aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/backend/Duplicateproof.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCyril SIX <cyril.six@kalray.eu>2019-10-07 17:06:06 +0200
committerCyril SIX <cyril.six@kalray.eu>2019-10-07 17:06:06 +0200
commitcb7d444a5a97626a794f2167c2a4bc4d51f4ed67 (patch)
treeea436e9752befd8b1fba3080e0badb330fc361e2 /backend/Duplicateproof.v
parent5ffa8534d09272e5f44c51193e74cffdbc2b043c (diff)
downloadcompcert-kvx-cb7d444a5a97626a794f2167c2a4bc4d51f4ed67.tar.gz
compcert-kvx-cb7d444a5a97626a794f2167c2a4bc4d51f4ed67.zip
Finished Duplicate proof.
Diffstat (limited to 'backend/Duplicateproof.v')
-rw-r--r--backend/Duplicateproof.v75
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/backend/Duplicateproof.v b/backend/Duplicateproof.v
index ba1fecc1..54dd6196 100644
--- a/backend/Duplicateproof.v
+++ b/backend/Duplicateproof.v
@@ -51,26 +51,26 @@ Proof.
+ monadInv H0. destruct x0. eapply IHlb; assumption.
Qed.
-Inductive rtl_one_successor : node -> node -> instruction -> instruction -> Prop :=
- | inop_one_succ : forall n n', rtl_one_successor n n' (Inop n) (Inop n')
- | iop_one_succ : forall op lr r n n', rtl_one_successor n n' (Iop op lr r n) (Iop op lr r n')
- | iload_one_succ : forall m a lr r n n', rtl_one_successor n n' (Iload m a lr r n) (Iload m a lr r n')
- | istore_one_succ : forall m a lr r n n', rtl_one_successor n n' (Istore m a lr r n) (Istore m a lr r n')
- | icall_one_succ : forall s ri lr r n n', rtl_one_successor n n' (Icall s ri lr r n) (Icall s ri lr r n')
- | ibuiltin_one_succ : forall ef lbr br n n', rtl_one_successor n n' (Ibuiltin ef lbr br n) (Ibuiltin ef lbr br n')
-.
-
-Lemma verify_is_copy_correct_one:
- forall xf n n' i i',
+Lemma verify_is_copy_correct:
+ forall xf n n',
verify_is_copy (fn_revmap xf) n n' = OK tt ->
- rtl_one_successor n n' i i' ->
- match_inst (fun nn => (fn_revmap xf) ! nn) i i'.
+ (fn_revmap xf) ! n' = Some n.
Proof.
intros. unfold verify_is_copy in H. destruct (_ ! n') eqn:REVM; [|inversion H].
- destruct (n ?= p) eqn:NP; try (inversion H; fail). clear H.
+ destruct (n ?= n0) eqn:NP; try (inversion H; fail).
eapply Pos.compare_eq in NP. subst.
- inv H0.
- all: constructor; eauto.
+ reflexivity.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma verify_is_copy_list_correct:
+ forall xf ln ln',
+ verify_is_copy_list (fn_revmap xf) ln ln' = OK tt ->
+ list_forall2 (fun n n' => (fn_revmap xf) ! n' = Some n) ln ln'.
+Proof.
+ induction ln.
+ - intros. destruct ln'; monadInv H. constructor.
+ - intros. destruct ln'; monadInv H. destruct x. apply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
+ eapply IHln in EQ0. constructor; assumption.
Qed.
Lemma verify_match_inst_correct:
@@ -81,39 +81,40 @@ Proof.
intros. unfold verify_match_inst in H.
destruct i; try (inversion H; fail).
(* Inop *)
- - destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H. eapply verify_is_copy_correct_one. destruct x. eassumption.
+ - destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
constructor; eauto.
(* Iop *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
destruct (eq_operation _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (Pos.eq_dec _ _); try discriminate. clear EQ0. subst.
- eapply verify_is_copy_correct_one. destruct x. eassumption.
- constructor.
+ constructor. assumption.
(* Iload *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
destruct (chunk_eq _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (eq_addressing _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (Pos.eq_dec _ _); try discriminate. clear EQ0. subst.
- eapply verify_is_copy_correct_one. destruct x. eassumption.
- constructor.
+ constructor. assumption.
(* Istore *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
destruct (chunk_eq _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (eq_addressing _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (Pos.eq_dec _ _); try discriminate. clear EQ0. subst.
- eapply verify_is_copy_correct_one. destruct x. eassumption.
- constructor.
+ constructor. assumption.
(* Icall *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
destruct (signature_eq _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (product_eq _ _ _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate.
- destruct (Pos.eq_dec _ _); try discriminate.
- eapply verify_is_copy_correct_one. destruct x. eassumption. subst.
- constructor.
+ destruct (Pos.eq_dec _ _); try discriminate. subst.
+ constructor. assumption.
(* Itailcall *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail).
destruct (signature_eq _ _); try discriminate.
@@ -122,26 +123,30 @@ Proof.
constructor.
(* Ibuiltin *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
destruct (external_function_eq _ _); try discriminate.
destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate.
- destruct (builtin_res_eq_pos _ _); try discriminate.
- eapply verify_is_copy_correct_one. destruct x. eassumption. subst.
- constructor.
+ destruct (builtin_res_eq_pos _ _); try discriminate. subst.
+ constructor. assumption.
(* Icond *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
- unfold verify_is_copy in EQ, EQ1.
- destruct (_ ! n1) eqn:REVM; [|inversion EQ].
- destruct (n ?= p) eqn:NP; try (inversion EQ; fail). eapply Pos.compare_eq in NP. subst. inv EQ.
- destruct (_ ! n2) eqn:REVMM; [|inversion EQ1].
- destruct (n0 ?= p0) eqn:NP0; try (inversion EQ1; fail). eapply Pos.compare_eq in NP0. subst. inv EQ1.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ.
+ destruct x0. eapply verify_is_copy_correct in EQ1.
destruct (condition_eq _ _); try discriminate.
- destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate. subst. constructor; assumption.
+ destruct (list_eq_dec _ _ _); try discriminate. subst.
+ constructor; assumption.
+(* Ijumptable *)
+ - destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail). monadInv H.
+ destruct x. eapply verify_is_copy_list_correct in EQ.
+ destruct (Pos.eq_dec _ _); try discriminate. subst.
+ constructor. assumption.
(* Ireturn *)
- destruct i'; try (inversion H; fail).
destruct (option_eq _ _ _); try discriminate. subst. clear H.
constructor.
Qed.
+
Lemma verify_mapping_mn_correct:
forall mp n n' i f xf tc,
mp ! n' = Some n ->