aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/backend/Stackingproof.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCyril SIX <cyril.six@kalray.eu>2018-11-21 11:16:42 +0100
committerCyril SIX <cyril.six@kalray.eu>2018-11-21 11:16:42 +0100
commitb873e06abcee1c7f6a51aaabb973b550a52a5b61 (patch)
tree70ccd9c7cbba08e20b782217b1a2268b1afce3e9 /backend/Stackingproof.v
parent65db9a4a02c30d8dd5ca89b6fe3e4524cd4c29a5 (diff)
parenteb7bd26e2b9eeed21d204bad26fa56c8a7937ffb (diff)
downloadcompcert-kvx-b873e06abcee1c7f6a51aaabb973b550a52a5b61.tar.gz
compcert-kvx-b873e06abcee1c7f6a51aaabb973b550a52a5b61.zip
Merge tag 'v3.4' into mppa_k1c
Conflicts: .gitignore
Diffstat (limited to 'backend/Stackingproof.v')
-rw-r--r--backend/Stackingproof.v92
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/backend/Stackingproof.v b/backend/Stackingproof.v
index 6d46d04d..c9b07427 100644
--- a/backend/Stackingproof.v
+++ b/backend/Stackingproof.v
@@ -294,12 +294,13 @@ Qed.
Lemma contains_locations_exten:
forall ls ls' j sp pos bound sl,
- (forall ofs ty, ls' (S sl ofs ty) = ls (S sl ofs ty)) ->
+ (forall ofs ty, Val.lessdef (ls' (S sl ofs ty)) (ls (S sl ofs ty))) ->
massert_imp (contains_locations j sp pos bound sl ls)
(contains_locations j sp pos bound sl ls').
Proof.
intros; split; simpl; intros; auto.
- intuition auto. rewrite H. eauto.
+ intuition auto. exploit H5; eauto. intros (v & A & B). exists v; split; auto.
+ specialize (H ofs ty). inv H. congruence. auto.
Qed.
Lemma contains_locations_incr:
@@ -481,7 +482,8 @@ Qed.
Lemma frame_contents_exten:
forall ls ls0 ls' ls0' j sp parent retaddr P m,
- (forall sl ofs ty, ls' (S sl ofs ty) = ls (S sl ofs ty)) ->
+ (forall ofs ty, Val.lessdef (ls' (S Local ofs ty)) (ls (S Local ofs ty))) ->
+ (forall ofs ty, Val.lessdef (ls' (S Outgoing ofs ty)) (ls (S Outgoing ofs ty))) ->
(forall r, In r b.(used_callee_save) -> ls0' (R r) = ls0 (R r)) ->
m |= frame_contents j sp ls ls0 parent retaddr ** P ->
m |= frame_contents j sp ls' ls0' parent retaddr ** P.
@@ -573,16 +575,6 @@ Record agree_locs (ls ls0: locset) : Prop :=
ls (S Incoming ofs ty) = ls0 (S Outgoing ofs ty)
}.
-(** Auxiliary predicate used at call points *)
-
-Definition agree_callee_save (ls ls0: locset) : Prop :=
- forall l,
- match l with
- | R r => is_callee_save r = true
- | S _ _ _ => True
- end ->
- ls l = ls0 l.
-
(** ** Properties of [agree_regs]. *)
(** Values of registers *)
@@ -666,6 +658,16 @@ Proof.
apply agree_regs_set_reg; auto.
Qed.
+Lemma agree_regs_undef_caller_save_regs:
+ forall j ls rs,
+ agree_regs j ls rs ->
+ agree_regs j (LTL.undef_caller_save_regs ls) (Mach.undef_caller_save_regs rs).
+Proof.
+ intros; red; intros.
+ unfold LTL.undef_caller_save_regs, Mach.undef_caller_save_regs.
+ destruct (is_callee_save r); auto.
+Qed.
+
(** Preservation under assignment of stack slot *)
Lemma agree_regs_set_slot:
@@ -800,41 +802,7 @@ Lemma agree_locs_return:
Proof.
intros. red in H0. inv H; constructor; auto; intros.
- rewrite H0; auto. unfold mreg_within_bounds in H. tauto.
-- rewrite H0; auto.
-Qed.
