aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/common/IntegerExtra.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/common/IntegerExtra.v')
-rw-r--r--src/common/IntegerExtra.v134
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/src/common/IntegerExtra.v b/src/common/IntegerExtra.v
index 6bac18d..8e32c2c 100644
--- a/src/common/IntegerExtra.v
+++ b/src/common/IntegerExtra.v
@@ -70,22 +70,21 @@ Module PtrofsExtra.
Lemma of_int_mod :
forall x m,
- Int.signed x mod m = 0 ->
- Ptrofs.signed (Ptrofs.of_int x) mod m = 0.
+ Int.unsigned x mod m = 0 ->
+ Ptrofs.unsigned (Ptrofs.of_int x) mod m = 0.
Proof.
intros.
- pose proof (Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_of_int eq_refl x) as A.
- pose proof Ptrofs.agree32_signed.
- apply H0 in A; try reflexivity.
- rewrite A. assumption.
+ unfold Ptrofs.of_int.
+ rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush;
+ apply Int.unsigned_range_2.
Qed.
Lemma mul_mod :
forall x y m,
0 < m ->
(m | Ptrofs.modulus) ->
- Ptrofs.signed x mod m = 0 ->
- Ptrofs.signed y mod m = 0 ->
+ Ptrofs.unsigned x mod m = 0 ->
+ Ptrofs.unsigned y mod m = 0 ->
(Ptrofs.signed (Ptrofs.mul x y)) mod m = 0.
Proof.
intros. unfold Ptrofs.mul.
@@ -95,7 +94,6 @@ Module PtrofsExtra.
| [ _ : _ |- context[if ?x then _ else _] ] => destruct x
| [ _ : _ |- context[_ mod Ptrofs.modulus mod m] ] =>
rewrite <- Zmod_div_mod; try lia; try assumption
- | [ _ : _ |- context[Ptrofs.unsigned _] ] => rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_signed
end; try(crush; lia); ptrofs_mod_tac m.
Qed.
@@ -103,8 +101,8 @@ Module PtrofsExtra.
forall x y m,
0 < m ->
(m | Ptrofs.modulus) ->
- Ptrofs.signed x mod m = 0 ->
- Ptrofs.signed y mod m = 0 ->
+ Ptrofs.unsigned x mod m = 0 ->
+ Ptrofs.unsigned y mod m = 0 ->
(Ptrofs.unsigned (Ptrofs.add x y)) mod m = 0.
Proof.
intros. unfold Ptrofs.add.
@@ -114,7 +112,6 @@ Module PtrofsExtra.
| [ _ : _ |- context[if ?x then _ else _] ] => destruct x
| [ _ : _ |- context[_ mod Ptrofs.modulus mod m] ] =>
rewrite <- Zmod_div_mod; try lia; try assumption
- | [ _ : _ |- context[Ptrofs.unsigned _] ] => rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_signed
end; try (crush; lia); ptrofs_mod_tac m.
Qed.
@@ -202,7 +199,7 @@ Ltac ptrofs :=
end.
Module IntExtra.
-
+ Import Int.
Ltac int_mod_match m :=
match goal with
| [ H : ?x = 0 |- context[?x] ] => rewrite H
@@ -243,22 +240,37 @@ Module IntExtra.
Ltac int_mod_tac m :=
repeat (int_mod_match m); lia.
- Lemma mul_mod :
+ Lemma mul_mod1 :
+ forall x y m,
+ 0 < m ->
+ (m | Int.modulus) ->
+ Int.unsigned x mod m = 0 ->
+ (Int.unsigned (Int.mul x y)) mod m = 0.
+ Proof.
+ intros. unfold Int.mul.
+ rewrite Int.unsigned_repr_eq.
+
+ repeat match goal with
+ | [ _ : _ |- context[if ?x then _ else _] ] => destruct x
+ | [ _ : _ |- context[_ mod Int.modulus mod m] ] =>
+ rewrite <- Zmod_div_mod; try lia; try assumption
+ end; try (crush; lia); int_mod_tac m.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma mul_mod2 :
forall x y m,
0 < m ->
(m | Int.modulus) ->
- Int.signed x mod m = 0 ->
- Int.signed y mod m = 0 ->
- (Int.signed (Int.mul x y)) mod m = 0.
+ Int.unsigned y mod m = 0 ->
+ (Int.unsigned (Int.mul x y)) mod m = 0.
Proof.
intros. unfold Int.mul.
- rewrite Int.signed_repr_eq.
+ rewrite Int.unsigned_repr_eq.
repeat match goal with
| [ _ : _ |- context[if ?x then _ else _] ] => destruct x
| [ _ : _ |- context[_ mod Int.modulus mod m] ] =>
rewrite <- Zmod_div_mod; try lia; try assumption
- | [ _ : _ |- context[Int.unsigned _] ] => rewrite Int.unsigned_signed
end; try (crush; lia); int_mod_tac m.
Qed.
@@ -266,18 +278,92 @@ Module IntExtra.
forall x y m,
0 < m ->
(m | Int.modulus) ->
- Int.signed x mod m = 0 ->
- Int.signed y mod m = 0 ->
- (Int.signed (Int.add x y)) mod m = 0.
+ Int.unsigned x mod m = 0 ->
+ Int.unsigned y mod m = 0 ->
+ (Int.unsigned (Int.add x y)) mod m = 0.
