diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'powerpc/Conventions1.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | powerpc/Conventions1.v | 49 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/powerpc/Conventions1.v b/powerpc/Conventions1.v index 5c9cbd4f..f05e77df 100644 --- a/powerpc/Conventions1.v +++ b/powerpc/Conventions1.v @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ Remark loc_arguments_rec_charact: forall_rpair (loc_argument_charact ofs) p. Proof. assert (X: forall ofs1 ofs2 l, loc_argument_charact ofs2 l -> ofs1 <= ofs2 -> loc_argument_charact ofs1 l). - { destruct l; simpl; intros; auto. destruct sl; auto. intuition omega. } + { destruct l; simpl; intros; auto. destruct sl; auto. intuition lia. } assert (Y: forall ofs1 ofs2 p, forall_rpair (loc_argument_charact ofs2) p -> ofs1 <= ofs2 -> forall_rpair (loc_argument_charact ofs1) p). { destruct p; simpl; intuition eauto. } Opaque list_nth_z. @@ -279,52 +279,52 @@ Opaque list_nth_z. destruct (list_nth_z int_param_regs ir) as [r|] eqn:E; destruct H. subst. left. eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto. eapply IHtyl; eauto. - subst. split. omega. apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. omega. + subst. split. lia. apply Z.divide_1_l. + eapply Y; eauto. lia. - (* float *) - assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; omega). + assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; lia). destruct (list_nth_z float_param_regs fr) as [r|] eqn:E; destruct H. subst. right. eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto. eapply IHtyl; eauto. - subst. split. omega. apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. omega. + subst. split. lia. apply Z.divide_1_l. + eapply Y; eauto. lia. - (* long *) - assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; omega). + assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; lia). set (ir' := align ir 2) in *. destruct (list_nth_z int_param_regs ir') as [r1|] eqn:E1. destruct (list_nth_z int_param_regs (ir' + 1)) as [r2|] eqn:E2. destruct H. subst; split; left; eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto. eapply IHtyl; eauto. destruct H. - subst. destruct Archi.ptr64; [split|split;split]; try omega. - apply align_divides; omega. apply Z.divide_1_l. apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. omega. + subst. destruct Archi.ptr64; [split|split;split]; try lia. + apply align_divides; lia. apply Z.divide_1_l. apply Z.divide_1_l. + eapply Y; eauto. lia. destruct H. - subst. destruct Archi.ptr64; [split|split;split]; try omega. - apply align_divides; omega. apply Z.divide_1_l. apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. omega. + subst. destruct Archi.ptr64; [split|split;split]; try lia. + apply align_divides; lia. apply Z.divide_1_l. apply Z.divide_1_l. + eapply Y; eauto. lia. - (* single *) - assert (ofs <= align ofs 1) by (apply align_le; omega). - assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; omega). + assert (ofs <= align ofs 1) by (apply align_le; lia). + assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; lia). destruct (list_nth_z float_param_regs fr) as [r|] eqn:E; destruct H. subst. right. eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto. eapply IHtyl; eauto. - subst. split. destruct Archi.single_passed_as_single; simpl; omega. + subst. split. destruct Archi.single_passed_as_single; simpl; lia. destruct Archi.single_passed_as_single; simpl; apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. destruct Archi.single_passed_as_single; simpl; omega. + eapply Y; eauto. destruct Archi.single_passed_as_single; simpl; lia. - (* any32 *) destruct (list_nth_z int_param_regs ir) as [r|] eqn:E; destruct H. subst. left. eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto. eapply IHtyl; eauto. - subst. split. omega. apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. omega. + subst. split. lia. apply Z.divide_1_l. + eapply Y; eauto. lia. - (* float *) - assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; omega). + assert (ofs <= align ofs 2) by (apply align_le; lia). destruct (list_nth_z float_param_regs fr) as [r|] eqn:E; destruct H. subst. right. eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto. eapply IHtyl; eauto. - subst. split. omega. apply Z.divide_1_l. - eapply Y; eauto. omega. + subst. split. lia. apply Z.divide_1_l. + eapply Y; eauto. lia. Qed. Lemma loc_arguments_acceptable: @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ Proof. unfold forall_rpair; destruct p; intuition auto. Qed. -Hint Resolve loc_arguments_acceptable: locs. +Global Hint Resolve loc_arguments_acceptable: locs. Lemma loc_arguments_main: loc_arguments signature_main = nil. @@ -349,8 +349,9 @@ Proof. reflexivity. Qed. -(** ** Normalization of function results *) +(** ** Normalization of function results and parameters *) (** No normalization needed. *) Definition return_value_needs_normalization (t: rettype) := false. +Definition parameter_needs_normalization (t: rettype) := false. |