-
-(** Preservation at tailcalls (when [ls0] is changed but not [ls]). *)
-
-Lemma agree_locs_tailcall:
- forall ls ls0 ls0',
- agree_locs ls ls0 ->
- agree_callee_save ls0 ls0' ->
- agree_locs ls ls0'.
-Proof.
- intros. red in H0. inv H; constructor; auto; intros.
-- rewrite <- H0; auto. unfold mreg_within_bounds in H. tauto.
-- rewrite <- H0; auto.
-Qed.
-
-(** ** Properties of [agree_callee_save]. *)
-
-Lemma agree_callee_save_return_regs:
- forall ls1 ls2,
- agree_callee_save (return_regs ls1 ls2) ls1.
-Proof.
- intros; red; intros.
- unfold return_regs. destruct l; auto. rewrite H; auto.
-Qed.
-
-Lemma agree_callee_save_set_result:
- forall sg v ls1 ls2,
- agree_callee_save ls1 ls2 ->
- agree_callee_save (Locmap.setpair (loc_result sg) v ls1) ls2.
-Proof.
- intros; red; intros. rewrite Locmap.gpo. apply H; auto.
- assert (X: forall r, is_callee_save r = false -> Loc.diff l (R r)).
- { intros. destruct l; auto. simpl; congruence. }
- generalize (loc_result_caller_save sg). destruct (loc_result sg); simpl; intuition auto.
+- rewrite <- agree_incoming0 by auto. apply H0. congruence.
Qed.
(** ** Properties of destroyed registers. *)
@@ -1071,6 +1039,7 @@ Lemma function_prologue_correct:
forall j ls ls0 ls1 rs rs1 m1 m1' m2 sp parent ra cs fb k P,
agree_regs j ls rs ->
agree_callee_save ls ls0 ->
+ agree_outgoing_arguments (Linear.fn_sig f) ls ls0 ->
(forall r, Val.has_type (ls (R r)) (mreg_type r)) ->
ls1 = LTL.undef_regs destroyed_at_function_entry (LTL.call_regs ls) ->
rs1 = undef_regs destroyed_at_function_entry rs ->
@@ -1090,7 +1059,7 @@ Lemma function_prologue_correct:
/\ j' sp = Some(sp', fe.(fe_stack_data))
/\ inject_incr j j'.
Proof.
- intros until P; intros AGREGS AGCS WTREGS LS1 RS1 ALLOC TYPAR TYRA SEP.
+ intros until P; intros AGREGS AGCS AGARGS WTREGS LS1 RS1 ALLOC TYPAR TYRA SEP.
rewrite unfold_transf_function.
unfold fn_stacksize, fn_link_ofs, fn_retaddr_ofs.
(* Stack layout info *)
@@ -1174,7 +1143,7 @@ Local Opaque b fe.
split. rewrite LS1. apply agree_locs_undef_locs; [|reflexivity].
constructor; intros. unfold call_regs. apply AGCS.
unfold mreg_within_bounds in H; tauto.
- unfold call_regs. apply AGCS. auto.
+ unfold call_regs. apply AGARGS. apply incoming_slot_in_parameters; auto.
split. exact SEPFINAL.
split. exact SAME. exact INCR.
Qed.
@@ -1325,7 +1294,7 @@ Proof.
apply CS; auto.
rewrite NCS by auto. apply AGR.
split. red; unfold return_regs; intros.
- destruct l; auto. rewrite H; auto.
+ destruct l. rewrite H; auto. destruct sl; auto; contradiction.
assumption.
Qed.
@@ -1619,6 +1588,7 @@ Variable ls: locset.
Variable rs: regset.
Hypothesis AGR: agree_regs j ls rs.
Hypothesis AGCS: agree_callee_save ls (parent_locset cs).
+Hypothesis AGARGS: agree_outgoing_arguments sg ls (parent_locset cs).
Variable m': mem.
Hypothesis SEP: m' |= stack_contents j cs cs'.
@@ -1641,7 +1611,7 @@ Proof.
assert (slot_within_bounds (function_bounds f) Outgoing pos ty) by eauto.
exploit frame_get_outgoing; eauto. intros (v & A & B).
exists v; split.
- constructor. exact A. red in AGCS. rewrite AGCS; auto.
