aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Monniaux <david.monniaux@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>2020-03-24 20:47:36 +0100
committerDavid Monniaux <david.monniaux@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>2020-03-24 21:12:27 +0100
commitb59b1c908b1f412591accba7d2ecb5818062c3f9 (patch)
tree407b30d569dddf20e5a40180132bbe8ea54d0176 /aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v
parentee7cd36732efd3af91f8d6cb9be18a58e0ff43a3 (diff)
downloadcompcert-kvx-b59b1c908b1f412591accba7d2ecb5818062c3f9.tar.gz
compcert-kvx-b59b1c908b1f412591accba7d2ecb5818062c3f9.zip
progress in proofs about RA
Diffstat (limited to 'aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v')
-rw-r--r--aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v73
1 files changed, 57 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v b/aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v
index 6d44bcc8..c85543f3 100644
--- a/aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v
+++ b/aarch64/Asmgenproof1.v
@@ -22,6 +22,37 @@ Local Transparent Archi.ptr64.
(** Properties of registers *)
+Lemma preg_of_not_RA:
+ forall r, (preg_of r) <> RA.
+Proof.
+ destruct r; discriminate.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma RA_not_written:
+ forall (rs : regset) dst v,
+ rs # (preg_of dst) <- v RA = rs RA.
+Proof.
+ intros.
+ apply Pregmap.gso.
+ intro.
+ symmetry in H.
+ exact (preg_of_not_RA dst H).
+Qed.
+
+Hint Resolve RA_not_written : asmgen.
+
+Lemma RA_not_written2:
+ forall (rs : regset) dst v i,
+ preg_of dst = i ->
+ rs # i <- v RA = rs RA.
+Proof.
+ intros.
+ subst i.
+ apply RA_not_written.
+Qed.
+
+Hint Resolve RA_not_written2 : asmgen.
+
Lemma preg_of_iregsp_not_PC: forall r, preg_of_iregsp r <> PC.
Proof.
destruct r; simpl; congruence.
@@ -1347,13 +1378,15 @@ Ltac TranslOpSimpl :=
[ apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto | reflexivity]
| split; [ rewrite ? transl_eval_shift, ? transl_eval_shiftl;
apply Val.lessdef_same; Simpl; fail
- | intros; Simpl; fail ] ].
+ | split; [ intros; Simpl; fail
+ | intros; Simpl; eapply RA_not_written2; eauto] ]].
Ltac TranslOpBase :=
econstructor; split;
[ apply exec_straight_one; [simpl; eauto | reflexivity]
| split; [ rewrite ? transl_eval_shift, ? transl_eval_shiftl; Simpl
- | intros; Simpl; fail ] ].
+ | split; [ intros; Simpl; fail
+ | intros; Simpl; eapply RA_not_written2; eauto] ]].
Lemma transl_op_correct:
forall op args res k (rs: regset) m v c,
@@ -1362,15 +1395,15 @@ Lemma transl_op_correct:
exists rs',
exec_straight ge fn c rs m k rs' m
/\ Val.lessdef v rs'#(preg_of res)
- /\ forall r, data_preg r = true -> r <> preg_of res -> preg_notin r (destroyed_by_op op) -> rs' r = rs r.
+ /\ (forall r, data_preg r = true -> r <> preg_of res -> preg_notin r (destroyed_by_op op) -> rs' r = rs r)
+ /\ rs' RA = rs RA.
Proof.
Local Opaque Int.eq Int64.eq Val.add Val.addl Int.zwordsize Int64.zwordsize.
intros until c; intros TR EV.
unfold transl_op in TR; destruct op; ArgsInv; simpl in EV; SimplEval EV; try TranslOpSimpl.
- (* move *)
destruct (preg_of res) eqn:RR; try discriminate; destruct (preg_of m0) eqn:R1; inv TR.
-+ TranslOpSimpl.
-+ TranslOpSimpl.
+ all: TranslOpSimpl.
- (* intconst *)
exploit exec_loadimm32. intros (rs' & A & B & C).
exists rs'; split. eexact A. split. rewrite B; auto. intros; auto with asmgen.
@@ -1712,7 +1745,7 @@ Lemma loadptr_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs dst k m v (rs: regset),
exists rs',
exec_straight ge fn (loadptr base ofs dst k) rs m k rs' m
/\ rs'#dst = v
- /\ forall r, r <> PC -> r <> X16 -> r <> dst -> rs' r = rs r.
+ /\ (forall r, r <> PC -> r <> X16 -> r <> dst -> rs' r = rs r).
Proof.
intros.
destruct (Val.offset_ptr rs#base ofs) eqn:V; try discriminate.
