summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--method-new.tex2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/method-new.tex b/method-new.tex
index 5b204b8..95af4f7 100644
--- a/method-new.tex
+++ b/method-new.tex
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ Having generated HLS-friendly programs and automatically augmented them with dir
%Figure~\ref{fig:method:toolflow} shows the three stages of testing, depicted as the testing environment in the dashed area.
For each HLS tool in turn, we compile the C program to RTL and then simulate the RTL.
Independently, we also compile the C program using GCC and execute it.
-Additionally, to ensure that our testing is scalable for a large number of large, random programs, we also enforce several time-outs: we set a 5-minute time-
+Additionally, to ensure that our testing is scalable for a large number of large, random programs, we also enforce several time-outs: we set a 5-minute time-out for C simulation
\paragraph{Types of bugs}
There two types of bugs that we can encounter in this testing setup: programs that cause the HLS tool to crash during compilation (e.g. an unhandled assertion violation or a segmentation fault), and programs where the software execution and the RTL simulation do not return the same value.