aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scheduling
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLéo Gourdin <leo.gourdin@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>2021-02-08 15:25:13 +0100
committerLéo Gourdin <leo.gourdin@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>2021-02-08 15:25:13 +0100
commit0d41f5a2c9b7f1f01e142211edcc498b40c7506f (patch)
tree06f97a4b94af4cd87917fb1d2295acdcd841f2dc /scheduling
parent8a57683e35e761389e0ca976d79f2a5a4c387733 (diff)
downloadcompcert-kvx-0d41f5a2c9b7f1f01e142211edcc498b40c7506f.tar.gz
compcert-kvx-0d41f5a2c9b7f1f01e142211edcc498b40c7506f.zip
Checker for wellformed path
Diffstat (limited to 'scheduling')
-rw-r--r--scheduling/RTLpathWFcheck.v177
1 files changed, 175 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/scheduling/RTLpathWFcheck.v b/scheduling/RTLpathWFcheck.v
index eca5b24e..f5198e68 100644
--- a/scheduling/RTLpathWFcheck.v
+++ b/scheduling/RTLpathWFcheck.v
@@ -13,12 +13,185 @@ Local Open Scope lazy_bool_scope.
Local Open Scope option_monad_scope.
+Definition exit_checker {A} (pm: path_map) (pc: node) (v:A): option A :=
+ SOME path <- pm!pc IN
+ Some v.
+
+Lemma exit_checker_path_entry A (pm: path_map) (pc: node) (v:A) res:
+ exit_checker pm pc v = Some res -> path_entry pm pc.
+Proof.
+ unfold exit_checker, path_entry.
+ inversion_SOME path; simpl; congruence.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma exit_checker_res A (pm: path_map) (pc: node) (v:A) res:
+ exit_checker pm pc v = Some res -> v=res.
+Proof.
+ unfold exit_checker, path_entry.
+ inversion_SOME path; try_simplify_someHyps.
+Qed.
+
+(* FIXME - what about trap? *)
+Definition iinst_checker (pm: path_map) (i: instruction): option (node) :=
+ match i with
+ | Inop pc' | Iop _ _ _ pc' | Iload _ _ _ _ _ pc'
+ | Istore _ _ _ _ pc' => Some (pc')
+ | Icond cond args ifso ifnot _ =>
+ exit_checker pm ifso ifnot
+ | _ => None (* TODO jumptable ? *)
+ end.
+
+Local Hint Resolve exit_checker_path_entry: core.
+
+Lemma iinst_checker_path_entry (pm: path_map) (i: instruction) res pc:
+ iinst_checker pm i = Some res ->
+ early_exit i = Some pc -> path_entry pm pc.
+Proof.
+ destruct i; simpl; try_simplify_someHyps; subst.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma iinst_checker_default_succ (pm: path_map) (i: instruction) res pc:
+ iinst_checker pm i = Some res ->
+ pc = res ->
+ default_succ i = Some pc.
+Proof.
+ destruct i; simpl; try_simplify_someHyps; subst;
+ repeat (inversion_ASSERT); try_simplify_someHyps.
+ intros; exploit exit_checker_res; eauto.
+ intros; subst. simpl; auto.
+Qed.
+
+Fixpoint ipath_checker (ps:nat) (f: RTL.function) (pm: path_map) (pc:node): option (node) :=
+ match ps with
+ | O => Some (pc)
+ | S p =>
+ SOME i <- f.(fn_code)!pc IN
+ SOME res <- iinst_checker pm i IN
+ ipath_checker p f pm res
+ end.
+
+Lemma ipath_checker_wellformed f pm ps: forall pc res,
+ ipath_checker ps f pm pc = Some res ->
+ wellformed_path f.(fn_code) pm 0 res ->
+ wellformed_path f.(fn_code) pm ps pc.
+Proof.
+ induction ps; simpl; try_simplify_someHyps.
+ inversion_SOME i; inversion_SOME res'.
+ intros. eapply wf_internal_node; eauto.
+ * eapply iinst_checker_default_succ; eauto.
+ * intros; eapply iinst_checker_path_entry; eauto.
+Qed.
+
+Fixpoint exit_list_checker (pm: path_map) (l: list node): bool :=
+ match l with
+ | nil => true
+ | pc::l' => exit_checker pm pc tt &&& exit_list_checker pm l'
+ end.
+
+Lemma lazy_and_Some_true A (o: option A) (b: bool): o &&& b = true <-> (exists v, o = Some v) /\ b = true.
+Proof.
+ destruct o; simpl; intuition.
