aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v')
-rw-r--r--mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v34
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v b/mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v
index a807279b..8e2c22cd 100644
--- a/mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v
+++ b/mppa_k1c/lib/RTLpathLiveproofs.v
@@ -98,10 +98,10 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Record eqlive_istate alive (st1 st2: istate): Prop :=
- { eqlive_continue: continue st1 = continue st2;
- eqlive_the_pc: the_pc st1 = the_pc st2;
- eqlive_the_rs: eqlive_reg alive (the_rs st1) (the_rs st2);
- eqlive_the_mem: (the_mem st1) = (the_mem st2) }.
+ { eqlive_continue: icontinue st1 = icontinue st2;
+ eqlive_ipc: ipc st1 = ipc st2;
+ eqlive_irs: eqlive_reg alive (irs st1) (irs st2);
+ eqlive_imem: (imem st1) = (imem st2) }.
Lemma iinst_checker_eqlive ge sp pm alive i res rs1 rs2 m st1:
eqlive_reg (ext alive) rs1 rs2 ->
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ Qed.
Lemma iinst_checker_istep_continue ge sp pm alive i res rs m st:
iinst_checker pm alive i = Some res ->
istep ge i sp rs m = Some st ->
- continue st = true ->
- (snd res)=(the_pc st).
+ icontinue st = true ->
+ (snd res)=(ipc st).
Proof.
intros; exploit iinst_checker_default_succ; eauto.
erewrite istep_normal_exit; eauto.
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ Lemma iinst_checker_eqlive_stopped ge sp pm alive i res rs1 rs2 m st1:
eqlive_reg (ext alive) rs1 rs2 ->
istep ge i sp rs1 m = Some st1 ->
iinst_checker pm alive i = Some res ->
- continue st1 = false ->
- exists path st2, pm!(the_pc st1) = Some path /\ istep ge i sp rs2 m = Some st2 /\ eqlive_istate (ext path.(input_regs)) st1 st2.
+ icontinue st1 = false ->
+ exists path st2, pm!(ipc st1) = Some path /\ istep ge i sp rs2 m = Some st2 /\ eqlive_istate (ext path.(input_regs)) st1 st2.
Proof.
intros EQLIVE.
set (tmp := istep ge i sp rs2).
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ Lemma ipath_checker_eqlive_normal ge ps (f:function) sp pm: forall alive pc res
eqlive_reg (ext alive) rs1 rs2 ->
ipath_checker ps f pm alive pc = Some res ->
isteps ge ps f sp rs1 m pc = Some st1 ->
- continue st1 = true ->
+ icontinue st1 = true ->
exists st2, isteps ge ps f sp rs2 m pc = Some st2 /\ eqlive_istate (ext (fst res)) st1 st2.
Proof.
induction ps as [|ps]; simpl; try_simplify_someHyps.
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ Proof.
destruct 1 as (st2 & ISTEP & [CONT PC RS MEM]).
try_simplify_someHyps.
rewrite <- CONT, <- MEM, <- PC.
- destruct (continue st0) eqn:CONT'.
+ destruct (icontinue st0) eqn:CONT'.
* intros; exploit iinst_checker_istep_continue; eauto.
rewrite <- PC; intros X; rewrite X in * |-. eauto.
* try_simplify_someHyps.
@@ -243,14 +243,14 @@ Qed.
Lemma ipath_checker_isteps_continue ge ps (f:function) sp pm: forall alive pc res rs m st,
ipath_checker ps f pm alive pc = Some res ->
isteps ge ps f sp rs m pc = Some st ->
- continue st = true ->
- (snd res)=(the_pc st).
+ icontinue st = true ->
+ (snd res)=(ipc st).
Proof.
induction ps as [|ps]; simpl; try_simplify_someHyps.
inversion_SOME i; try_simplify_someHyps.
inversion_SOME res0.
inversion_SOME st0.
- destruct (continue st0) eqn:CONT'.
+ destruct (icontinue st0) eqn:CONT'.
- intros; exploit iinst_checker_istep_continue; eauto.
intros EQ; rewrite EQ in * |-; clear EQ; eauto.
- try_simplify_someHyps; congruence.
@@ -260,15 +260,15 @@ Lemma ipath_checker_eqlive_stopped ge ps (f:function) sp pm: forall alive pc res
eqlive_reg (ext alive) rs1 rs2 ->
ipath_checker ps f pm alive pc = Some res ->
isteps ge ps f sp rs1 m pc = Some st1 ->
- continue st1 = false ->
- exists path st2, pm!(the_pc st1) = Some path /\ isteps ge ps f sp rs2 m pc = Some st2 /\ eqlive_istate (ext path.(input_regs)) st1 st2.
+ icontinue st1 = false ->
+ exists path st2, pm!(ipc st1) = Some path /\ isteps ge ps f sp rs2 m pc = Some st2 /\ eqlive_istate (ext path.(input_regs)) st1 st2.
Proof.
induction ps as [|ps]; simpl; try_simplify_someHyps; try congruence.
inversion_SOME i; try_simplify_someHyps.
inversion_SOME res0.
inversion_SOME st0.
intros.
- destruct (continue st0) eqn:CONT'; try_simplify_someHyps; intros.
+ destruct (icontinue st0) eqn:CONT'; try_simplify_someHyps; intros.
* intros; exploit iinst_checker_eqlive; eauto.
destruct 1 as (st2 & ISTEP & [CONT PC RS MEM]).
exploit iinst_checker_istep_continue; eauto.
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ Proof.
intros PC ISTEP. erewrite inst_checker_from_iinst_checker; eauto.
inversion_SOME res.
intros.
- destruct (continue st1) eqn: CONT.
+ destruct (icontinue st1) eqn: CONT.
- (* CONT => true *)
exploit iinst_checker_eqlive; eauto.
destruct 1 as (st2 & ISTEP2 & [CONT' PC2 RS MEM]).