diff options
author | Sylvain Boulmé <sylvain.boulme@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> | 2021-05-28 16:33:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sylvain Boulmé <sylvain.boulme@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> | 2021-05-28 16:33:23 +0200 |
commit | 2311cb788e6dcf0103266fd6c6aa76096c283e34 (patch) | |
tree | 83d7cab703605fb293459fd5287244722517fbe6 /scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v | |
parent | 5b67f8284c3a98581f4da9b065a738fc534480c4 (diff) | |
download | compcert-kvx-2311cb788e6dcf0103266fd6c6aa76096c283e34.tar.gz compcert-kvx-2311cb788e6dcf0103266fd6c6aa76096c283e34.zip |
remove dupmap from BTL_Scheduler !
Diffstat (limited to 'scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v')
-rw-r--r-- | scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v | 24 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v b/scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v index ea7082a9..3083ca71 100644 --- a/scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v +++ b/scheduling/BTL_SEtheory.v @@ -1020,10 +1020,7 @@ Proof. inversion SEXEC. Qed. -(** * High-Level specification of the symbolic simulation test as predicate [symbolic_simu] - -TODO: à revoir complètement. Il faut passer le dupmap en paramètre et match les états symboliques modulo le dupmap. -*) +(** * High-Level specification of the symbolic simulation test as predicate [symbolic_simu] *) Record simu_proof_context := Sctx { sge1: BTL.genv; @@ -1031,7 +1028,7 @@ Record simu_proof_context := Sctx { sge_match: forall s, Genv.find_symbol sge1 s = Genv.find_symbol sge2 s; sstk1: list BTL.stackframe; sstk2: list BTL.stackframe; - sstk_equiv: list_forall2 equiv_stackframe sstk1 sstk2; (* REM: equiv_stackframe n'est pas suffisant, il faut le dupmap dedans ! *) + sstk_equiv: list_forall2 equiv_stackframe sstk1 sstk2; ssp: val; srs0: regset; sm0: mem @@ -1040,24 +1037,23 @@ Record simu_proof_context := Sctx { Definition bctx1 f1 (ctx: simu_proof_context):= Bctx ctx.(sge1) ctx.(sstk1) f1 ctx.(ssp) ctx.(srs0) ctx.(sm0). Definition bctx2 f2 (ctx: simu_proof_context):= Bctx ctx.(sge2) ctx.(sstk2) f2 ctx.(ssp) ctx.(srs0) ctx.(sm0). -(* TODO: A REVOIR ! *) Definition sstate_simu f1 f2 (ctx: simu_proof_context) (st1 st2: sstate) := forall t s1, sem_sstate (bctx1 f1 ctx) t s1 st1 -> exists s2, sem_sstate (bctx2 f2 ctx) t s2 st2 /\ equiv_state s1 s2. -Definition symbolic_simu f1 f2 ctx ib1 ib2: sstate_simu f1 f2 ctx (sexec (f1 ctx) ib1) (sexec (f2 ctx) ib2). +Definition symbolic_simu f1 f2 ib1 ib2: Prop := forall ctx, sstate_simu f1 f2 ctx (sexec f1 ib1) (sexec f2 ib2). -Theorem symbolic_simu_correct f1 f2 ctx ib1 ib2: - symbolic_simu ctx ib1 ib2 -> - forall t s1, iblock_step tr_inputs (sge1 ctx) (sstk1 ctx) (sf1 ctx) (ssp ctx) (srs0 ctx) (sm0 ctx) ib1 t s1 -> - exists s2, iblock_step tr_inputs (sge2 ctx) (sstk2 ctx) (sf2 ctx) (ssp ctx) (srs0 ctx) (sm0 ctx) ib2 t s2 /\ equiv_state s1 s2. +Theorem symbolic_simu_correct f1 f2 ib1 ib2: + symbolic_simu f1 f2 ib1 ib2 -> + forall ctx t s1, iblock_step tr_inputs (sge1 ctx) (sstk1 ctx) f1 (ssp ctx) (srs0 ctx) (sm0 ctx) ib1 t s1 -> + exists s2, iblock_step tr_inputs (sge2 ctx) (sstk2 ctx) f2 (ssp ctx) (srs0 ctx) (sm0 ctx) ib2 t s2 /\ equiv_state s1 s2. Proof. unfold symbolic_simu, sstate_simu. - intros SIMU t s1 STEP1. - exploit (sexec_correct (bctx1 ctx)); simpl; eauto. + intros SIMU ctx t s1 STEP1. + exploit (sexec_correct (bctx1 f1 ctx)); simpl; eauto. intros; exploit SIMU; eauto. intros (s2 & SEM1 & EQ1). - exploit (sexec_exact (bctx2 ctx)); simpl; eauto. + exploit (sexec_exact (bctx2 f2 ctx)); simpl; eauto. intros (s3 & STEP2 & EQ2). clear STEP1; eexists; split; eauto. eapply equiv_state_trans; eauto. |