aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/Coqlib.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorxleroy <xleroy@fca1b0fc-160b-0410-b1d3-a4f43f01ea2e>2009-06-05 13:39:59 +0000
committerxleroy <xleroy@fca1b0fc-160b-0410-b1d3-a4f43f01ea2e>2009-06-05 13:39:59 +0000
commit615fb53c13f2407a0b6b470bbdf8e468fc4a1d78 (patch)
treeec5f45b6546e19519f59b1ee0f42955616ca1b98 /lib/Coqlib.v
parentd1cdc0496d7d52e3ab91554dbf53fcc0e7f244eb (diff)
downloadcompcert-kvx-615fb53c13f2407a0b6b470bbdf8e468fc4a1d78.tar.gz
compcert-kvx-615fb53c13f2407a0b6b470bbdf8e468fc4a1d78.zip
Adapted to work with Coq 8.2-1v1.4.1
git-svn-id: https://yquem.inria.fr/compcert/svn/compcert/trunk@1076 fca1b0fc-160b-0410-b1d3-a4f43f01ea2e
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Coqlib.v')
-rw-r--r--lib/Coqlib.v120
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Coqlib.v b/lib/Coqlib.v
index a79ea29c..9e2199c1 100644
--- a/lib/Coqlib.v
+++ b/lib/Coqlib.v
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Require Import Wf_nat.
that have identical contents are equal. *)
Axiom extensionality:
- forall (A B: Set) (f g : A -> B),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f g : A -> B),
(forall x, f x = g x) -> f = g.
Axiom proof_irrelevance:
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma peq_true:
- forall (A: Set) (x: positive) (a b: A), (if peq x x then a else b) = a.
+ forall (A: Type) (x: positive) (a b: A), (if peq x x then a else b) = a.
Proof.
intros. case (peq x x); intros.
auto.
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma peq_false:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: positive) (a b: A), x <> y -> (if peq x y then a else b) = b.
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: positive) (a b: A), x <> y -> (if peq x y then a else b) = b.
Proof.
intros. case (peq x y); intros.
elim H; auto.
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ Proof.
intros. apply nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_morphism. exact H.
Qed.
-Variable A: Set.
+Variable A: Type.
Variable v1: A.
Variable f: positive -> A -> A.
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ End POSITIVE_ITERATION.
Definition zeq: forall (x y: Z), {x = y} + {x <> y} := Z_eq_dec.
Lemma zeq_true:
- forall (A: Set) (x: Z) (a b: A), (if zeq x x then a else b) = a.
+ forall (A: Type) (x: Z) (a b: A), (if zeq x x then a else b) = a.
Proof.
intros. case (zeq x x); intros.
auto.
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma zeq_false:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: Z) (a b: A), x <> y -> (if zeq x y then a else b) = b.
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: Z) (a b: A), x <> y -> (if zeq x y then a else b) = b.
Proof.
intros. case (zeq x y); intros.
elim H; auto.
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ Open Scope Z_scope.
Definition zlt: forall (x y: Z), {x < y} + {x >= y} := Z_lt_ge_dec.
Lemma zlt_true:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
x < y -> (if zlt x y then a else b) = a.
Proof.
intros. case (zlt x y); intros.
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma zlt_false:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
x >= y -> (if zlt x y then a else b) = b.
Proof.
intros. case (zlt x y); intros.
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ Qed.
Definition zle: forall (x y: Z), {x <= y} + {x > y} := Z_le_gt_dec.
Lemma zle_true:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
x <= y -> (if zle x y then a else b) = a.
Proof.
intros. case (zle x y); intros.
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma zle_false:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: Z) (a b: A),
x > y -> (if zle x y then a else b) = b.
Proof.
intros. case (zle x y); intros.
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ Set Implicit Arguments.
(** Mapping a function over an option type. *)
-Definition option_map (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (x: option A) : option B :=
+Definition option_map (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (x: option A) : option B :=
match x with
| None => None
| Some y => Some (f y)
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ Definition option_map (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (x: option A) : option B :=
(** Mapping a function over a sum type. *)
-Definition sum_left_map (A B C: Set) (f: A -> B) (x: A + C) : B + C :=
+Definition sum_left_map (A B C: Type) (f: A -> B) (x: A + C) : B + C :=
match x with
| inl y => inl C (f y)
| inr z => inr B z
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ Definition sum_left_map (A B C: Set) (f: A -> B) (x: A + C) : B + C :=
Hint Resolve in_eq in_cons: coqlib.
