) = Val.of_optbool (eval_condition (default c n) (v :: nil) m).

Lemma eval_compimm:
  forall le c a n2 x,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (compimm default intsem c a n2) v
         /\ Val.lessdef (sem c x (Vint n2)) v.
Proof.
  intros until x.
  unfold compimm; case (compimm_match c a); intros.
(* constant *)
  - InvEval. rewrite sem_int. TrivialExists. simpl. destruct (intsem c0 n1 n2); auto.
(* eq cmp *)
  - InvEval. inv H. simpl in H5. inv H5.
    destruct (Int.eq_dec n2 Int.zero).
    + subst n2. TrivialExists.
      simpl. rewrite eval_negate_condition.
      destruct (eval_condition c0 vl m); simpl.
      unfold Vtrue, Vfalse. destruct b; simpl; rewrite sem_eq; auto.
      rewrite sem_undef; auto.
    + destruct (Int.eq_dec n2 Int.one). subst n2. TrivialExists.
      simpl. destruct (eval_condition c0 vl m); simpl.
      unfold Vtrue, Vfalse. destruct b; simpl; rewrite sem_eq; auto.
      rewrite sem_undef; auto.
      exists (Vint Int.zero); split. EvalOp.
      destruct (eval_condition c0 vl m); simpl.
      unfold Vtrue, Vfalse. destruct b; rewrite sem_eq; rewrite Int.eq_false; auto.
      rewrite sem_undef; auto.
(* ne cmp *)
  - InvEval. inv H. simpl in H5. inv H5.
    destruct (Int.eq_dec n2 Int.zero).
    + subst n2. TrivialExists.
      simpl. destruct (eval_condition c0 vl m); simpl.
      unfold Vtrue, Vfalse. destruct b; simpl; rewrite sem_ne; auto.
      rewrite sem_undef; auto.
    + destruct (Int.eq_dec n2 Int.one). subst n2. TrivialExists.
      simpl. rewrite eval_negate_condition. destruct (eval_condition c0 vl m); simpl.
      unfold Vtrue, Vfalse. destruct b; simpl; rewrite sem_ne; auto.
      rewrite sem_undef; auto.
      exists (Vint Int.one); split. EvalOp.
      destruct (eval_condition c0 vl m); simpl.
      unfold Vtrue, Vfalse. destruct b; rewrite sem_ne; rewrite Int.eq_false; auto.
      rewrite sem_undef; auto.
(* default *)
  - TrivialExists. simpl. rewrite sem_default. auto.
Qed.

Hypothesis sem_swap:
  forall c x y, sem (swap_comparison c) x y = sem c y x.

Lemma eval_compimm_swap:
  forall le c a n2 x,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (compimm default intsem (swap_comparison c) a n2) v
         /\ Val.lessdef (sem c (Vint n2) x) v.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite <- sem_swap. eapply eval_compimm; eauto.
Qed.

End COMP_IMM.

Theorem eval_comp:
  forall c, binary_constructor_sound (comp c) (Val.cmp c).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros until y. unfold comp; case (comp_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  eapply eval_compimm_swap; eauto.
  intros. unfold Val.cmp. rewrite Val.swap_cmp_bool; auto.
  eapply eval_compimm; eauto.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_compu:
  forall c, binary_constructor_sound (compu c) (Val.cmpu (Mem.valid_pointer m) c).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros until y. unfold compu; case (compu_match a b); intros; InvEval.
  eapply eval_compimm_swap; eauto.
  intros. unfold Val.cmpu. rewrite Val.swap_cmpu_bool; auto.
  eapply eval_compimm; eauto.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_compf:
  forall c, binary_constructor_sound (compf c) (Val.cmpf c).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. unfold compf. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_compfs:
  forall c, binary_constructor_sound (compfs c) (Val.cmpfs c).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. unfold compfs. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_cast8signed: unary_constructor_sound cast8signed (Val.sign_ext 8).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold cast8signed. case (cast8signed_match a); intros; InvEval.
  TrivialExists.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_cast8unsigned: unary_constructor_sound cast8unsigned (Val.zero_ext 8).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold cast8unsigned.
  rewrite Val.zero_ext_and. apply eval_andimm. lia.
Qed.

Theorem eval_cast16signed: unary_constructor_sound cast16signed (Val.sign_ext 16).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold cast16signed. case (cast16signed_match a); intros; InvEval.
  TrivialExists.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_cast16unsigned: unary_constructor_sound cast16unsigned (Val.zero_ext 16).
Proof.
  red; intros until x. unfold cast8unsigned.
  rewrite Val.zero_ext_and. apply eval_andimm. lia.
Qed.