+ constructor. exact A. rewrite AGARGS by auto. exact B.
Qed.
Lemma transl_external_argument_2:
@@ -1816,7 +1786,6 @@ Inductive match_states: Linear.state -> Mach.state -> Prop :=
(TRANSL: transf_fundef f = OK tf)
(FIND: Genv.find_funct_ptr tge fb = Some tf)
(AGREGS: agree_regs j ls rs)
- (AGLOCS: agree_callee_save ls (parent_locset cs))
(SEP: m' |= stack_contents j cs cs'
** minjection j m
** globalenv_inject ge j),
@@ -1826,7 +1795,6 @@ Inductive match_states: Linear.state -> Mach.state -> Prop :=
forall cs ls m cs' rs m' j sg
(STACKS: match_stacks j cs cs' sg)
(AGREGS: agree_regs j ls rs)
- (AGLOCS: agree_callee_save ls (parent_locset cs))
(SEP: m' |= stack_contents j cs cs'
** minjection j m
** globalenv_inject ge j),
@@ -1989,9 +1957,8 @@ Proof.
econstructor; eauto with coqlib.
apply Val.Vptr_has_type.
intros; red.
- apply Z.le_trans with (size_arguments (Linear.funsig f')); auto.
+ apply Z.le_trans with (size_arguments (Linear.funsig f')); auto.
apply loc_arguments_bounded; auto.
- simpl; red; auto.
simpl. rewrite sep_assoc. exact SEP.
- (* Ltailcall *)
@@ -2091,6 +2058,7 @@ Proof.
destruct (transf_function f) as [tfn|] eqn:TRANSL; simpl; try congruence.
intros EQ; inversion EQ; clear EQ; subst tf.
rewrite sep_comm, sep_assoc in SEP.
+ exploit wt_callstate_agree; eauto. intros [AGCS AGARGS].
exploit function_prologue_correct; eauto.
red; intros; eapply wt_callstate_wt_regs; eauto.
eapply match_stacks_type_sp; eauto.
@@ -2109,6 +2077,7 @@ Proof.
- (* external function *)
simpl in TRANSL. inversion TRANSL; subst tf.
+ exploit wt_callstate_agree; eauto. intros [AGCS AGARGS].
exploit transl_external_arguments; eauto. apply sep_proj1 in SEP; eauto. intros [vl [ARGS VINJ]].
rewrite sep_comm, sep_assoc in SEP.
exploit external_call_parallel_rule; eauto.
@@ -2118,18 +2087,22 @@ Proof.
eapply external_call_symbols_preserved; eauto. apply senv_preserved.
eapply match_states_return with (j := j').
eapply match_stacks_change_meminj; eauto.
- apply agree_regs_set_pair. apply agree_regs_inject_incr with j; auto. auto.
- apply agree_callee_save_set_result; auto.
+ apply agree_regs_set_pair. apply agree_regs_undef_caller_save_regs.
+ apply agree_regs_inject_incr with j; auto.
+ auto.
apply stack_contents_change_meminj with j; auto.
rewrite sep_comm, sep_assoc; auto.
- (* return *)
- inv STACKS. simpl in AGLOCS. simpl in SEP. rewrite sep_assoc in SEP.
+ inv STACKS. exploit wt_returnstate_agree; eauto. intros [AGCS OUTU].
+ simpl in AGCS. simpl in SEP. rewrite sep_assoc in SEP.
econstructor; split.
apply plus_one. apply exec_return.
econstructor; eauto.
apply agree_locs_return with rs0; auto.
apply frame_contents_exten with rs0 (parent_locset s); auto.
+ intros; apply Val.lessdef_same; apply AGCS; red; congruence.
+ intros; rewrite (OUTU ty ofs); auto.
Qed.
Lemma transf_initial_states:
@@ -2147,7 +2120,6 @@ Proof.
eapply match_states_call with (j := j); eauto.
constructor. red; intros. rewrite H3, loc_arguments_main in H. contradiction.
red; simpl; auto.
- red; simpl; auto.
simpl. rewrite sep_pure. split; auto. split;[|split].
eapply Genv.initmem_inject; eauto.
simpl. exists (Mem.nextblock m0); split. apply Ple_refl.