Lemma nth_error_in:
- forall (A: Set) (n: nat) (l: list A) (x: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (n: nat) (l: list A) (x: A),
List.nth_error l n = Some x -> In x l.
Proof.
induction n; simpl.
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ Qed.
Hint Resolve nth_error_in: coqlib.
Lemma nth_error_nil:
- forall (A: Set) (idx: nat), nth_error (@nil A) idx = None.
+ forall (A: Type) (idx: nat), nth_error (@nil A) idx = None.
Proof.
induction idx; simpl; intros; reflexivity.
Qed.
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ Hint Resolve nth_error_nil: coqlib.
(** Properties of [List.incl] (list inclusion). *)
Lemma incl_cons_inv:
- forall (A: Set) (a: A) (b c: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (a: A) (b c: list A),
incl (a :: b) c -> incl b c.
Proof.
unfold incl; intros. apply H. apply in_cons. auto.
@@ -623,14 +623,14 @@ Qed.
Hint Resolve incl_cons_inv: coqlib.
Lemma incl_app_inv_l:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2 m: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2 m: list A),
incl (l1 ++ l2) m -> incl l1 m.
Proof.
unfold incl; intros. apply H. apply in_or_app. left; assumption.
Qed.
Lemma incl_app_inv_r:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2 m: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2 m: list A),
incl (l1 ++ l2) m -> incl l2 m.
Proof.
unfold incl; intros. apply H. apply in_or_app. right; assumption.
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ Qed.
Hint Resolve incl_tl incl_refl incl_app_inv_l incl_app_inv_r: coqlib.
Lemma incl_same_head:
- forall (A: Set) (x: A) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (x: A) (l1 l2: list A),
incl l1 l2 -> incl (x::l1) (x::l2).
Proof.
intros; red; simpl; intros. intuition.
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ Qed.
(** Properties of [List.map] (mapping a function over a list). *)
Lemma list_map_exten:
- forall (A B: Set) (f f': A -> B) (l: list A),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f f': A -> B) (l: list A),
(forall x, In x l -> f x = f' x) ->
List.map f' l = List.map f l.
Proof.
@@ -660,21 +660,21 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_map_compose:
- forall (A B C: Set) (f: A -> B) (g: B -> C) (l: list A),
+ forall (A B C: Type) (f: A -> B) (g: B -> C) (l: list A),
List.map g (List.map f l) = List.map (fun x => g(f x)) l.
Proof.
induction l; simpl. reflexivity. rewrite IHl; reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma list_map_identity:
- forall (A: Set) (l: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l: list A),
List.map (fun (x:A) => x) l = l.
Proof.
induction l; simpl; congruence.
Qed.
Lemma list_map_nth:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l: list A) (n: nat),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l: list A) (n: nat),
nth_error (List.map f l) n = option_map f (nth_error l n).
Proof.
induction l; simpl; intros.
@@ -683,14 +683,14 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_length_map:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l: list A),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l: list A),
List.length (List.map f l) = List.length l.
Proof.
induction l; simpl; congruence.
Qed.
Lemma list_in_map_inv:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l: list A) (y: B),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l: list A) (y: B),
In y (List.map f l) -> exists x:A, y = f x /\ In x l.
Proof.
induction l; simpl; intros.
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_append_map:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l1 l2: list A),
List.map f (l1 ++ l2) = List.map f l1 ++ List.map f l2.
Proof.
induction l1; simpl; intros.
@@ -712,19 +712,19 @@ Qed.
(** Properties of list membership. *)
Lemma in_cns:
- forall (A: Set) (x y: A) (l: list A), In x (y :: l) <-> y = x \/ In x l.
+ forall (A: Type) (x y: A) (l: list A), In x (y :: l) <-> y = x \/ In x l.
Proof.
intros. simpl. tauto.
Qed.
Lemma in_app:
- forall (A: Set) (x: A) (l1 l2: list A), In x (l1 ++ l2) <-> In x l1 \/ In x l2.
+ forall (A: Type) (x: A) (l1 l2: list A), In x (l1 ++ l2) <-> In x l1 \/ In x l2.
Proof.
intros. split; intro. apply in_app_or. auto. apply in_or_app. auto.
Qed.
Lemma list_in_insert:
- forall (A: Set) (x: A) (l1 l2: list A) (y: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (x: A) (l1 l2: list A) (y: A),
In x (l1 ++ l2) -> In x (l1 ++ y :: l2).
Proof.
intros. apply in_or_app; simpl. elim (in_app_or _ _ _ H); intro; auto.