Proof.
intros. unfold Int.add.
- rewrite Int.signed_repr_eq.
+ rewrite Int.unsigned_repr_eq.
repeat match goal with
| [ _ : _ |- context[if ?x then _ else _] ] => destruct x
| [ _ : _ |- context[_ mod Int.modulus mod m] ] =>
rewrite <- Zmod_div_mod; try lia; try assumption
- | [ _ : _ |- context[Int.unsigned _] ] => rewrite Int.unsigned_signed
end; try (crush; lia); int_mod_tac m.
Qed.
+
+ Definition ofbytes (a b c d : byte) : int :=
+ or (shl (repr (Byte.unsigned a)) (repr (3 * Byte.zwordsize)))
+ (or (shl (repr (Byte.unsigned b)) (repr (2 * Byte.zwordsize)))
+ (or (shl (repr (Byte.unsigned c)) (repr Byte.zwordsize))
+ (repr (Byte.unsigned d)))).
+
+ Definition byte0 (n: int) : byte := Byte.repr $ unsigned n.
+ Definition ibyte0 (n: int) : int := Int.repr $ Byte.unsigned $ byte0 n.
+
+ Definition byte1 (n: int) : byte := Byte.repr $ unsigned $ shru n $ repr Byte.zwordsize.
+ Definition ibyte1 (n: int) : int := Int.repr $ Byte.unsigned $ byte1 n.
+
+ Definition byte2 (n: int) : byte := Byte.repr $ unsigned $ shru n $ repr (2 * Byte.zwordsize).
+ Definition ibyte2 (n: int) : int := Int.repr $ Byte.unsigned $ byte2 n.
+
+ Definition byte3 (n: int) : byte := Byte.repr $ unsigned $ shru n $ repr (3 * Byte.zwordsize).
+ Definition ibyte3 (n: int) : int := Int.repr $ Byte.unsigned $ byte3 n.
+
+ Lemma bits_byte0:
+ forall n i, 0 <= i < Byte.zwordsize -> Byte.testbit (byte0 n) i = testbit n i.
+ Proof.
+ intros. unfold byte0. rewrite Byte.testbit_repr; auto.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma bits_byte1:
+ forall n i, 0 <= i < Byte.zwordsize -> Byte.testbit (byte1 n) i = testbit n (i + Byte.zwordsize).
+ Proof.
+ intros. unfold byte1. rewrite Byte.testbit_repr; auto.
+ assert (zwordsize = 4 * Byte.zwordsize) by reflexivity.
+ fold (testbit (shru n (repr Byte.zwordsize)) i). rewrite bits_shru.
+ change (unsigned (repr Byte.zwordsize)) with Byte.zwordsize.
+ apply zlt_true. omega. omega.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma bits_byte2:
+ forall n i, 0 <= i < Byte.zwordsize -> Byte.testbit (byte2 n) i = testbit n (i + (2 * Byte.zwordsize)).
+ Proof.
+ intros. unfold byte2. rewrite Byte.testbit_repr; auto.
+ assert (zwordsize = 4 * Byte.zwordsize) by reflexivity.
+ fold (testbit (shru n (repr (2 * Byte.zwordsize))) i). rewrite bits_shru.
+ change (unsigned (repr (2 * Byte.zwordsize))) with (2 * Byte.zwordsize).
+ apply zlt_true. omega. omega.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma bits_byte3:
+ forall n i, 0 <= i < Byte.zwordsize -> Byte.testbit (byte3 n) i = testbit n (i + (3 * Byte.zwordsize)).
+ Proof.
+ intros. unfold byte3. rewrite Byte.testbit_repr; auto.
+ assert (zwordsize = 4 * Byte.zwordsize) by reflexivity.
+ fold (testbit (shru n (repr (3 * Byte.zwordsize))) i). rewrite bits_shru.
+ change (unsigned (repr (3 * Byte.zwordsize))) with (3 * Byte.zwordsize).
+ apply zlt_true. omega. omega.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma bits_ofwords:
+ forall b4 b3 b2 b1 i, 0 <= i < zwordsize ->
+ testbit (ofbytes b4 b3 b2 b1) i =
+ if zlt i Byte.zwordsize
+ then Byte.testbit b1 i
+ else (if zlt i (2 * Byte.zwordsize)
+ then Byte.testbit b2 (i - Byte.zwordsize)
+ else (if zlt i (3 * Byte.zwordsize)
+ then Byte.testbit b2 (i - 2 * Byte.zwordsize)
+ else Byte.testbit b2 (i - 3 * Byte.zwordsize))).
+ Proof.
+ intros. unfold ofbytes. repeat (rewrite bits_or; auto). repeat (rewrite bits_shl; auto).
+ change (unsigned (repr Byte.zwordsize)) with Byte.zwordsize.
+ change (unsigned (repr (2 * Byte.zwordsize))) with (2 * Byte.zwordsize).
+ change (unsigned (repr (3 * Byte.zwordsize))) with (3 * Byte.zwordsize).
+ assert (zwordsize = 4 * Byte.zwordsize) by reflexivity.
+ destruct (zlt i Byte.zwordsize).
+ rewrite testbit_repr; auto.
+ Abort.
+
End IntExtra.