diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/translation/HTLgenproof.v')
-rw-r--r-- | src/translation/HTLgenproof.v | 2683 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2683 deletions
diff --git a/src/translation/HTLgenproof.v b/src/translation/HTLgenproof.v deleted file mode 100644 index bf63800..0000000 --- a/src/translation/HTLgenproof.v +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2683 +0,0 @@ -(* - * Vericert: Verified high-level synthesis. - * Copyright (C) 2020 Yann Herklotz <yann@yannherklotz.com> - * - * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or - * (at your option) any later version. - * - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - * GNU General Public License for more details. - * - * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - * along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. - *) - -From compcert Require RTL Registers AST. -From compcert Require Import Integers Globalenvs Memory Linking. -From vericert Require Import Vericertlib HTLgenspec HTLgen ValueInt AssocMap Array IntegerExtra ZExtra. -From vericert Require HTL Verilog. - -Require Import Lia. - -Local Open Scope assocmap. - -Hint Resolve Smallstep.forward_simulation_plus : htlproof. -Hint Resolve AssocMap.gss : htlproof. -Hint Resolve AssocMap.gso : htlproof. - -Hint Unfold find_assocmap AssocMapExt.get_default : htlproof. - -Inductive match_assocmaps : RTL.function -> RTL.regset -> assocmap -> Prop := - match_assocmap : forall f rs am, - (forall r, Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f) -> - val_value_lessdef (Registers.Regmap.get r rs) am#r) -> - match_assocmaps f rs am. -Hint Constructors match_assocmaps : htlproof. - -Definition state_st_wf (m : HTL.module) (s : HTL.state) := - forall st asa asr res, - s = HTL.State res m st asa asr -> - asa!(m.(HTL.mod_st)) = Some (posToValue st). -Hint Unfold state_st_wf : htlproof. - -Inductive match_arrs (m : HTL.module) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (mem : mem) : - Verilog.assocmap_arr -> Prop := -| match_arr : forall asa stack, - asa ! (m.(HTL.mod_stk)) = Some stack /\ - stack.(arr_length) = Z.to_nat (f.(RTL.fn_stacksize) / 4) /\ - (forall ptr, - 0 <= ptr < Z.of_nat m.(HTL.mod_stk_len) -> - opt_val_value_lessdef (Mem.loadv AST.Mint32 mem - (Values.Val.offset_ptr sp (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (4 * ptr)))) - (Option.default (NToValue 0) - (Option.join (array_get_error (Z.to_nat ptr) stack)))) -> - match_arrs m f sp mem asa. - -Definition stack_based (v : Values.val) (sp : Values.block) : Prop := - match v with - | Values.Vptr sp' off => sp' = sp - | _ => True - end. - -Definition reg_stack_based_pointers (sp : Values.block) (rs : Registers.Regmap.t Values.val) : Prop := - forall r, stack_based (Registers.Regmap.get r rs) sp. - -Definition arr_stack_based_pointers (spb : Values.block) (m : mem) (stack_length : Z) - (sp : Values.val) : Prop := - forall ptr, - 0 <= ptr < (stack_length / 4) -> - stack_based (Option.default - Values.Vundef - (Mem.loadv AST.Mint32 m - (Values.Val.offset_ptr sp (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (4 * ptr))))) - spb. - -Definition stack_bounds (sp : Values.val) (hi : Z) (m : mem) : Prop := - forall ptr v, - hi <= ptr <= Integers.Ptrofs.max_unsigned -> - Z.modulo ptr 4 = 0 -> - Mem.loadv AST.Mint32 m (Values.Val.offset_ptr sp (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr )) = None /\ - Mem.storev AST.Mint32 m (Values.Val.offset_ptr sp (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr )) v = None. - -Inductive match_frames : list RTL.stackframe -> list HTL.stackframe -> Prop := -| match_frames_nil : - match_frames nil nil. - -Inductive match_constants : HTL.module -> assocmap -> Prop := - match_constant : - forall m asr, - asr!(HTL.mod_reset m) = Some (ZToValue 0) -> - asr!(HTL.mod_finish m) = Some (ZToValue 0) -> - match_constants m asr. - -Inductive match_states : RTL.state -> HTL.state -> Prop := -| match_state : forall asa asr sf f sp sp' rs mem m st res - (MASSOC : match_assocmaps f rs asr) - (TF : tr_module f m) - (WF : state_st_wf m (HTL.State res m st asr asa)) - (MF : match_frames sf res) - (MARR : match_arrs m f sp mem asa) - (SP : sp = Values.Vptr sp' (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0)) - (RSBP : reg_stack_based_pointers sp' rs) - (ASBP : arr_stack_based_pointers sp' mem (f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) sp) - (BOUNDS : stack_bounds sp (f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) mem) - (CONST : match_constants m asr), - match_states (RTL.State sf f sp st rs mem) - (HTL.State res m st asr asa) -| match_returnstate : - forall - v v' stack mem res - (MF : match_frames stack res), - val_value_lessdef v v' -> - match_states (RTL.Returnstate stack v mem) (HTL.Returnstate res v') -| match_initial_call : - forall f m m0 - (TF : tr_module f m), - match_states (RTL.Callstate nil (AST.Internal f) nil m0) (HTL.Callstate nil m nil). -Hint Constructors match_states : htlproof. - -Definition match_prog (p: RTL.program) (tp: HTL.program) := - Linking.match_program (fun cu f tf => transl_fundef f = Errors.OK tf) eq p tp /\ - main_is_internal p = true. - -Instance TransfHTLLink (tr_fun: RTL.program -> Errors.res HTL.program): - TransfLink (fun (p1: RTL.program) (p2: HTL.program) => match_prog p1 p2). -Proof. - red. intros. exfalso. destruct (link_linkorder _ _ _ H) as [LO1 LO2]. - apply link_prog_inv in H. - - unfold match_prog in *. - unfold main_is_internal in *. simplify. repeat (unfold_match H4). - repeat (unfold_match H3). simplify. - subst. rewrite H0 in *. specialize (H (AST.prog_main p2)). - exploit H. - apply Genv.find_def_symbol. exists b. split. - assumption. apply Genv.find_funct_ptr_iff. eassumption. - apply Genv.find_def_symbol. exists b0. split. - assumption. apply Genv.find_funct_ptr_iff. eassumption. - intros. inv H3. inv H5. destruct H6. inv H5. -Qed. - -Definition match_prog' (p: RTL.program) (tp: HTL.program) := - Linking.match_program (fun cu f tf => transl_fundef f = Errors.OK tf) eq p tp. - -Lemma match_prog_matches : - forall p tp, match_prog p tp -> match_prog' p tp. -Proof. unfold match_prog. tauto. Qed. - -Lemma transf_program_match: - forall p tp, HTLgen.transl_program p = Errors.OK tp -> match_prog p tp. -Proof. - intros. unfold transl_program in H. - destruct (main_is_internal p) eqn:?; try discriminate. - unfold match_prog. split. - apply Linking.match_transform_partial_program; auto. - assumption. -Qed. - -Lemma regs_lessdef_add_greater : - forall f rs1 rs2 n v, - Plt (RTL.max_reg_function f) n -> - match_assocmaps f rs1 rs2 -> - match_assocmaps f rs1 (AssocMap.set n v rs2). -Proof. - inversion 2; subst. - intros. constructor. - intros. unfold find_assocmap. unfold AssocMapExt.get_default. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. eauto. - apply Pos.le_lt_trans with _ _ n in H2. - unfold not. intros. subst. eapply Pos.lt_irrefl. eassumption. assumption. -Qed. -Hint Resolve regs_lessdef_add_greater : htlproof. - -Lemma regs_lessdef_add_match : - forall f rs am r v v', - val_value_lessdef v v' -> - match_assocmaps f rs am -> - match_assocmaps f (Registers.Regmap.set r v rs) (AssocMap.set r v' am). -Proof. - inversion 2; subst. - constructor. intros. - destruct (peq r0 r); subst. - rewrite Registers.Regmap.gss. - unfold find_assocmap. unfold AssocMapExt.get_default. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. assumption. - - rewrite Registers.Regmap.gso; try assumption. - unfold find_assocmap. unfold AssocMapExt.get_default. - rewrite AssocMap.gso; eauto. -Qed. -Hint Resolve regs_lessdef_add_match : htlproof. - -Lemma list_combine_none : - forall n l, - length l = n -> - list_combine Verilog.merge_cell (list_repeat None n) l = l. -Proof. - induction n; intros; crush. - - symmetry. apply length_zero_iff_nil. auto. - - destruct l; crush. - rewrite list_repeat_cons. - crush. f_equal. - eauto. -Qed. - -Lemma combine_none : - forall n a, - a.(arr_length) = n -> - arr_contents (combine Verilog.merge_cell (arr_repeat None n) a) = arr_contents a. -Proof. - intros. - unfold combine. - crush. - - rewrite <- (arr_wf a) in H. - apply list_combine_none. - assumption. -Qed. - -Lemma list_combine_lookup_first : - forall l1 l2 n, - length l1 = length l2 -> - nth_error l1 n = Some None -> - nth_error (list_combine Verilog.merge_cell l1 l2) n = nth_error l2 n. -Proof. - induction l1; intros; crush. - - rewrite nth_error_nil in H0. - discriminate. - - destruct l2 eqn:EQl2. crush. - simpl in H. invert H. - destruct n; simpl in *. - invert H0. simpl. reflexivity. - eauto. -Qed. - -Lemma combine_lookup_first : - forall a1 a2 n, - a1.(arr_length) = a2.(arr_length) -> - array_get_error n a1 = Some None -> - array_get_error n (combine Verilog.merge_cell a1 a2) = array_get_error n a2. -Proof. - intros. - - unfold array_get_error in *. - apply list_combine_lookup_first; eauto. - rewrite a1.(arr_wf). rewrite a2.(arr_wf). - assumption. -Qed. - -Lemma list_combine_lookup_second : - forall l1 l2 n x, - length l1 = length l2 -> - nth_error l1 n = Some (Some x) -> - nth_error (list_combine Verilog.merge_cell l1 l2) n = Some (Some x). -Proof. - induction l1; intros; crush; auto. - - destruct l2 eqn:EQl2. crush. - simpl in H. invert H. - destruct n; simpl in *. - invert H0. simpl. reflexivity. - eauto. -Qed. - -Lemma combine_lookup_second : - forall a1 a2 n x, - a1.(arr_length) = a2.(arr_length) -> - array_get_error n a1 = Some (Some x) -> - array_get_error n (combine Verilog.merge_cell a1 a2) = Some (Some x). -Proof. - intros. - - unfold array_get_error in *. - apply list_combine_lookup_second; eauto. - rewrite a1.(arr_wf). rewrite a2.(arr_wf). - assumption. -Qed. - -Ltac inv_state := - match goal with - MSTATE : match_states _ _ |- _ => - inversion MSTATE; - match goal with - TF : tr_module _ _ |- _ => - inversion TF; - match goal with - TC : forall _ _, - Maps.PTree.get _ _ = Some _ -> tr_code _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, - H : Maps.PTree.get _ _ = Some _ |- _ => - apply TC in H; inversion H; - match goal with - TI : context[tr_instr] |- _ => - inversion TI - end - end - end -end; subst. - -Ltac unfold_func H := - match type of H with - | ?f = _ => unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H) - | ?f _ = _ => unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H) - | ?f _ _ = _ => unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H) - | ?f _ _ _ = _ => unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H) - | ?f _ _ _ _ = _ => unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H) - end. - -Lemma init_reg_assoc_empty : - forall f l, - match_assocmaps f (RTL.init_regs nil l) (HTL.init_regs nil l). -Proof. - induction l; simpl; constructor; intros. - - rewrite Registers.Regmap.gi. unfold find_assocmap. - unfold AssocMapExt.get_default. rewrite AssocMap.gempty. - constructor. - - - rewrite Registers.Regmap.gi. unfold find_assocmap. - unfold AssocMapExt.get_default. rewrite AssocMap.gempty. - constructor. -Qed. - -Lemma arr_lookup_some: - forall (z : Z) (r0 : Registers.reg) (r : Verilog.reg) (asr : assocmap) (asa : Verilog.assocmap_arr) - (stack : Array (option value)) (H5 : asa ! r = Some stack) n, - exists x, Verilog.arr_assocmap_lookup asa r n = Some x. -Proof. - intros z r0 r asr asa stack H5 n. - eexists. - unfold Verilog.arr_assocmap_lookup. rewrite H5. reflexivity. -Qed. -Hint Resolve arr_lookup_some : htlproof. - -Section CORRECTNESS. - - Variable prog : RTL.program. - Variable tprog : HTL.program. - - Hypothesis TRANSL : match_prog prog tprog. - - Lemma TRANSL' : - Linking.match_program (fun cu f tf => transl_fundef f = Errors.OK tf) eq prog tprog. - Proof. intros; apply match_prog_matches; assumption. Qed. - - Let ge : RTL.genv := Globalenvs.Genv.globalenv prog. - Let tge : HTL.genv := Globalenvs.Genv.globalenv tprog. - - Lemma symbols_preserved: - forall (s: AST.ident), Genv.find_symbol tge s = Genv.find_symbol ge s. - Proof. intros. eapply (Genv.find_symbol_match TRANSL'). Qed. - - Lemma function_ptr_translated: - forall (b: Values.block) (f: RTL.fundef), - Genv.find_funct_ptr ge b = Some f -> - exists tf, - Genv.find_funct_ptr tge b = Some tf /\ transl_fundef f = Errors.OK tf. - Proof. - intros. exploit (Genv.find_funct_ptr_match TRANSL'); eauto. - intros (cu & tf & P & Q & R); exists tf; auto. - Qed. - - Lemma functions_translated: - forall (v: Values.val) (f: RTL.fundef), - Genv.find_funct ge v = Some f -> - exists tf, - Genv.find_funct tge v = Some tf /\ transl_fundef f = Errors.OK tf. - Proof. - intros. exploit (Genv.find_funct_match TRANSL'); eauto. - intros (cu & tf & P & Q & R); exists tf; auto. - Qed. - - Lemma senv_preserved: - Senv.equiv (Genv.to_senv ge) (Genv.to_senv tge). - Proof - (Genv.senv_transf_partial TRANSL'). - Hint Resolve senv_preserved : htlproof. - - Lemma ptrofs_inj : - forall a b, - Ptrofs.unsigned a = Ptrofs.unsigned b -> a = b. - Proof. - intros. rewrite <- Ptrofs.repr_unsigned. symmetry. rewrite <- Ptrofs.repr_unsigned. - rewrite H. auto. - Qed. - - Lemma op_stack_based : - forall F V sp v m args rs op ge pc' res0 pc f e fin rtrn st stk, - tr_instr fin rtrn st stk (RTL.Iop op args res0 pc') - (Verilog.Vnonblock (Verilog.Vvar res0) e) - (state_goto st pc') -> - reg_stack_based_pointers sp rs -> - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Iop op args res0 pc') -> - @Op.eval_operation F V ge (Values.Vptr sp Ptrofs.zero) op - (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) m = Some v -> - stack_based v sp. - Proof. - Ltac solve_no_ptr := - match goal with - | H: reg_stack_based_pointers ?sp ?rs |- stack_based (Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs) _ => - solve [apply H] - | H1: reg_stack_based_pointers ?sp ?rs, H2: Registers.Regmap.get _ _ = Values.Vptr ?b ?i - |- context[Values.Vptr ?b _] => - let H := fresh "H" in - assert (H: stack_based (Values.Vptr b i) sp) by (rewrite <- H2; apply H1); simplify; solve [auto] - | |- context[Registers.Regmap.get ?lr ?lrs] => - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get lr lrs) eqn:?; simplify; auto - | |- stack_based (?f _) _ => unfold f - | |- stack_based (?f _ _) _ => unfold f - | |- stack_based (?f _ _ _) _ => unfold f - | |- stack_based (?f _ _ _ _) _ => unfold f - | H: ?f _ _ = Some _ |- _ => - unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H); inv H - | H: ?f _ _ _ _ _ _ = Some _ |- _ => - unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H); inv H - | H: map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r _) ?args = _ |- _ => - destruct args; inv H - | |- context[if ?c then _ else _] => destruct c; try discriminate - | H: match _ with _ => _ end = Some _ |- _ => repeat (unfold_match H) - | H: match _ with _ => _ end = OK _ _ _ |- _ => repeat (unfold_match H) - | |- context[match ?g with _ => _ end] => destruct g; try discriminate - | |- _ => simplify; solve [auto] - end. - intros F V sp v m args rs op g pc' res0 pc f e fin rtrn st stk INSTR RSBP SEL EVAL. - inv INSTR. unfold translate_instr in H5. - unfold_match H5; repeat (unfold_match H5); repeat (simplify; solve_no_ptr). - Qed. - - Lemma int_inj : - forall x y, - Int.unsigned x = Int.unsigned y -> - x = y. - Proof. - intros. rewrite <- Int.repr_unsigned at 1. rewrite <- Int.repr_unsigned. - rewrite <- H. trivial. - Qed. - - Ltac eval_correct_tac := - match goal with - | |- context[valueToPtr] => unfold valueToPtr - | |- context[valueToInt] => unfold valueToInt - | |- context[bop] => unfold bop - | H : context[bop] |- _ => unfold bop in H - | |- context[boplit] => unfold boplit - | H : context[boplit] |- _ => unfold boplit in H - | |- context[boplitz] => unfold boplitz - | H : context[boplitz] |- _ => unfold boplitz in H - | |- val_value_lessdef Values.Vundef _ => solve [constructor] - | H : val_value_lessdef _ _ |- val_value_lessdef (Values.Vint _) _ => constructor; inv H - | |- val_value_lessdef (Values.Vint _) _ => constructor; auto - | H : ret _ _ = OK _ _ _ |- _ => inv H - | H : context[RTL.max_reg_function ?f] - |- context[_ (Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs) (Registers.Regmap.get ?r0 ?rs)] => - let HPle1 := fresh "HPle" in - let HPle2 := fresh "HPle" in - assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - assert (HPle2 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H in HPle1; apply H in HPle2; eexists; split; - [econstructor; eauto; constructor; trivial | inv HPle1; inv HPle2; try (constructor; auto)] - | H : context[RTL.max_reg_function ?f] - |- context[_ (Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs) _] => - let HPle1 := fresh "HPle" in - assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H in HPle1; eexists; split; - [econstructor; eauto; constructor; trivial | inv HPle1; try (constructor; auto)] - | H : _ :: _ = _ :: _ |- _ => inv H - | |- context[match ?d with _ => _ end] => destruct d eqn:?; try discriminate - | H : match ?d with _ => _ end = _ |- _ => repeat unfold_match H - | H : match ?d with _ => _ end _ = _ |- _ => repeat unfold_match H - | |- Verilog.expr_runp _ _ _ _ _ => econstructor - | |- val_value_lessdef (?f _ _) _ => unfold f - | |- val_value_lessdef (?f _) _ => unfold f - | H : ?f (Registers.Regmap.get _ _) _ = Some _ |- _ => - unfold f in H; repeat (unfold_match H) - | H1 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vint _, H2 : val_value_lessdef (Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs) _ - |- _ => rewrite H1 in H2; inv H2 - | |- _ => eexists; split; try constructor; solve [eauto] - | H : context[RTL.max_reg_function ?f] |- context[_ (Verilog.Vvar ?r) (Verilog.Vvar ?r0)] => - let HPle1 := fresh "H" in - let HPle2 := fresh "H" in - assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - assert (HPle2 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H in HPle1; apply H in HPle2; eexists; split; try constructor; eauto - | H : context[RTL.max_reg_function ?f] |- context[Verilog.Vvar ?r] => - let HPle := fresh "H" in - assert (HPle : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H in HPle; eexists; split; try constructor; eauto - | |- context[if ?c then _ else _] => destruct c eqn:?; try discriminate - | H : ?b = _ |- _ = boolToValue ?b => rewrite H - end. - Ltac inv_lessdef := lazymatch goal with - | H2 : context[RTL.max_reg_function ?f], - H : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = _, - H1 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r0 ?rs = _ |- _ => - let HPle1 := fresh "HPle" in - assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H2 in HPle1; inv HPle1; - let HPle2 := fresh "HPle" in - assert (HPle2 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H2 in HPle2; inv HPle2 - | H2 : context[RTL.max_reg_function ?f], H : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = _ |- _ => - let HPle1 := fresh "HPle" in - assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H2 in HPle1; inv HPle1 - end. - Ltac solve_cond := - match goal with - | H : context[match _ with _ => _ end] |- _ => repeat (unfold_merge H) - | H : ?f = _ |- context[boolToValue ?f] => rewrite H; solve [auto] - | H : Values.Vptr _ _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vint _ |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vundef = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vint _ |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vint _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vundef |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vint _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vtrue |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vint _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vfalse |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vint _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vptr _ _ |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vundef = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vptr _ _ |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vundef = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vtrue |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vundef = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vfalse |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vptr _ _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vundef |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vptr _ _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vtrue |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | H : Values.Vptr _ _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H2 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vfalse |- _ => - rewrite H2 in H; discriminate - | |- context[val_value_lessdef Values.Vundef _] => - econstructor; split; econstructor; econstructor; auto; solve [constructor] - | H1 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vint _, - H2 : Values.Vint _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H3 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r0 ?rs = Values.Vint _, - H4 : Values.Vint _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r0 ?rs|- _ => - rewrite H1 in H2; rewrite H3 in H4; inv H2; inv H4; unfold valueToInt in *; constructor - | H1 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs = Values.Vptr _ _, - H2 : Values.Vptr _ _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r ?rs, - H3 : Registers.Regmap.get ?r0 ?rs = Values.Vptr _ _, - H4 : Values.Vptr _ _ = Registers.Regmap.get ?r0 ?rs|- _ => - rewrite H1 in H2; rewrite H3 in H4; inv H2; inv H4; unfold valueToInt in *; constructor; - unfold Ptrofs.ltu, Int.ltu in *; unfold Ptrofs.of_int in *; - repeat (rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr in *; auto using Int.unsigned_range_2) - | H : _ :: _ = _ :: _ |- _ => inv H - | H : ret _ _ = OK _ _ _ |- _ => inv H - | |- _ => - eexists; split; [ econstructor; econstructor; auto - | simplify; inv_lessdef; repeat (unfold valueToPtr, valueToInt in *; solve_cond); - unfold valueToPtr in * - ] - end. - - Lemma eval_cond_correct : - forall stk f sp pc rs m res ml st asr asa e b f' s s' args i cond, - match_states (RTL.State stk f sp pc rs m) (HTL.State res ml st asr asa) -> - (forall v, In v args -> Ple v (RTL.max_reg_function f)) -> - Op.eval_condition cond (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) m = Some b -> - translate_condition cond args s = OK e s' i -> - Verilog.expr_runp f' asr asa e (boolToValue b). - Proof. - intros stk f sp pc rs m res ml st asr asa e b f' s s' args i cond MSTATE MAX_FUN EVAL TR_INSTR. - pose proof MSTATE as MSTATE_2. inv MSTATE. - inv MASSOC. unfold translate_condition, translate_comparison, - translate_comparisonu, translate_comparison_imm, - translate_comparison_immu in TR_INSTR; - repeat unfold_match TR_INSTR; try inv TR_INSTR; simplify_val; - unfold Values.Val.cmp_bool, Values.Val.of_optbool, bop, Values.Val.cmpu_bool, - Int.cmpu in *; - repeat unfold_match EVAL. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo; simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. repeat unfold_match Heqo; simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; try solve_cond. simplify_val. - rewrite Heqv0 in H3. rewrite Heqv in H2. inv H2. inv H3. - unfold Ptrofs.ltu. unfold Int.ltu. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. auto. - - repeat econstructor. unfold Verilog.binop_run. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; simplify_val; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; try solve_cond. simplify_val. - rewrite Heqv0 in H3. rewrite Heqv in H2. inv H2. inv H3. - unfold Ptrofs.ltu. unfold Int.ltu. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. auto. - - repeat econstructor. unfold Verilog.binop_run. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; simplify_val; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; try solve_cond. simplify_val. - rewrite Heqv0 in H3. rewrite Heqv in H2. inv H2. inv H3. - unfold Ptrofs.ltu. unfold Int.ltu. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. auto. - - repeat econstructor. unfold Verilog.binop_run. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; simplify_val; solve_cond. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p0) as MAX_FUN_P0. apply H in MAX_FUN_P0; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; inv MAX_FUN_P0; try solve_cond. simplify_val. - rewrite Heqv0 in H3. rewrite Heqv in H2. inv H2. inv H3. - unfold Ptrofs.ltu. unfold Int.ltu. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by apply Int.unsigned_range_2. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - - repeat econstructor. simplify_val. - pose proof (MAX_FUN p) as MAX_FUN_P. apply H in MAX_FUN_P; auto. - inv MAX_FUN_P; simplify_val; try solve_cond. - rewrite Heqv in H0. inv H0. auto. - Qed. - - Lemma eval_cond_correct' : - forall e stk f sp pc rs m res ml st asr asa v f' s s' args i cond, - match_states (RTL.State stk f sp pc rs m) (HTL.State res ml st asr asa) -> - (forall v, In v args -> Ple v (RTL.max_reg_function f)) -> - Values.Val.of_optbool None = v -> - translate_condition cond args s = OK e s' i -> - exists v', Verilog.expr_runp f' asr asa e v' /\ val_value_lessdef v v'. - intros e stk f sp pc rs m res ml st asr asa v f' s s' args i cond MSTATE MAX_FUN EVAL TR_INSTR. - unfold translate_condition, translate_comparison, translate_comparisonu, - translate_comparison_imm, translate_comparison_immu, bop, boplit in *. - repeat unfold_match TR_INSTR; inv TR_INSTR; repeat econstructor. - Qed. - - Lemma eval_correct : - forall s sp op rs m v e asr asa f f' stk s' i pc res0 pc' args res ml st, - match_states (RTL.State stk f sp pc rs m) (HTL.State res ml st asr asa) -> - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Iop op args res0 pc') -> - Op.eval_operation ge sp op - (List.map (fun r : BinNums.positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) m = Some v -> - translate_instr op args s = OK e s' i -> - exists v', Verilog.expr_runp f' asr asa e v' /\ val_value_lessdef v v'. - Proof. - intros s sp op rs m v e asr asa f f' stk s' i pc pc' res0 args res ml st MSTATE INSTR EVAL TR_INSTR. - pose proof MSTATE as MSTATE_2. inv MSTATE. - inv MASSOC. unfold translate_instr in TR_INSTR; repeat (unfold_match TR_INSTR); inv TR_INSTR; - unfold Op.eval_operation in EVAL; repeat (unfold_match EVAL); inv EVAL; - repeat (simplify; eval_correct_tac; unfold valueToInt in *). - - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_sub as H2; unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in H2. - unfold Ptrofs.of_int. simpl. - apply ptrofs_inj. assert (Archi.ptr64 = false) by auto. eapply H2 in H3. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. apply H3. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned; auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - auto. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned; auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned; auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_sub as AGR; unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in AGR. - assert (ARCH: Archi.ptr64 = false) by auto. eapply AGR in ARCH. - apply int_inj. unfold Ptrofs.to_int. rewrite Int.unsigned_repr. - apply ARCH. pose proof Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned; auto. - pose proof Ptrofs.agree32_of_int. unfold Ptrofs.agree32 in H2. - eapply H2 in ARCH. apply ARCH. - pose proof Ptrofs.agree32_of_int. unfold Ptrofs.agree32 in H2. - eapply H2 in ARCH. apply ARCH. - - rewrite H0 in Heqb. rewrite H1 in Heqb. discriminate. - - rewrite Heqb in Heqb0. discriminate. - - rewrite H0 in Heqb. rewrite H1 in Heqb. discriminate. - - rewrite Heqb in Heqb0. discriminate. - (*- unfold Int.ror. unfold Int.or. unfold Int.shru, Int.shl, Int.sub. unfold intToValue. unfold Int.modu, - repeat (rewrite Int.unsigned_repr). auto.*) - - unfold Op.eval_addressing32 in *. repeat (unfold_match H2); inv H2. - + unfold translate_eff_addressing in *. repeat (unfold_match H1). - destruct v0; inv Heql; rewrite H2; inv H1; repeat eval_correct_tac. - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_add as AGR; unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in AGR. unfold ZToValue. - apply ptrofs_inj. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - apply AGR. auto. rewrite H2 in H0. inv H0. unfold valueToPtr. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - + unfold translate_eff_addressing in *. repeat (unfold_match H1). inv H1. - inv Heql. unfold boplitz. repeat (simplify; eval_correct_tac). - all: repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - * inv Heqv. unfold valueToInt in *. inv H2. inv H0. unfold valueToInt in *. trivial. - * constructor. unfold valueToPtr, ZToValue in *. - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_add as AGR; unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in AGR. unfold ZToValue. - apply ptrofs_inj. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - apply AGR. auto. inv Heqv. rewrite Int.add_commut. - apply AGR. auto. inv H1. inv H0. unfold valueToPtr. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - unfold Ptrofs.of_int. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. inv H0. auto. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - * constructor. unfold valueToPtr, ZToValue in *. - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_add as AGR; unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in AGR. unfold ZToValue. - apply ptrofs_inj. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - apply AGR. auto. inv Heqv. - apply AGR. auto. inv H0. unfold valueToPtr, Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - inv H1. unfold valueToPtr, Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. - apply Int.unsigned_range_2. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - + unfold translate_eff_addressing in *. repeat (unfold_match H1). inv H1. - inv Heql. unfold boplitz. repeat (simplify; eval_correct_tac). - all: repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - * unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv. repeat (unfold_match Heqv). inv Heqv. inv H3. - unfold valueToInt, ZToValue. auto. - * unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv. repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - * unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv. repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - * constructor. unfold valueToPtr, ZToValue. unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv. repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - + unfold translate_eff_addressing in *. repeat (unfold_match H1). inv H1. - inv Heql. unfold boplitz. repeat (simplify; eval_correct_tac). - all: repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - unfold valueToPtr, ZToValue. - repeat unfold_match Heqv0. unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv1. repeat unfold_match Heqv1. - inv Heqv1. inv Heqv0. unfold valueToInt in *. - assert (HPle1 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H in HPle1. inv HPle1. unfold valueToInt in *. rewrite Heqv2 in H2. inv H2. auto. - rewrite Heqv2 in H2. inv H2. - rewrite Heqv2 in H3. discriminate. - repeat unfold_match Heqv0. unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv1. repeat unfold_match Heqv1. - repeat unfold_match Heqv0. unfold Values.Val.mul in Heqv1. repeat unfold_match Heqv1. - constructor. unfold valueToPtr, ZToValue. inv Heqv0. inv Heqv1. - assert (HPle1 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H in HPle1. inv HPle1. unfold valueToInt in *. rewrite Heqv2 in H3. inv H3. - - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_add as AGR; unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in AGR. unfold ZToValue. - apply ptrofs_inj. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - apply AGR. auto. inv H2. unfold valueToPtr, Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. auto. - replace Ptrofs.max_unsigned with Int.max_unsigned by auto. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - apply Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - - rewrite Heqv2 in H3. inv H3. - - rewrite Heqv2 in H4. inv H4. - + unfold translate_eff_addressing in *. repeat (unfold_match H1). inv H1. - inv Heql. unfold boplitz. repeat (simplify; eval_correct_tac). - all: repeat (unfold_match Heqv). - eexists. split. constructor. - constructor. unfold valueToPtr, ZToValue. rewrite Ptrofs.add_zero_l. unfold Ptrofs.of_int. - rewrite Int.unsigned_repr. symmetry. apply Ptrofs.repr_unsigned. - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *. apply Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - - destruct (Op.eval_condition cond (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) m) eqn:EQ. - + exploit eval_cond_correct; eauto. intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply INSTR. auto. - intros. econstructor. econstructor. eassumption. unfold boolToValue, Values.Val.of_optbool. - destruct b; constructor; auto. - + eapply eval_cond_correct'; eauto. intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply INSTR. auto. - - monadInv H1. - destruct (Op.eval_condition c (map (fun r1 : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r1 rs) l0) m) eqn:EQN; - simplify. destruct b eqn:B. - + exploit eval_cond_correct; eauto. intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply INSTR. - simplify; tauto. intros. - econstructor. econstructor. eapply Verilog.erun_Vternary_true. eassumption. econstructor. auto. - auto. unfold Values.Val.normalize. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r rs) eqn:EQN2; constructor. - * assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H in HPle1. inv HPle1. unfold valueToInt in H1. rewrite EQN2 in H1. inv H1. auto. - rewrite EQN2 in H1. discriminate. rewrite EQN2 in H2. discriminate. - * assert (HPle1 : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H in HPle1. inv HPle1. rewrite EQN2 in H1. inv H1. rewrite EQN2 in H1. inv H1. auto. - rewrite EQN2 in H2. discriminate. - + exploit eval_cond_correct; eauto. intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply INSTR. - simplify; tauto. intros. - econstructor. econstructor. eapply Verilog.erun_Vternary_false. eassumption. econstructor. auto. - auto. unfold Values.Val.normalize. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r0 rs) eqn:EQN2; constructor. - * assert (HPle1 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H in HPle1. inv HPle1. unfold valueToInt in H1. rewrite EQN2 in H1. inv H1. auto. - rewrite EQN2 in H1. discriminate. rewrite EQN2 in H2. discriminate. - * assert (HPle1 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H in HPle1. inv HPle1. rewrite EQN2 in H1. inv H1. rewrite EQN2 in H1. inv H1. auto. - rewrite EQN2 in H2. discriminate. - + exploit eval_cond_correct'; eauto. intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply INSTR. - simplify; tauto. intros. inv H0. inv H1. destruct (Int.eq_dec x0 Int.zero). - econstructor. econstructor. eapply Verilog.erun_Vternary_false. - eassumption. econstructor. auto. subst. auto. constructor. - econstructor. econstructor. eapply Verilog.erun_Vternary_true. - eassumption. econstructor. auto. unfold valueToBool. pose proof n. apply Int.eq_false in n. - unfold uvalueToZ. unfold Int.eq in n. unfold zeq in *. - destruct (Int.unsigned x0 ==Z Int.unsigned Int.zero); try discriminate. - rewrite <- Z.eqb_neq in n0. rewrite Int.unsigned_zero in n0. rewrite n0. auto. - constructor. - Qed. - - (** The proof of semantic preservation for the translation of instructions - is a simulation argument based on diagrams of the following form: -<< - match_states - code st rs ---------------- State m st assoc - || | - || | - || | - \/ v - code st rs' --------------- State m st assoc' - match_states ->> - where [tr_code c data control fin rtrn st] is assumed to hold. - - The precondition and postcondition is that that should hold is [match_assocmaps rs assoc]. - *) - - Definition transl_instr_prop (instr : RTL.instruction) : Prop := - forall m asr asa fin rtrn st stmt trans res, - tr_instr fin rtrn st (m.