@@ -733,25 +733,25 @@ Qed.
(** [list_disjoint l1 l2] holds iff [l1] and [l2] have no elements
in common. *)
-Definition list_disjoint (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A) : Prop :=
+Definition list_disjoint (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A) : Prop :=
forall (x y: A), In x l1 -> In y l2 -> x <> y.
Lemma list_disjoint_cons_left:
- forall (A: Set) (a: A) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (a: A) (l1 l2: list A),
list_disjoint (a :: l1) l2 -> list_disjoint l1 l2.
Proof.
unfold list_disjoint; simpl; intros. apply H; tauto.
Qed.
Lemma list_disjoint_cons_right:
- forall (A: Set) (a: A) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (a: A) (l1 l2: list A),
list_disjoint l1 (a :: l2) -> list_disjoint l1 l2.
Proof.
unfold list_disjoint; simpl; intros. apply H; tauto.
Qed.
Lemma list_disjoint_notin:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A) (a: A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A) (a: A),
list_disjoint l1 l2 -> In a l1 -> ~(In a l2).
Proof.
unfold list_disjoint; intros; red; intros.
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_disjoint_sym:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A),
list_disjoint l1 l2 -> list_disjoint l2 l1.
Proof.
unfold list_disjoint; intros.
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_disjoint_dec:
- forall (A: Set) (eqA_dec: forall (x y: A), {x=y} + {x<>y}) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (eqA_dec: forall (x y: A), {x=y} + {x<>y}) (l1 l2: list A),
{list_disjoint l1 l2} + {~list_disjoint l1 l2}.
Proof.
induction l1; intros.
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ Defined.
(** [list_norepet l] holds iff the list [l] contains no repetitions,
i.e. no element occurs twice. *)
-Inductive list_norepet (A: Set) : list A -> Prop :=
+Inductive list_norepet (A: Type) : list A -> Prop :=
| list_norepet_nil:
list_norepet nil
| list_norepet_cons:
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ Inductive list_norepet (A: Set) : list A -> Prop :=
~(In hd tl) -> list_norepet tl -> list_norepet (hd :: tl).
Lemma list_norepet_dec:
- forall (A: Set) (eqA_dec: forall (x y: A), {x=y} + {x<>y}) (l: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (eqA_dec: forall (x y: A), {x=y} + {x<>y}) (l: list A),
{list_norepet l} + {~list_norepet l}.
Proof.
induction l.
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ Proof.
Defined.
Lemma list_map_norepet:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l: list A),
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l: list A),
list_norepet l ->
(forall x y, In x l -> In y l -> x <> y -> f x <> f y) ->
list_norepet (List.map f l).
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Remark list_norepet_append_commut:
- forall (A: Set) (a b: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (a b: list A),
list_norepet (a ++ b) -> list_norepet (b ++ a).
Proof.
intro A.
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_norepet_app:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A),
list_norepet (l1 ++ l2) <->
list_norepet l1 /\ list_norepet l2 /\ list_disjoint l1 l2.
Proof.
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_norepet_append:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A),
list_norepet l1 -> list_norepet l2 -> list_disjoint l1 l2 ->
list_norepet (l1 ++ l2).
Proof.
@@ -868,14 +868,14 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma list_norepet_append_right:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A),
list_norepet (l1 ++ l2) -> list_norepet l2.
Proof.
generalize list_norepet_app; firstorder.
Qed.
Lemma list_norepet_append_left:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A),
list_norepet (l1 ++ l2) -> list_norepet l1.
Proof.
generalize list_norepet_app; firstorder.
@@ -883,14 +883,14 @@ Qed.
(** [is_tail l1 l2] holds iff [l2] is of the form [l ++ l1] for some [l]. *)
-Inductive is_tail (A: Set): list A -> list A -> Prop :=
+Inductive is_tail (A: Type): list A -> list A -> Prop :=
| is_tail_refl:
forall c, is_tail c c
| is_tail_cons:
forall i c1 c2, is_tail c1 c2 -> is_tail c1 (i :: c2).
Lemma is_tail_in:
- forall (A: Set) (i: A) c1 c2, is_tail (i :: c1) c2 -> In i c2.
+ forall (A: Type) (i: A) c1 c2, is_tail (i :: c1) c2 -> In i c2.
Proof.
induction c2; simpl; intros.
inversion H.
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Lemma is_tail_cons_left:
- forall (A: Set) (i: A) c1 c2, is_tail (i :: c1) c2 -> is_tail c1 c2.