+ - eauto.
+ - firstorder. try_simplify_someHyps.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma lazy_and_Some_tt_true (o: option unit) (b: bool): o &&& b = true <-> o = Some tt /\ b = true.
+Proof.
+ intros; rewrite lazy_and_Some_true; firstorder.
+ destruct x; auto.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma exit_list_checker_correct pm l pc:
+ exit_list_checker pm l = true -> List.In pc l -> exit_checker pm pc tt = Some tt.
+Proof.
+ intros EXIT PC; induction l; intuition.
+ simpl in * |-. rewrite lazy_and_Some_tt_true in EXIT.
+ firstorder (subst; eauto).
+Qed.
+
+Local Hint Resolve exit_list_checker_correct: core.
+
+Definition inst_checker (pm: path_map) (i: instruction): option unit :=
+ match i with
+ | Icall sig ros args res pc' =>
+ exit_checker pm pc' tt
+ | Itailcall sig ros args =>
+ Some tt
+ | Ibuiltin ef args res pc' =>
+ exit_checker pm pc' tt
+ | Ijumptable arg tbl =>
+ ASSERT exit_list_checker pm tbl IN
+ Some tt
+ | Ireturn optarg =>
+ Some tt
+ | _ =>
+ SOME res <- iinst_checker pm i IN
+ exit_checker pm res tt
+ end.
+
+Lemma inst_checker_wellformed (c:code) pc (pm: path_map) (i: instruction):
+ inst_checker pm i = Some tt ->
+ c!pc = Some i -> wellformed_path c pm 0 pc.
+Proof.
+ intros CHECK PC. eapply wf_last_node; eauto.
+ clear c pc PC. intros pc PC.
+ destruct i; simpl in * |- *; intuition (subst; eauto);
+ try (generalize CHECK; clear CHECK; try (inversion_SOME path); repeat inversion_ASSERT; try_simplify_someHyps).
+ intros X; exploit exit_checker_res; eauto.
+ clear X. intros; subst; eauto.
+Qed.
+
+Definition path_checker (f: RTL.function) pm (pc: node) (path:path_info): option unit :=
+ SOME res <- ipath_checker (path.(psize)) f pm pc IN
+ SOME i <- f.(fn_code)!res IN
+ inst_checker pm i.
+
+Lemma path_checker_wellformed f pm pc path:
+ path_checker f pm pc path = Some tt -> wellformed_path (f.(fn_code)) pm (path.(psize)) pc.
+Proof.
+ unfold path_checker.
+ inversion_SOME res.
+ inversion_SOME i.
+ intros; eapply ipath_checker_wellformed; eauto.
+ eapply inst_checker_wellformed; eauto.
+Qed.
+
+Fixpoint list_path_checker f pm (l:list (node*path_info)): bool :=
+ match l with
+ | nil => true
+ | (pc, path)::l' =>
+ path_checker f pm pc path &&& list_path_checker f pm l'
+ end.
+
+Lemma list_path_checker_correct f pm l:
+ list_path_checker f pm l = true -> forall e, List.In e l -> path_checker f pm (fst e) (snd e) = Some tt.
+Proof.
+ intros CHECKER e H; induction l as [|(pc & path) l]; intuition.
+ simpl in * |- *. rewrite lazy_and_Some_tt_true in CHECKER. intuition (subst; auto).
+Qed.
+
Definition function_checker (f: RTL.function) (pm: path_map): bool :=
- pm!(f.(fn_entrypoint)) &&& true. (* TODO: &&& list_path_checker f pm (PTree.elements pm) *)
+ pm!(f.(fn_entrypoint)) &&& list_path_checker f pm (PTree.elements pm).
+
+Lemma function_checker_correct f pm pc path:
+ function_checker f pm = true ->
+ pm!pc = Some path ->
+ path_checker f pm pc path = Some tt.
+Proof.
+ unfold function_checker; rewrite lazy_and_Some_true.
+ intros (ENTRY & PATH) PC.
+ exploit list_path_checker_correct; eauto.
+ - eapply PTree.elements_correct; eauto.
+ - simpl; auto.
+Qed.
Lemma function_checker_wellformed_path_map f pm:
function_checker f pm = true -> wellformed_path_map f.(fn_code) pm.
-Admitted.
+Proof.
+ unfold wellformed_path_map.
+ intros; eapply path_checker_wellformed; eauto.
+ intros; eapply function_checker_correct; eauto.
+Qed.
Lemma function_checker_path_entry f pm:
function_checker f pm = true -> path_entry pm (f.(fn_entrypoint)).