@@ -1720,7 +1753,8 @@ Proof.
econstructor; split.
eapply exec_straight_opt_right. eexact A.
apply exec_straight_one. simpl. unfold exec_load. rewrite B, H. eauto. auto.
- split. Simpl. intros; Simpl.
+ split. Simpl.
+ intros; Simpl.
Qed.
Lemma storeptr_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs (src: ireg) k m m' (rs: regset),
@@ -1729,7 +1763,8 @@ Lemma storeptr_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs (src: ireg) k m m' (rs: regset
src <> X16 ->
exists rs',
exec_straight ge fn (storeptr src base ofs k) rs m k rs' m'
- /\ forall r, r <> PC -> r <> X16 -> rs' r = rs r.
+ /\ (forall r, r <> PC -> r <> X16 -> rs' r = rs r)
+ /\ rs' RA = rs RA.
Proof.
intros.
destruct (Val.offset_ptr rs#base ofs) eqn:V; try discriminate.
@@ -1737,7 +1772,7 @@ Proof.
econstructor; split.
eapply exec_straight_opt_right. eexact A.
apply exec_straight_one. simpl. unfold exec_store. rewrite B, C, H by eauto with asmgen. eauto. auto.
- intros; Simpl.
+ split; intros; Simpl.
Qed.
Lemma loadind_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs ty dst k c (rs: regset) m v,
@@ -1747,7 +1782,8 @@ Lemma loadind_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs ty dst k c (rs: regset) m v,
exists rs',
exec_straight ge fn c rs m k rs' m
/\ rs'#(preg_of dst) = v
- /\ forall r, data_preg r = true -> r <> preg_of dst -> rs' r = rs r.
+ /\ (forall r, data_preg r = true -> r <> preg_of dst -> rs' r = rs r)
+ /\ rs' RA = rs RA.
Proof.
intros.
destruct (Val.offset_ptr rs#base ofs) eqn:V; try discriminate.
@@ -1763,7 +1799,10 @@ Proof.
econstructor; split.
eapply exec_straight_opt_right. eexact A.
apply exec_straight_one. rewrite SEM. unfold exec_load. rewrite B, H0. eauto. Simpl.
- split. Simpl. intros; Simpl.
+ split. Simpl.
+ split. intros; Simpl.
+ Simpl. rewrite RA_not_written.
+ apply C; congruence.
Qed.
Lemma storeind_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs ty src k c (rs: regset) m m',
@@ -1772,7 +1811,8 @@ Lemma storeind_correct: forall (base: iregsp) ofs ty src k c (rs: regset) m m',
preg_of_iregsp base <> IR X16 ->
exists rs',
exec_straight ge fn c rs m k rs' m'
- /\ forall r, data_preg r = true -> rs' r = rs r.
+ /\ (forall r, data_preg r = true -> rs' r = rs r)
+ /\ rs' RA = rs RA.
Proof.
intros.
destruct (Val.offset_ptr rs#base ofs) eqn:V; try discriminate.
@@ -1790,7 +1830,8 @@ Proof.
apply exec_straight_one. rewrite SEM.
unfold exec_store. rewrite B, C, H0 by eauto with asmgen. eauto.
Simpl.
- intros; Simpl.
+ split. intros; Simpl.
+ Simpl.
Qed.
Lemma make_epilogue_correct:
@@ -1807,7 +1848,7 @@ Lemma make_epilogue_correct:
/\ Mem.extends m' tm'
/\ rs'#RA = parent_ra cs
/\ rs'#SP = parent_sp cs
- /\ (forall r, r <> PC -> r <> SP -> r <> X30 -> r <> X16 -> rs'#r = rs#r).
+ /\ (forall r, r <> PC -> r <> SP -> r <> RA -> r <> X16 -> rs'#r = rs#r).
Proof.
intros until tm; intros LP LRA FREE AG MEXT MCS.
exploit Mem.loadv_extends. eauto. eexact LP. auto. simpl. intros (parent' & LP' & LDP').
@@ -1815,7 +1856,7 @@ Proof.
exploit lessdef_parent_sp; eauto. intros EQ; subst parent'; clear LDP'.
exploit lessdef_parent_ra; eauto. intros EQ; subst ra'; clear LDRA'.
exploit Mem.free_parallel_extends; eauto. intros (tm' & FREE' & MEXT').
- unfold make_epilogue.
+ unfold make_epilogue.
exploit (loadptr_correct XSP (fn_retaddr_ofs f)).
instantiate (2 := rs). simpl. rewrite <- (sp_val _ _ _ AG). simpl. eexact LRA'. simpl; congruence.
intros (rs1 & A1 & B1 & C1).
@@ -1833,4 +1874,4 @@ Proof.
intros. Simpl.
Qed.
-End CONSTRUCTORS. \ No newline at end of file
+End CONSTRUCTORS.