+ forall (A: Type) (i: A) c1 c2, is_tail (i :: c1) c2 -> is_tail c1 c2.
Proof.
induction c2; intros; inversion H.
constructor. constructor. constructor. auto.
@@ -907,13 +907,13 @@ Qed.
Hint Resolve is_tail_refl is_tail_cons is_tail_in is_tail_cons_left: coqlib.
Lemma is_tail_incl:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A), is_tail l1 l2 -> incl l1 l2.
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A), is_tail l1 l2 -> incl l1 l2.
Proof.
induction 1; eauto with coqlib.
Qed.
Lemma is_tail_trans:
- forall (A: Set) (l1 l2: list A),
+ forall (A: Type) (l1 l2: list A),
is_tail l1 l2 -> forall (l3: list A), is_tail l2 l3 -> is_tail l1 l3.
Proof.
induction 1; intros. auto. apply IHis_tail. eapply is_tail_cons_left; eauto.
@@ -924,8 +924,8 @@ Qed.
Section FORALL2.
-Variable A: Set.
-Variable B: Set.
+Variable A: Type.
+Variable B: Type.
Variable P: A -> B -> Prop.
Inductive list_forall2: list A -> list B -> Prop :=
@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ Inductive list_forall2: list A -> list B -> Prop :=
End FORALL2.
Lemma list_forall2_imply:
- forall (A B: Set) (P1: A -> B -> Prop) (l1: list A) (l2: list B),
+ forall (A B: Type) (P1: A -> B -> Prop) (l1: list A) (l2: list B),
list_forall2 P1 l1 l2 ->
forall (P2: A -> B -> Prop),
(forall v1 v2, In v1 l1 -> In v2 l2 -> P1 v1 v2 -> P2 v1 v2) ->
@@ -954,45 +954,45 @@ Qed.
(** Dropping the first or first two elements of a list. *)
-Definition list_drop1 (A: Set) (x: list A) :=
+Definition list_drop1 (A: Type) (x: list A) :=
match x with nil => nil | hd :: tl => tl end.
-Definition list_drop2 (A: Set) (x: list A) :=
+Definition list_drop2 (A: Type) (x: list A) :=
match x with nil => nil | hd :: nil => nil | hd1 :: hd2 :: tl => tl end.
Lemma list_drop1_incl:
- forall (A: Set) (x: A) (l: list A), In x (list_drop1 l) -> In x l.
+ forall (A: Type) (x: A) (l: list A), In x (list_drop1 l) -> In x l.
Proof.
intros. destruct l. elim H. simpl in H. auto with coqlib.
Qed.
Lemma list_drop2_incl:
- forall (A: Set) (x: A) (l: list A), In x (list_drop2 l) -> In x l.
+ forall (A: Type) (x: A) (l: list A), In x (list_drop2 l) -> In x l.
Proof.
intros. destruct l. elim H. destruct l. elim H.
simpl in H. auto with coqlib.
Qed.
Lemma list_drop1_norepet:
- forall (A: Set) (l: list A), list_norepet l -> list_norepet (list_drop1 l).
+ forall (A: Type) (l: list A), list_norepet l -> list_norepet (list_drop1 l).
Proof.
intros. destruct l; simpl. constructor. inversion H. auto.
Qed.
Lemma list_drop2_norepet:
- forall (A: Set) (l: list A), list_norepet l -> list_norepet (list_drop2 l).
+ forall (A: Type) (l: list A), list_norepet l -> list_norepet (list_drop2 l).
Proof.
intros. destruct l; simpl. constructor.
destruct l; simpl. constructor. inversion H. inversion H3. auto.
Qed.
Lemma list_map_drop1:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l: list A), list_drop1 (map f l) = map f (list_drop1 l).
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l: list A), list_drop1 (map f l) = map f (list_drop1 l).
Proof.
intros; destruct l; reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma list_map_drop2:
- forall (A B: Set) (f: A -> B) (l: list A), list_drop2 (map f l) = map f (list_drop2 l).
+ forall (A B: Type) (f: A -> B) (l: list A), list_drop2 (map f l) = map f (list_drop2 l).
Proof.
intros; destruct l. reflexivity. destruct l; reflexivity.
Qed.
@@ -1014,9 +1014,9 @@ Qed.
Section DECIDABLE_EQUALITY.
-Variable A: Set.
+Variable A: Type.
Variable dec_eq: forall (x y: A), {x=y} + {x<>y}.
-Variable B: Set.
+Variable B: Type.
Lemma dec_eq_true:
forall (x: A) (ifso ifnot: B),