Theorem eval_intoffloat:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.intoffloat x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (intoffloat a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros; unfold intoffloat. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_intuoffloat:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.intuoffloat x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (intuoffloat a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros; unfold intuoffloat. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_floatofintu:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.floatofintu x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (floatofintu a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros until y; unfold floatofintu. case (floatofintu_match a); intros.
  InvEval. simpl in H0. TrivialExists.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_floatofint:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.floatofint x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (floatofint a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros until y; unfold floatofint. case (floatofint_match a); intros.
  InvEval. simpl in H0. TrivialExists.
  TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_intofsingle:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.intofsingle x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (intofsingle a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros; unfold intofsingle. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_singleofint:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.singleofint x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (singleofint a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros; unfold singleofint; TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_intuofsingle:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.intuofsingle x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (intuofsingle a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros; unfold intuofsingle. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_singleofintu:
  forall le a x y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  Val.singleofintu x = Some y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (singleofintu a) v /\ Val.lessdef y v.
Proof.
  intros; unfold intuofsingle. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_singleoffloat: unary_constructor_sound singleoffloat Val.singleoffloat.
Proof.
  red; intros. unfold singleoffloat. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_floatofsingle: unary_constructor_sound floatofsingle Val.floatofsingle.
Proof.
  red; intros. unfold floatofsingle. TrivialExists.
Qed.

Theorem eval_select:
  forall le ty cond al vl a1 v1 a2 v2 a b,
  select ty cond al a1 a2 = Some a ->
  eval_exprlist ge sp e m le al vl ->
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a1 v1 ->
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a2 v2 ->
  eval_condition cond vl m = Some b ->
  exists v, 
     eval_expr ge sp e m le a v
  /\ Val.lessdef (Val.select (Some b) v1 v2 ty) v.
Proof.
  unfold select; intros; discriminate.
Qed.

Theorem eval_addressing:
  forall le chunk a v b ofs,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a v ->
  v = Vptr b ofs ->
  match addressing chunk a with (mode, args) =>
    exists vl,
    eval_exprlist ge sp e m le args vl /\
    eval_addressing ge sp mode vl = Some v
  end.
Proof.
  intros until v. unfold addressing; case (addressing_match a); intros; InvEval.
  - exists (@nil val);  split. eauto with evalexpr. simpl. auto.
  - destruct (Archi.pic_code tt).
  + exists (Vptr b ofs0 :: nil); split.
    constructor. EvalOp. simpl. congruence. constructor. simpl. rewrite Ptrofs.add_zero. congruence.
  + exists (@nil val); split. constructor. simpl; auto.
  - exists (v1 :: nil); split. eauto with evalexpr. simpl.
    destruct v1; simpl in H; try discriminate. destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF; inv H. 
    simpl. auto.
  - exists (v1 :: nil); split. eauto with evalexpr. simpl.
    destruct v1; simpl in H; try discriminate. destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF; inv H. 
    simpl. auto.
  - exists (v :: nil);  split. eauto with evalexpr. subst. simpl. rewrite Ptrofs.add_zero; auto.
Qed.

Theorem eval_builtin_arg:
  forall a v,
  eval_expr ge sp e m nil a v ->
  CminorSel.eval_builtin_arg ge sp e m (builtin_arg a) v.
Proof.
  intros until v. unfold builtin_arg; case (builtin_arg_match a); intros.
- InvEval. constructor.
- InvEval. constructor.
- InvEval. constructor.
- InvEval. simpl in H5. inv H5. constructor.
- InvEval. subst v. constructor; auto.
- inv H. InvEval. simpl in H6; inv H6. constructor; auto.
- destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF.
+ constructor; auto.
+ InvEval. replace v with (if Archi.ptr64 then Val.addl v1 (Vint n) else Val.add v1 (Vint n)).
  repeat constructor; auto.
  rewrite SF; auto.
- destruct Archi.ptr64 eqn:SF.
+ InvEval. replace v with (if Archi.ptr64 then Val.addl v1 (Vlong n) else Val.add v1 (Vlong n)).
  repeat constructor; auto.
  rewrite SF; auto.
+ constructor; auto.
- constructor; auto.
Qed.

(** Platform-specific known builtins *)

Theorem eval_platform_builtin:
  forall bf al a vl v le,
  platform_builtin bf al = Some a ->
  eval_exprlist ge sp e m le al vl ->
  platform_builtin_sem bf vl = Some v ->
  exists v', eval_expr ge sp e m le a v' /\ Val.lessdef v v'.
Proof.
  intros. discriminate.
Qed.

End CMCONSTR.