(HTL.mod_stk)) instr stmt trans -> - exists asr' asa', - HTL.step tge (HTL.State res m st asr asa) Events.E0 (HTL.State res m st asr' asa'). - - Opaque combine. - - Ltac tac0 := - match goal with - | [ |- context[Verilog.merge_arrs _ _] ] => unfold Verilog.merge_arrs - | [ |- context[Verilog.merge_arr] ] => unfold Verilog.merge_arr - | [ |- context[Verilog.merge_regs _ _] ] => unfold Verilog.merge_regs; crush; unfold_merge - | [ |- context[reg_stack_based_pointers] ] => unfold reg_stack_based_pointers; intros - | [ |- context[Verilog.arr_assocmap_set _ _ _ _] ] => unfold Verilog.arr_assocmap_set - - | [ |- context[HTL.empty_stack] ] => unfold HTL.empty_stack - - | [ |- context[_ # ?d <- _ ! ?d] ] => rewrite AssocMap.gss - | [ |- context[_ # ?d <- _ ! ?s] ] => rewrite AssocMap.gso - | [ |- context[(AssocMap.empty _) ! _] ] => rewrite AssocMap.gempty - - | [ |- context[array_get_error _ (combine Verilog.merge_cell (arr_repeat None _) _)] ] => - rewrite combine_lookup_first - - | [ |- state_st_wf _ _ ] => unfold state_st_wf; inversion 1 - | [ |- context[match_states _ _] ] => econstructor; auto - | [ |- match_arrs _ _ _ _ _ ] => econstructor; auto - | [ |- match_assocmaps _ _ _ # _ <- (posToValue _) ] => - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater; [> unfold Plt; lia | assumption] - - | [ H : ?asa ! ?r = Some _ |- Verilog.arr_assocmap_lookup ?asa ?r _ = Some _ ] => - unfold Verilog.arr_assocmap_lookup; setoid_rewrite H; f_equal - | [ |- context[(AssocMap.combine _ _ _) ! _] ] => - try (rewrite AssocMap.gcombine; [> | reflexivity]) - - | [ |- context[Registers.Regmap.get ?d (Registers.Regmap.set ?d _ _)] ] => - rewrite Registers.Regmap.gss - | [ |- context[Registers.Regmap.get ?s (Registers.Regmap.set ?d _ _)] ] => - let EQ := fresh "EQ" in - destruct (Pos.eq_dec s d) as [EQ|EQ]; - [> rewrite EQ | rewrite Registers.Regmap.gso; auto] - - | [ H : opt_val_value_lessdef _ _ |- _ ] => invert H - | [ H : context[Z.of_nat (Z.to_nat _)] |- _ ] => rewrite Z2Nat.id in H; [> solve crush |] - | [ H : _ ! _ = Some _ |- _] => setoid_rewrite H - end. - - Ltac small_tac := repeat (crush_val; try array; try ptrofs); crush_val; auto. - Ltac big_tac := repeat (crush_val; try array; try ptrofs; try tac0); crush_val; auto. - - Lemma transl_inop_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : positive) - (rs : RTL.regset) (m : mem) (pc' : RTL.node), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Inop pc') -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc' rs m) R2. - Proof. - intros s f sp pc rs m pc' H R1 MSTATE. - inv_state. - - unfold match_prog in TRANSL. - econstructor. - split. - apply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - inv CONST; assumption. - inv CONST; assumption. - (* processing of state *) - econstructor. - crush. - econstructor. - econstructor. - econstructor. - - all: invert MARR; big_tac. - - inv CONST; constructor; simplify; rewrite AssocMap.gso; auto; lia. - - Unshelve. exact tt. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_inop_correct : htlproof. - - Lemma transl_iop_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : positive) - (rs : Registers.Regmap.t Values.val) (m : mem) (op : Op.operation) (args : list Registers.reg) - (res0 : Registers.reg) (pc' : RTL.node) (v : Values.val), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Iop op args res0 pc') -> - Op.eval_operation ge sp op (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) m = Some v -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc' (Registers.Regmap.set res0 v rs) m) R2. - Proof. - intros s f sp pc rs m op args res0 pc' v H H0 R1 MSTATE. - inv_state. inv MARR. - exploit eval_correct; eauto. intros. inversion H1. inversion H2. - econstructor. split. - apply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - inv CONST. assumption. - inv CONST. assumption. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - constructor; trivial. - econstructor; simpl; eauto. - simpl. econstructor. econstructor. - apply H5. simplify. - - all: big_tac. - - assert (HPle: Ple res0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - apply regs_lessdef_add_match. assumption. - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. unfold Plt; lia. assumption. - assert (HPle: Ple res0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle; lia. - eapply op_stack_based; eauto. - inv CONST. constructor; simplify. rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple res0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple res0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - Unshelve. exact tt. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_iop_correct : htlproof. - - Ltac tac := - repeat match goal with - | [ _ : error _ _ = OK _ _ _ |- _ ] => discriminate - | [ _ : context[if (?x && ?y) then _ else _] |- _ ] => - let EQ1 := fresh "EQ" in - let EQ2 := fresh "EQ" in - destruct x eqn:EQ1; destruct y eqn:EQ2; simpl in * - | [ _ : context[if ?x then _ else _] |- _ ] => - let EQ := fresh "EQ" in - destruct x eqn:EQ; simpl in * - | [ H : ret _ _ = _ |- _ ] => invert H - | [ _ : context[match ?x with | _ => _ end] |- _ ] => destruct x - end. - - Ltac inv_arr_access := - match goal with - | [ _ : translate_arr_access ?chunk ?addr ?args _ _ = OK ?c _ _ |- _] => - destruct c, chunk, addr, args; crush; tac; crush - end. - - Lemma offset_expr_ok : - forall v z, (Z.to_nat - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ v)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int (Integers.Int.repr z))) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4))) - = valueToNat (Int.divu (Int.add v (ZToValue z)) (ZToValue 4))). - Proof. - simplify_val. unfold valueToNat. unfold Int.divu, Ptrofs.divu. - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_add as AGR. - unfold Integers.Ptrofs.agree32 in AGR. - assert (Ptrofs.unsigned (Ptrofs.add (Ptrofs.repr (Int.unsigned v)) - (Ptrofs.repr (Int.unsigned (Int.repr z)))) = - Int.unsigned (Int.add v (ZToValue z))). - apply AGR; auto. - apply Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - apply Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. - rewrite H. replace (Ptrofs.unsigned (Ptrofs.repr 4)) with 4. - replace (Int.unsigned (ZToValue 4)) with 4. - pose proof Ptrofs.agree32_repr. unfold Ptrofs.agree32 in *. - rewrite H0. trivial. auto. - unfold ZToValue. symmetry. apply Int.unsigned_repr. - unfold_constants. lia. - unfold ZToValue. symmetry. apply Int.unsigned_repr. - unfold_constants. lia. - Qed. - - Lemma offset_expr_ok_2 : - forall v0 v1 z0 z1, - (Z.to_nat - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ v0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int - (Integers.Int.add - (Integers.Int.mul (valueToInt v1) (Integers.Int.repr z1)) - (Integers.Int.repr z0)))) (Ptrofs.repr 4)))) - = valueToNat (Int.divu (Int.add (Int.add v0 (ZToValue z0)) - (Int.mul v1 (ZToValue z1))) (ZToValue 4)). - intros. unfold ZToValue, valueToNat, valueToInt, Ptrofs.divu, Int.divu, Ptrofs.of_int. - - assert (H : (Ptrofs.unsigned - (Ptrofs.add (Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ v0)) - (Ptrofs.of_int (Int.add (Int.mul (valueToInt v1) (Int.repr z1)) (Int.repr z0)))) / - Ptrofs.unsigned (Ptrofs.repr 4)) - = (Int.unsigned (Int.add (Int.add v0 (Int.repr z0)) (Int.mul v1 (Int.repr z1))) / - Int.unsigned (Int.repr 4))). - { unfold ZToValue, valueToNat, valueToInt, Ptrofs.divu, Int.divu, Ptrofs.of_int. - rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr by (unfold_constants; lia). - rewrite Int.unsigned_repr by (unfold_constants; lia). - - unfold Ptrofs.of_int. rewrite Int.add_commut. - pose proof Integers.Ptrofs.agree32_add as AGR. unfold Ptrofs.agree32 in *. - erewrite AGR. - 3: { unfold uvalueToZ. rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. trivial. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. } - 3: { rewrite Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. trivial. apply Int.unsigned_range_2. } - rewrite Int.add_assoc. trivial. auto. - } - - rewrite <- H. auto. - - Qed. - - Lemma offset_expr_ok_3 : - forall OFFSET, - Z.to_nat (Ptrofs.unsigned (Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Ptrofs.repr 4))) - = valueToNat (ZToValue (Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4)). - Proof. auto. Qed. - - Lemma transl_iload_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : positive) - (rs : Registers.Regmap.t Values.val) (m : mem) (chunk : AST.memory_chunk) - (addr : Op.addressing) (args : list Registers.reg) (dst : Registers.reg) - (pc' : RTL.node) (a v : Values.val), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Iload chunk addr args dst pc') -> - Op.eval_addressing ge sp addr (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) = Some a -> - Mem.loadv chunk m a = Some v -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc' (Registers.Regmap.set dst v rs) m) R2. - Proof. - intros s f sp pc rs m chunk addr args dst pc' a v H H0 H1 R1 MSTATE. - inv_state. inv_arr_access. - - + (** Preamble *) - invert MARR. inv CONST. crush. - - unfold Op.eval_addressing in H0. - destruct (Archi.ptr64) eqn:ARCHI; crush. - - unfold reg_stack_based_pointers in RSBP. - pose proof (RSBP r0) as RSBPr0. - - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r0 rs) eqn:EQr0; crush. - - rewrite ARCHI in H1. crush. - subst. - - pose proof MASSOC as MASSOC'. - invert MASSOC'. - pose proof (H0 r0). - assert (HPler0 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; crush; eauto). - apply H0 in HPler0. - invert HPler0; try congruence. - rewrite EQr0 in H11. - invert H11. - - unfold check_address_parameter_signed in *; - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *; crush. - - remember (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ asr # r0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int (Integers.Int.repr z))) as OFFSET. - - (** Modular preservation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET mod 4 = 0) as MOD_PRESERVE. - { apply Mem.load_valid_access in H1. unfold Mem.valid_access in *. simplify. - apply Zdivide_mod. assumption. } - - (** Read bounds proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET < f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) as READ_BOUND_HIGH. - { destruct (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET <? f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) eqn:EQ; crush; auto. - unfold stack_bounds in BOUNDS. - exploit (BOUNDS (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); auto. - split; try lia; apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - small_tac. } - - (** Normalisation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr - (4 * Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4))) = OFFSET) - as NORMALISE. - { replace 4 with (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) at 1 by reflexivity. - rewrite <- PtrofsExtra.mul_unsigned. - apply PtrofsExtra.mul_divu; crush; auto. } - - (** Normalised bounds proof *) - assert (0 <= - Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) - < (RTL.fn_stacksize f / 4)) - as NORMALISE_BOUND. - { split. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - assert (HDIV: forall x y, Integers.Ptrofs.divu x y = Integers.Ptrofs.divu x y ) by reflexivity. - unfold Integers.Ptrofs.divu at 2 in HDIV. - rewrite HDIV. clear HDIV. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush. - apply Zmult_lt_reg_r with (p := 4); try lia. - repeat rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo; try lia. - apply Z.div_pos; small_tac. - apply Z.div_le_upper_bound; small_tac. } - - inversion NORMALISE_BOUND as [ NORMALISE_BOUND_LOW NORMALISE_BOUND_HIGH ]; - clear NORMALISE_BOUND. - - (** Start of proof proper *) - eexists. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. crush. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. crush. - econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. - - all: big_tac. - - 1: { - assert (HPle : Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def. eassumption. auto. - apply ZExtra.Pge_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. - } - - 2: { - assert (HPle : Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def. eassumption. auto. - apply ZExtra.Pge_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. - } - - (** Match assocmaps *) - apply regs_lessdef_add_match; big_tac. - - (** Equality proof *) - rewrite <- offset_expr_ok. - - specialize (H9 (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu - OFFSET - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)))). - exploit H9; big_tac. - - (** RSBP preservation *) - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers in ASBP. - specialize (ASBP (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)))). - exploit ASBP; big_tac. - rewrite NORMALISE in H14. rewrite HeqOFFSET in H14. rewrite H1 in H14. assumption. - constructor; simplify. rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - + (** Preamble *) - invert MARR. inv CONST. crush. - - unfold Op.eval_addressing in H0. - destruct (Archi.ptr64) eqn:ARCHI; crush. - - unfold reg_stack_based_pointers in RSBP. - pose proof (RSBP r0) as RSBPr0. - pose proof (RSBP r1) as RSBPr1. - - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r0 rs) eqn:EQr0; - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r1 rs) eqn:EQr1; crush. - - rewrite ARCHI in H1. crush. - subst. - clear RSBPr1. - - pose proof MASSOC as MASSOC'. - invert MASSOC'. - pose proof (H0 r0). - pose proof (H0 r1). - assert (HPler0 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; crush; eauto). - assert (HPler1 : Ple r1 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H8 in HPler0. - apply H11 in HPler1. - invert HPler0; invert HPler1; try congruence. - rewrite EQr0 in H13. - rewrite EQr1 in H14. - invert H13. invert H14. - clear H0. clear H8. clear H11. - - unfold check_address_parameter_signed in *; - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *; crush. - - remember (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ asr # r0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int - (Integers.Int.add (Integers.Int.mul (valueToInt asr # r1) (Integers.Int.repr z)) - (Integers.Int.repr z0)))) as OFFSET. - - (** Modular preservation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET mod 4 = 0) as MOD_PRESERVE. - { apply Mem.load_valid_access in H1. unfold Mem.valid_access in *. simplify. - apply Zdivide_mod. assumption. } - - (** Read bounds proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET < f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) as READ_BOUND_HIGH. - { destruct (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET <? f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) eqn:EQ; crush; auto. - unfold stack_bounds in BOUNDS. - exploit (BOUNDS (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); auto. - split; try lia; apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - small_tac. } - - (** Normalisation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr - (4 * Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4))) = OFFSET) - as NORMALISE. - { replace 4 with (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) at 1 by reflexivity. - rewrite <- PtrofsExtra.mul_unsigned. - apply PtrofsExtra.mul_divu; crush. } - - (** Normalised bounds proof *) - assert (0 <= - Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) - < (RTL.fn_stacksize f / 4)) - as NORMALISE_BOUND. - { split. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - assert (forall x y, Integers.Ptrofs.divu x y = Integers.Ptrofs.divu x y ) by reflexivity. - unfold Integers.Ptrofs.divu at 2 in H14. - rewrite H14. clear H14. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush. - apply Zmult_lt_reg_r with (p := 4); try lia. - repeat rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo; try lia. - apply Z.div_pos; small_tac. - apply Z.div_le_upper_bound; lia. } - - inversion NORMALISE_BOUND as [ NORMALISE_BOUND_LOW NORMALISE_BOUND_HIGH ]; - clear NORMALISE_BOUND. - - (** Start of proof proper *) - eexists. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. crush. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. crush. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. auto. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - all: big_tac. - - 1: { assert (HPle : Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def. eassumption. auto. - apply ZExtra.Pge_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. } - - 2: { assert (HPle : Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def. eassumption. auto. - apply ZExtra.Pge_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. } - - (** Match assocmaps *) - apply regs_lessdef_add_match; big_tac. - - (** Equality proof *) - rewrite <- offset_expr_ok_2. - - specialize (H9 (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu - OFFSET - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)))). - exploit H9; big_tac. - - (** RSBP preservation *) - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers in ASBP. - specialize (ASBP (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)))). - exploit ASBP; big_tac. - rewrite NORMALISE in H14. rewrite HeqOFFSET in H14. rewrite H1 in H14. assumption. - - constructor; simplify. rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - - + invert MARR. inv CONST. crush. - - unfold Op.eval_addressing in H0. - destruct (Archi.ptr64) eqn:ARCHI; crush. - rewrite ARCHI in H0. crush. - - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *; - unfold check_address_parameter_signed in *; crush. - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - rewrite ZERO in H1. clear ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l in H1. - - remember i0 as OFFSET. - - (** Modular preservation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET mod 4 = 0) as MOD_PRESERVE. - { apply Mem.load_valid_access in H1. unfold Mem.valid_access in *. simplify. - apply Zdivide_mod. assumption. } - - (** Read bounds proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET < f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) as READ_BOUND_HIGH. - { destruct (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET <? f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) eqn:?EQ; crush; auto. - unfold stack_bounds in BOUNDS. - exploit (BOUNDS (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); big_tac. } - - (** Normalisation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr - (4 * Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4))) = OFFSET) - as NORMALISE. - { replace 4 with (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) at 1 by reflexivity. - rewrite <- PtrofsExtra.mul_unsigned. - apply PtrofsExtra.mul_divu; crush. } - - (** Normalised bounds proof *) - assert (0 <= - Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) - < (RTL.fn_stacksize f / 4)) - as NORMALISE_BOUND. - { split. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - assert (forall x y, Integers.Ptrofs.divu x y = Integers.Ptrofs.divu x y ) by reflexivity. - unfold Integers.Ptrofs.divu at 2 in H0. - rewrite H0. clear H0. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush. - apply Zmult_lt_reg_r with (p := 4); try lia. - repeat rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo; try lia. - apply Z.div_pos; small_tac. - apply Z.div_le_upper_bound; lia. } - - inversion NORMALISE_BOUND as [ NORMALISE_BOUND_LOW NORMALISE_BOUND_HIGH ]; - clear NORMALISE_BOUND. - - (** Start of proof proper *) - eexists. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. crush. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. crush. - - all: big_tac. - - 1: { assert (HPle : Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def. eassumption. auto. - apply ZExtra.Pge_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. } - - 2: { assert (HPle : Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def. eassumption. auto. - apply ZExtra.Pge_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. } - - (** Match assocmaps *) - apply regs_lessdef_add_match; big_tac. - - (** Equality proof *) - rewrite <- offset_expr_ok_3. - - specialize (H9 (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu - OFFSET - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)))). - exploit H9; big_tac. - - (** RSBP preservation *) - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers in ASBP. - specialize (ASBP (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.divu OFFSET (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)))). - exploit ASBP; big_tac. - rewrite NORMALISE in H0. rewrite H1 in H0. assumption. - - constructor; simplify. rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - assert (HPle: Ple dst (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_def; eauto; simpl; auto). - unfold Ple in HPle. lia. - - Unshelve. - exact (Values.Vint (Int.repr 0)). - exact tt. - exact (Values.Vint (Int.repr 0)). - exact tt. - exact (Values.Vint (Int.repr 0)). - exact tt. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_iload_correct : htlproof. - - Lemma transl_istore_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : positive) - (rs : Registers.Regmap.t Values.val) (m : mem) (chunk : AST.memory_chunk) - (addr : Op.addressing) (args : list Registers.reg) (src : Registers.reg) - (pc' : RTL.node) (a : Values.val) (m' : mem), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Istore chunk addr args src pc') -> - Op.eval_addressing ge sp addr (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) = Some a -> - Mem.storev chunk m a (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) = Some m' -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc' rs m') R2. - Proof. - intros s f sp pc rs m chunk addr args src pc' a m' H H0 H1 R1 MSTATES. - inv_state. inv_arr_access. - - + (** Preamble *) - invert MARR. inv CONST. crush. - - unfold Op.eval_addressing in H0. - destruct (Archi.ptr64) eqn:ARCHI; crush. - - unfold reg_stack_based_pointers in RSBP. - pose proof (RSBP r0) as RSBPr0. - - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r0 rs) eqn:EQr0; crush. - - rewrite ARCHI in H1. crush. - subst. - - pose proof MASSOC as MASSOC'. - invert MASSOC'. - pose proof (H0 r0). - assert (HPler0 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; crush; eauto). - apply H8 in HPler0. - invert HPler0; try congruence. - rewrite EQr0 in H11. - invert H11. - clear H0. clear H8. - - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *; - unfold check_address_parameter_signed in *; crush. - - remember (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ asr # r0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int (Integers.Int.repr z))) as OFFSET. - - (** Modular preservation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET mod 4 = 0) as MOD_PRESERVE. - { apply Mem.store_valid_access_3 in H1. unfold Mem.valid_access in *. simplify. - apply Zdivide_mod. assumption. } - - (** Write bounds proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET < f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) as WRITE_BOUND_HIGH. - { destruct (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET <? f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) eqn:EQ; crush; auto. - unfold stack_bounds in BOUNDS. - exploit (BOUNDS (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET) (Registers.Regmap.get src rs)); big_tac. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - - (** Start of proof proper *) - eexists. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - eapply Verilog.stmnt_runp_Vnonblock_arr. crush. - econstructor. - econstructor. - econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - - all: crush. - - (** State Lookup *) - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - crush. - unfold_merge. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - (** Match states *) - econstructor; eauto. - - (** Match assocmaps *) - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. crush. unfold_merge. - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. - unfold Plt; lia. - assumption. - - (** States well formed *) - unfold state_st_wf. inversion 1. crush. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - unfold_merge. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - (** Equality proof *) - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - inversion MASSOC; revert HeqOFFSET; subst; clear MASSOC; intros HeqOFFSET. - - econstructor. - repeat split; crush. - unfold HTL.empty_stack. - crush. - unfold Verilog.merge_arrs. - - rewrite AssocMap.gcombine. - 2: { reflexivity. } - unfold Verilog.arr_assocmap_set. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. - unfold Verilog.merge_arr. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. - setoid_rewrite H7. - reflexivity. - - rewrite combine_length. - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - apply list_repeat_len. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. - rewrite H4. reflexivity. - - remember (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ asr # r0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int (Integers.Int.repr z))) as OFFSET. - - destruct (4 * ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET). - - erewrite Mem.load_store_same. - 2: { rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite e. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - rewrite HeqOFFSET. - exact H1. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - constructor. - erewrite combine_lookup_second. - simplify. - assert (HPle : Ple src (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H11 in HPle. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) eqn:EQ_SRC; constructor; invert HPle; eauto. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. auto. - - assert (HMul : 4 * ptr / 4 = Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4) by (f_equal; assumption). - rewrite Z.mul_comm in HMul. - rewrite Z_div_mult in HMul; try lia. - replace 4 with (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) in HMul by reflexivity. - rewrite <- PtrofsExtra.divu_unsigned in HMul; unfold_constants; try lia. - rewrite HMul. rewrite <- offset_expr_ok. - rewrite HeqOFFSET. - rewrite array_get_error_set_bound. - reflexivity. - unfold arr_length, arr_repeat. simpl. - rewrite list_repeat_len. rewrite HeqOFFSET in HMul. lia. - - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - simpl. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - destruct (Z_le_gt_dec (4 * ptr + 4) (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); eauto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - left; auto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - right. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; try lia. - apply ZLib.Z_mod_mult'. - rewrite Z2Nat.id in H15; try lia. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r with (p := 4) in H15; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in H15; try lia. - split; try lia. - apply Z.le_trans with (m := RTL.fn_stacksize f); crush; lia. - } - - rewrite <- offset_expr_ok. - rewrite PtrofsExtra.divu_unsigned; auto; try (unfold_constants; lia). - destruct (ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4). - apply Z.mul_cancel_r with (p := 4) in e; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in e; try lia. - rewrite combine_lookup_first. - eapply H9; eauto. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. auto. - rewrite array_gso. - unfold array_get_error. - unfold arr_repeat. - crush. - apply list_repeat_lookup. - lia. - unfold_constants. - intro. - apply Z2Nat.inj_iff in H13; rewrite HeqOFFSET in n0; try lia. - apply Z.div_pos; try lia. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO1 by reflexivity. - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers. - intros. - destruct (4 * ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET). - - crush. - erewrite Mem.load_store_same. - 2: { rewrite ZERO1. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite e. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - exact H1. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - crush. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) eqn:EQ_SRC; try constructor. - destruct (Archi.ptr64); try discriminate. - pose proof (RSBP src). rewrite EQ_SRC in H11. - assumption. - - simpl. - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. - rewrite ZERO1. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - simpl. - destruct (Z_le_gt_dec (4 * ptr + 4) (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); eauto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - left; auto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - right. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; try lia. - apply ZLib.Z_mod_mult'. - invert H11. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r with (p := 4) in H14; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in H14; try lia. - split; try lia. - apply Z.le_trans with (m := RTL.fn_stacksize f); crush; lia. - } - apply ASBP; assumption. - - unfold stack_bounds in *. intros. - simpl. - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - right. right. simpl. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush; try lia. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; crush; try lia. } - crush. - exploit (BOUNDS ptr); try lia. intros. crush. - exploit (BOUNDS ptr v); try lia. intros. - invert H11. - match goal with | |- ?x = _ => destruct x eqn:EQ end; try reflexivity. - assert (Mem.valid_access m AST.Mint32 sp' - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr))) Writable). - { pose proof H1. eapply Mem.store_valid_access_2 in H11. - exact H11. eapply Mem.store_valid_access_3. eassumption. } - pose proof (Mem.valid_access_store m AST.Mint32 sp' - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr))) v). - apply X in H11. invert H11. congruence. - - constructor; simplify. unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - - + (** Preamble *) - invert MARR. inv CONST. crush. - - unfold Op.eval_addressing in H0. - destruct (Archi.ptr64) eqn:ARCHI; crush. - - unfold reg_stack_based_pointers in RSBP. - pose proof (RSBP r0) as RSBPr0. - pose proof (RSBP r1) as RSBPr1. - - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r0 rs) eqn:EQr0; - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get r1 rs) eqn:EQr1; crush. - - rewrite ARCHI in H1. crush. - subst. - clear RSBPr1. - - pose proof MASSOC as MASSOC'. - invert MASSOC'. - pose proof (H0 r0). - pose proof (H0 r1). - assert (HPler0 : Ple r0 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; crush; eauto). - assert (HPler1 : Ple r1 (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto). - apply H8 in HPler0. - apply H11 in HPler1. - invert HPler0; invert HPler1; try congruence. - rewrite EQr0 in H13. - rewrite EQr1 in H14. - invert H13. invert H14. - clear H0. clear H8. clear H11. - - unfold check_address_parameter_signed in *; - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *; crush. - - remember (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ asr # r0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int - (Integers.Int.add (Integers.Int.mul (valueToInt asr # r1) (Integers.Int.repr z)) - (Integers.Int.repr z0)))) as OFFSET. - - (** Modular preservation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET mod 4 = 0) as MOD_PRESERVE. - { apply Mem.store_valid_access_3 in H1. unfold Mem.valid_access in *. simplify. - apply Zdivide_mod. assumption. } - - (** Write bounds proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET < f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) as WRITE_BOUND_HIGH. - { destruct (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET <? f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) eqn:EQ; crush; auto. - unfold stack_bounds in BOUNDS. - exploit (BOUNDS (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET) (Registers.Regmap.get src rs)); auto. - split; try lia; apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - small_tac. } - - (** Start of proof proper *) - eexists. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - eapply Verilog.stmnt_runp_Vnonblock_arr. crush. - econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - - all: crush. - - (** State Lookup *) - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - crush. - unfold_merge. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - (** Match states *) - econstructor; eauto. - - (** Match assocmaps *) - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. crush. unfold_merge. - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. - unfold Plt; lia. - assumption. - - (** States well formed *) - unfold state_st_wf. inversion 1. crush. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - unfold_merge. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - (** Equality proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - inversion MASSOC; revert HeqOFFSET; subst; clear MASSOC; intros HeqOFFSET. - - econstructor. - repeat split; crush. - unfold HTL.empty_stack. - crush. - unfold Verilog.merge_arrs. - - rewrite AssocMap.gcombine. - 2: { reflexivity. } - unfold Verilog.arr_assocmap_set. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. - unfold Verilog.merge_arr. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. - setoid_rewrite H7. - reflexivity. - - rewrite combine_length. - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - apply list_repeat_len. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. - rewrite H4. reflexivity. - - remember (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (uvalueToZ asr # r0)) - (Integers.Ptrofs.of_int - (Integers.Int.add (Integers.Int.mul (valueToInt asr # r1) (Integers.Int.repr z)) - (Integers.Int.repr z0)))) as OFFSET. - destruct (4 * ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET). - - erewrite Mem.load_store_same. - 2: { rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite e. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - rewrite HeqOFFSET. - exact H1. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - constructor. - erewrite combine_lookup_second. - simpl. - assert (Ple src (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H14 in H15. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) eqn:EQ_SRC; constructor; invert H15; eauto. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. auto. - - assert (4 * ptr / 4 = Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4) by (f_equal; assumption). - rewrite Z.mul_comm in H15. - rewrite Z_div_mult in H15; try lia. - replace 4 with (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) in H15 by reflexivity. - rewrite <- PtrofsExtra.divu_unsigned in H15; unfold_constants; try lia. - rewrite H15. rewrite <- offset_expr_ok_2. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. - rewrite array_get_error_set_bound. - reflexivity. - unfold arr_length, arr_repeat. simpl. - rewrite list_repeat_len. lia. - - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - simpl. - destruct (Z_le_gt_dec (4 * ptr + 4) (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); eauto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - left; auto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - right. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; try lia. - apply ZLib.Z_mod_mult'. - rewrite Z2Nat.id in H17; try lia. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r with (p := 4) in H17; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in H17; try lia. - split; try lia. - apply Z.le_trans with (m := RTL.fn_stacksize f); crush; lia. - } - - rewrite <- offset_expr_ok_2. - rewrite PtrofsExtra.divu_unsigned; auto; try (unfold_constants; lia). - destruct (ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4). - apply Z.mul_cancel_r with (p := 4) in e; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in e; try lia. - rewrite combine_lookup_first. - eapply H9; eauto. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. auto. - rewrite array_gso. - unfold array_get_error. - unfold arr_repeat. - crush. - apply list_repeat_lookup. - lia. - unfold_constants. - intro. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. - apply Z2Nat.inj_iff in H15; try lia. - apply Z.div_pos; try lia. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO1 by reflexivity. - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers. - intros. - destruct (4 * ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET). - - crush. - erewrite Mem.load_store_same. - 2: { rewrite ZERO1. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite e. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - exact H1. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - crush. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) eqn:EQ_SRC; try constructor. - destruct (Archi.ptr64); try discriminate. - pose proof (RSBP src). rewrite EQ_SRC in H14. - assumption. - - simpl. - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. - rewrite ZERO1. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - simpl. - destruct (Z_le_gt_dec (4 * ptr + 4) (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); eauto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - left; auto. - rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - right. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; try lia. - apply ZLib.Z_mod_mult'. - invert H14. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r with (p := 4) in H16; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in H16; try lia. - split; try lia. - apply Z.le_trans with (m := RTL.fn_stacksize f); crush; lia. - } - apply ASBP; assumption. - - unfold stack_bounds in *. intros. - simpl. - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { rewrite HeqOFFSET in *. simplify_val. - right. right. simpl. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush; try lia. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; crush; try lia. } - crush. - exploit (BOUNDS ptr); try lia. intros. crush. - exploit (BOUNDS ptr v); try lia. intros. - simplify. - match goal with | |- ?x = _ => destruct x eqn:EQ end; try reflexivity. - assert (Mem.valid_access m AST.Mint32 sp' - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr))) Writable). - { pose proof H1. eapply Mem.store_valid_access_2 in H14. - exact H14. eapply Mem.store_valid_access_3. eassumption. } - pose proof (Mem.valid_access_store m AST.Mint32 sp' - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr))) v). - apply X in H14. invert H14. congruence. - - constructor; simplify. unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - - + invert MARR. inv CONST. crush. - - unfold Op.eval_addressing in H0. - destruct (Archi.ptr64) eqn:ARCHI; crush. - rewrite ARCHI in H0. crush. - - unfold check_address_parameter_unsigned in *; - unfold check_address_parameter_signed in *; crush. - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - rewrite ZERO in H1. clear ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l in H1. - - remember i0 as OFFSET. - - (** Modular preservation proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET mod 4 = 0) as MOD_PRESERVE. - { apply Mem.store_valid_access_3 in H1. unfold Mem.valid_access in *. simplify. - apply Zdivide_mod. assumption. } - - (** Write bounds proof *) - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET < f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) as WRITE_BOUND_HIGH. - { destruct (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET <? f.(RTL.fn_stacksize)) eqn:?EQ; crush; auto. - unfold stack_bounds in BOUNDS. - exploit (BOUNDS (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET) (Registers.Regmap.get src rs)); auto. - crush. - replace (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) with (Integers.Ptrofs.zero) by reflexivity. - small_tac. } - - (** Start of proof proper *) - eexists. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - eapply Verilog.stmnt_runp_Vnonblock_arr. crush. - econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. econstructor. - - all: crush. - - (** State Lookup *) - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - crush. - unfold_merge. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - (** Match states *) - econstructor; eauto. - - (** Match assocmaps *) - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. crush. unfold_merge. - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. - unfold Plt; lia. - assumption. - - (** States well formed *) - unfold state_st_wf. inversion 1. crush. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - unfold_merge. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - (** Equality proof *) - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - inversion MASSOC; revert HeqOFFSET; subst; clear MASSOC; intros HeqOFFSET. - - econstructor. - repeat split; crush. - unfold HTL.empty_stack. - crush. - unfold Verilog.merge_arrs. - - rewrite AssocMap.gcombine. - 2: { reflexivity. } - unfold Verilog.arr_assocmap_set. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. - unfold Verilog.merge_arr. - rewrite AssocMap.gss. - setoid_rewrite H7. - reflexivity. - - rewrite combine_length. - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - apply list_repeat_len. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. - rewrite H4. reflexivity. - - remember i0 as OFFSET. - destruct (4 * ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET). - - erewrite Mem.load_store_same. - 2: { rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite e. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - exact H1. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - constructor. - erewrite combine_lookup_second. - simpl. - assert (Ple src (RTL.max_reg_function f)) - by (eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use; eauto; simpl; auto); - apply H0 in H8. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) eqn:EQ_SRC; constructor; invert H8; eauto. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. auto. - - assert (4 * ptr / 4 = Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4) by (f_equal; assumption). - rewrite Z.mul_comm in H8. - rewrite Z_div_mult in H8; try lia. - replace 4 with (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 4)) in H8 by reflexivity. - rewrite <- PtrofsExtra.divu_unsigned in H8; unfold_constants; try lia. - rewrite H8. rewrite <- offset_expr_ok_3. - rewrite array_get_error_set_bound. - reflexivity. - unfold arr_length, arr_repeat. simpl. - rewrite list_repeat_len. lia. - - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - simpl. - destruct (Z_le_gt_dec (4 * ptr + 4) (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); eauto. - right. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; try lia. - apply ZLib.Z_mod_mult'. - rewrite Z2Nat.id in H13; try lia. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r with (p := 4) in H13; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in H13; try lia. - split; try lia. - apply Z.le_trans with (m := RTL.fn_stacksize f); crush; lia. - } - - rewrite <- offset_expr_ok_3. - rewrite PtrofsExtra.divu_unsigned; auto; try (unfold_constants; lia). - destruct (ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET / 4). - apply Z.mul_cancel_r with (p := 4) in e; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in e; try lia. - rewrite combine_lookup_first. - eapply H9; eauto. - - rewrite <- array_set_len. - unfold arr_repeat. crush. - rewrite list_repeat_len. auto. - rewrite array_gso. - unfold array_get_error. - unfold arr_repeat. - crush. - apply list_repeat_lookup. - lia. - unfold_constants. - intro. - apply Z2Nat.inj_iff in H8; try lia. - apply Z.div_pos; try lia. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range. - - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers. - intros. - destruct (4 * ptr ==Z Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET). - - crush. - erewrite Mem.load_store_same. - 2: { rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite e. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - exact H1. - apply Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_range_2. } - crush. - destruct (Registers.Regmap.get src rs) eqn:EQ_SRC; try constructor. - destruct (Archi.ptr64); try discriminate. - pose proof (RSBP src). rewrite EQ_SRC in H0. - assumption. - - simpl. - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr. - simpl. - destruct (Z_le_gt_dec (4 * ptr + 4) (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned OFFSET)); eauto. - right. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; try lia. - apply ZLib.Z_mod_mult'. - invert H0. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r with (p := 4) in H11; try lia. - rewrite ZLib.div_mul_undo in H11; try lia. - split; try lia. - apply Z.le_trans with (m := RTL.fn_stacksize f); crush; lia. - } - apply ASBP; assumption. - - unfold stack_bounds in *. intros. - simpl. - assert (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0 = Integers.Ptrofs.zero) as ZERO by reflexivity. - erewrite Mem.load_store_other with (m1 := m). - 2: { exact H1. } - 2: { right. right. simpl. - rewrite ZERO. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.add_zero_l. - rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; crush; try lia. - apply ZExtra.mod_0_bounds; crush; try lia. } - crush. - exploit (BOUNDS ptr); try lia. intros. crush. - exploit (BOUNDS ptr v); try lia. intros. - invert H0. - match goal with | |- ?x = _ => destruct x eqn:?EQ end; try reflexivity. - assert (Mem.valid_access m AST.Mint32 sp' - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr))) Writable). - { pose proof H1. eapply Mem.store_valid_access_2 in H0. - exact H0. eapply Mem.store_valid_access_3. eassumption. } - pose proof (Mem.valid_access_store m AST.Mint32 sp' - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned - (Integers.Ptrofs.add (Integers.Ptrofs.repr 0) - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr ptr))) v). - apply X in H0. invert H0. congruence. - - constructor; simplify. unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - assumption. lia. - - Unshelve. - exact tt. - exact (Values.Vint (Int.repr 0)). - exact tt. - exact (Values.Vint (Int.repr 0)). - exact tt. - exact (Values.Vint (Int.repr 0)). - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_istore_correct : htlproof. - - Lemma transl_icond_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : positive) - (rs : Registers.Regmap.t Values.val) (m : mem) (cond : Op.condition) (args : list Registers.reg) - (ifso ifnot : RTL.node) (b : bool) (pc' : RTL.node), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Icond cond args ifso ifnot) -> - Op.eval_condition cond (map (fun r : positive => Registers.Regmap.get r rs) args) m = Some b -> - pc' = (if b then ifso else ifnot) -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc' rs m) R2. - Proof. - intros s f sp pc rs m cond args ifso ifnot b pc' H H0 H1 R1 MSTATE. - inv_state. - destruct b. - - eexists. split. apply Smallstep.plus_one. - clear H33. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - inv CONST; assumption. - inv CONST; assumption. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - constructor; trivial. - eapply Verilog.erun_Vternary_true; simpl; eauto. - eapply eval_cond_correct; eauto. intros. - intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply H22. auto. - econstructor. auto. - simpl. econstructor. unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. simpl. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - inv MARR. inv CONST. - big_tac. - constructor; rewrite AssocMap.gso; simplify; try assumption; lia. - - eexists. split. apply Smallstep.plus_one. - clear H32. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - inv CONST; assumption. - inv CONST; assumption. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - constructor; trivial. - eapply Verilog.erun_Vternary_false; simpl; eauto. - eapply eval_cond_correct; eauto. intros. - intros. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. apply H22. auto. - econstructor. auto. - simpl. econstructor. unfold Verilog.merge_regs. unfold_merge. simpl. - apply AssocMap.gss. - - inv MARR. inv CONST. - big_tac. - constructor; rewrite AssocMap.gso; simplify; try assumption; lia. - - Unshelve. all: exact tt. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_icond_correct : htlproof. - - (*Lemma transl_ijumptable_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : positive) - (rs : Registers.Regmap.t Values.val) (m : mem) (arg : Registers.reg) (tbl : list RTL.node) - (n : Integers.Int.int) (pc' : RTL.node), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Ijumptable arg tbl) -> - Registers.Regmap.get arg rs = Values.Vint n -> - list_nth_z tbl (Integers.Int.unsigned n) = Some pc' -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc' rs m) R2. - Proof. - intros s f sp pc rs m arg tbl n pc' H H0 H1 R1 MSTATE. - - Hint Resolve transl_ijumptable_correct : htlproof.*) - - Lemma transl_ireturn_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (stk : Values.block) - (pc : positive) (rs : RTL.regset) (m : mem) (or : option Registers.reg) - (m' : mem), - (RTL.fn_code f) ! pc = Some (RTL.Ireturn or) -> - Mem.free m stk 0 (RTL.fn_stacksize f) = Some m' -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.State s f (Values.Vptr stk Integers.Ptrofs.zero) pc rs m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ - match_states (RTL.Returnstate s (Registers.regmap_optget or Values.Vundef rs) m') R2. - Proof. - intros s f stk pc rs m or m' H H0 R1 MSTATE. - inv_state. - - - econstructor. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_two. - - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - inv CONST; assumption. - inv CONST; assumption. - constructor. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - constructor. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - constructor. - - constructor. constructor. - - unfold state_st_wf in WF; big_tac; eauto. - destruct wf as [HCTRL HDATA]. apply HCTRL. - apply AssocMapExt.elements_iff. eexists. - match goal with H: control ! pc = Some _ |- _ => apply H end. - - apply HTL.step_finish. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - unfold_merge; simpl. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. - apply AssocMap.gss. lia. - apply AssocMap.gss. - rewrite Events.E0_left. reflexivity. - - constructor; auto. - constructor. - - (* FIXME: Duplication *) - - econstructor. split. - eapply Smallstep.plus_two. - eapply HTL.step_module; eauto. - inv CONST; assumption. - inv CONST; assumption. - constructor. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - econstructor; simpl; trivial. - constructor. constructor. constructor. - constructor. constructor. constructor. - - unfold state_st_wf in WF; big_tac; eauto. - - destruct wf as [HCTRL HDATA]. apply HCTRL. - apply AssocMapExt.elements_iff. eexists. - match goal with H: control ! pc = Some _ |- _ => apply H end. - - apply HTL.step_finish. - unfold Verilog.merge_regs. - unfold_merge. - rewrite AssocMap.gso. - apply AssocMap.gss. simpl; lia. - apply AssocMap.gss. - rewrite Events.E0_left. trivial. - - constructor; auto. - - simpl. inversion MASSOC. subst. - unfold find_assocmap, AssocMapExt.get_default. rewrite AssocMap.gso. - apply H1. eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. eauto. simpl; tauto. - assert (HPle : Ple r (RTL.max_reg_function f)). - eapply RTL.max_reg_function_use. eassumption. simpl; auto. - apply ZExtra.Ple_not_eq. apply ZExtra.Ple_Plt_Succ. assumption. - - Unshelve. - all: constructor. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_ireturn_correct : htlproof. - - Lemma transl_callstate_correct: - forall (s : list RTL.stackframe) (f : RTL.function) (args : list Values.val) - (m : mem) (m' : Mem.mem') (stk : Values.block), - Mem.alloc m 0 (RTL.fn_stacksize f) = (m', stk) -> - forall R1 : HTL.state, - match_states (RTL.Callstate s (AST.Internal f) args m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ - match_states - (RTL.State s f (Values.Vptr stk Integers.Ptrofs.zero) (RTL.fn_entrypoint f) - (RTL.init_regs args (RTL.fn_params f)) m') R2. - Proof. - intros s f args m m' stk H R1 MSTATE. - - inversion MSTATE; subst. inversion TF; subst. - econstructor. split. apply Smallstep.plus_one. - eapply HTL.step_call. crush. - - apply match_state with (sp' := stk); eauto. - - all: big_tac. - - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. unfold Plt; lia. - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. unfold Plt; lia. - apply regs_lessdef_add_greater. unfold Plt; lia. - apply init_reg_assoc_empty. - - constructor. - - destruct (Mem.load AST.Mint32 m' stk - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.add - Integers.Ptrofs.zero - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (4 * ptr))))) eqn:LOAD. - pose proof Mem.load_alloc_same as LOAD_ALLOC. - pose proof H as ALLOC. - eapply LOAD_ALLOC in ALLOC. - 2: { exact LOAD. } - ptrofs. rewrite LOAD. - rewrite ALLOC. - repeat constructor. - - ptrofs. rewrite LOAD. - repeat constructor. - - unfold reg_stack_based_pointers. intros. - unfold RTL.init_regs; crush. - destruct (RTL.fn_params f); - rewrite Registers.Regmap.gi; constructor. - - unfold arr_stack_based_pointers. intros. - crush. - destruct (Mem.load AST.Mint32 m' stk - (Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned (Integers.Ptrofs.add - Integers.Ptrofs.zero - (Integers.Ptrofs.repr (4 * ptr))))) eqn:LOAD. - pose proof Mem.load_alloc_same as LOAD_ALLOC. - pose proof H as ALLOC. - eapply LOAD_ALLOC in ALLOC. - 2: { exact LOAD. } - rewrite ALLOC. - repeat constructor. - constructor. - - Transparent Mem.alloc. (* TODO: Since there are opaque there's probably a lemma. *) - Transparent Mem.load. - Transparent Mem.store. - unfold stack_bounds. - split. - - unfold Mem.alloc in H. - invert H. - crush. - unfold Mem.load. - intros. - match goal with | |- context[if ?x then _ else _] => destruct x end; try congruence. - invert v0. unfold Mem.range_perm in H4. - unfold Mem.perm in H4. crush. - unfold Mem.perm_order' in H4. - small_tac. - exploit (H4 ptr). rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; small_tac. intros. - rewrite Maps.PMap.gss in H8. - match goal with | H8 : context[if ?x then _ else _] |- _ => destruct x eqn:EQ end; try contradiction. - crush. - apply proj_sumbool_true in H10. lia. - - unfold Mem.alloc in H. - invert H. - crush. - unfold Mem.store. - intros. - match goal with | |- context[if ?x then _ else _] => destruct x end; try congruence. - invert v0. unfold Mem.range_perm in H4. - unfold Mem.perm in H4. crush. - unfold Mem.perm_order' in H4. - small_tac. - exploit (H4 ptr). rewrite Integers.Ptrofs.unsigned_repr; small_tac. intros. - rewrite Maps.PMap.gss in H8. - match goal with | H8 : context[if ?x then _ else _] |- _ => destruct x eqn:EQ end; try contradiction. - crush. - apply proj_sumbool_true in H10. lia. - constructor. simplify. rewrite AssocMap.gss. - simplify. rewrite AssocMap.gso. apply AssocMap.gss. simplify. lia. - Opaque Mem.alloc. - Opaque Mem.load. - Opaque Mem.store. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_callstate_correct : htlproof. - - Lemma transl_returnstate_correct: - forall (res0 : Registers.reg) (f : RTL.function) (sp : Values.val) (pc : RTL.node) - (rs : RTL.regset) (s : list RTL.stackframe) (vres : Values.val) (m : mem) - (R1 : HTL.state), - match_states (RTL.Returnstate (RTL.Stackframe res0 f sp pc rs :: s) vres m) R1 -> - exists R2 : HTL.state, - Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 Events.E0 R2 /\ - match_states (RTL.State s f sp pc (Registers.Regmap.set res0 vres rs) m) R2. - Proof. - intros res0 f sp pc rs s vres m R1 MSTATE. - inversion MSTATE. inversion MF. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_returnstate_correct : htlproof. - - Lemma option_inv : - forall A x y, - @Some A x = Some y -> x = y. - Proof. intros. inversion H. trivial. Qed. - - Lemma main_tprog_internal : - forall b, - Globalenvs.Genv.find_symbol tge tprog.(AST.prog_main) = Some b -> - exists f, Genv.find_funct_ptr (Genv.globalenv tprog) b = Some (AST.Internal f). - Proof. - intros. - destruct TRANSL. unfold main_is_internal in H1. - repeat (unfold_match H1). replace b with b0. - exploit function_ptr_translated; eauto. intros [tf [A B]]. - unfold transl_fundef, AST.transf_partial_fundef, Errors.bind in B. - unfold_match B. inv B. econstructor. apply A. - - apply option_inv. rewrite <- Heqo. rewrite <- H. - rewrite symbols_preserved. replace (AST.prog_main tprog) with (AST.prog_main prog). - trivial. symmetry; eapply Linking.match_program_main; eauto. - Qed. - - Lemma transl_initial_states : - forall s1 : Smallstep.state (RTL.semantics prog), - Smallstep.initial_state (RTL.semantics prog) s1 -> - exists s2 : Smallstep.state (HTL.semantics tprog), - Smallstep.initial_state (HTL.semantics tprog) s2 /\ match_states s1 s2. - Proof. - induction 1. - destruct TRANSL. unfold main_is_internal in H4. - repeat (unfold_match H4). - assert (f = AST.Internal f1). apply option_inv. - rewrite <- Heqo0. rewrite <- H1. replace b with b0. - auto. apply option_inv. rewrite <- H0. rewrite <- Heqo. - trivial. - exploit function_ptr_translated; eauto. - intros [tf [A B]]. - unfold transl_fundef, Errors.bind in B. - unfold AST.transf_partial_fundef, Errors.bind in B. - repeat (unfold_match B). inversion B. subst. - exploit main_tprog_internal; eauto; intros. - rewrite symbols_preserved. replace (AST.prog_main tprog) with (AST.prog_main prog). - apply Heqo. symmetry; eapply Linking.match_program_main; eauto. - inversion H5. - econstructor; split. econstructor. - apply (Genv.init_mem_transf_partial TRANSL'); eauto. - replace (AST.prog_main tprog) with (AST.prog_main prog). - rewrite symbols_preserved; eauto. - symmetry; eapply Linking.match_program_main; eauto. - apply H6. - - constructor. - apply transl_module_correct. - assert (Some (AST.Internal x) = Some (AST.Internal m)). - replace (AST.fundef HTL.module) with (HTL.fundef). - rewrite <- H6. setoid_rewrite <- A. trivial. - trivial. inv H7. assumption. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_initial_states : htlproof. - - Lemma transl_final_states : - forall (s1 : Smallstep.state (RTL.semantics prog)) - (s2 : Smallstep.state (HTL.semantics tprog)) - (r : Integers.Int.int), - match_states s1 s2 -> - Smallstep.final_state (RTL.semantics prog) s1 r -> - Smallstep.final_state (HTL.semantics tprog) s2 r. - Proof. - intros. inv H0. inv H. inv H4. invert MF. constructor. reflexivity. - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_final_states : htlproof. - - Theorem transl_step_correct: - forall (S1 : RTL.state) t S2, - RTL.step ge S1 t S2 -> - forall (R1 : HTL.state), - match_states S1 R1 -> - exists R2, Smallstep.plus HTL.step tge R1 t R2 /\ match_states S2 R2. - Proof. - induction 1; eauto with htlproof; (intros; inv_state). - Qed. - Hint Resolve transl_step_correct : htlproof. - - Theorem transf_program_correct: - Smallstep.forward_simulation (RTL.semantics prog) (HTL.semantics tprog). - Proof. - eapply Smallstep.forward_simulation_plus; eauto with htlproof. - apply senv_preserved. - Qed. - -End CORRECTNESS. |