aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/examples
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorckeller <ckeller@users.noreply.github.com>2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100
commit7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea (patch)
treeba7537e1e813cabf9ee0d910f845c71fa5f446e7 /examples
parent36548d6634864a131cc83ce21491c797163de305 (diff)
downloadsmtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.tar.gz
smtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.zip
Merge from LFSC (#26)
* Showing models as coq counter examples in tactic without constructing coq terms * also read models when calling cvc4 with a file (deactivated because cvc4 crashes) * Show counter examples with variables in the order they are quantified in the Coq goal * Circumvent issue with ocamldep * fix issue with dependencies * fix issue with dependencies * Translation and OCaml support for extract, zero_extend, sign_extend * Show run times of components * print time on stdout instead * Tests now work with new version (master) of CVC4 * fix small printing issue * look for date on mac os x * proof of valid_check_bbShl: some cases to prove. * full proof of "left shift checker". * full proof of "rigth shift checker". * Support translation of terms bvlshr, bvshl but LFSC rules do not exists at the moment Bug fix for bitvector extract (inverted arguments) * Typo * More modularity on the format of traces depending on the version of coq * More straightforward definitions in Int63Native_standard * Use the Int31 library with coq-8.5 * Use the most efficient operations of Int31 * Improved performance with coq-8.5 * Uniform treatment of sat and smt tactics * Hopefully solved the problem with universes for the tactic * Updated the installation instructions * Holes for unsupported bit blasting rules * Cherry-picking from smtcoq/smtcoq * bug fix hole for bitblast * Predefined arrays are not required anymore * fix issue with coq bbT and bitof construction from ocaml * bug fix in smtAtom for uninterpreted functions fix verit test file * fix issue with smtlib2 extract parsing * It looks like we still need the PArray function instances for some examples (see vmcai_bytes.smt2) * Solver specific reification: Each solver has a list of supported theories which is passed to Atom.of_coq, this function creates uninterpreted functions / sorts for unsupported features. * show counter-examples with const_farray instead of const for constant array definitions * Vernacular commands to debug checkers. Verit/Lfsc_Checker_Debug will always fail, reporting the first proof step of the certificate that failed be checked * Update INSTALL.md * show smtcoq proof when converting * (Hopefully) repared the universes problems * Corrected a bug with holes in proofs * scripts for tests: create a folder "work" under "lfsc/tests/", locate the benchmarks there. create a folder "results" under "lfsc/tests/work/" in which you'll find the results of ./cvc4tocoq. * make sure to give correct path for your benchs... * Checker for array extensionality modulo symmetry of equality * fix oversight with bitvectors larger than 63 bits * some printing functions for smt2 ast * handle smtlib2 files with more complicated equivalence with (= ... ) * revert: ./cvc4tocoq does not output lfsc proofs... * bug fix one input was ignored * Don't show verit translation of LFSC proof if environment variable DONTSHOWVERIT is set (e.g. put export DONTSHOWVERIT="" in your .bashrc or .bashprofile) * Also sort names of introduced variables when showing counter-example * input files for which SMTCoq retuns false. * input files for which SMTCoq retuns false. * use debug checker for debug file * More efficient debug checker * better approximate number of failing step of certificate in debug checker * fix mistake in ml4 * very first attempt to support goals in Prop * bvs: comparison predicates in Prop and their <-> proofs with the ones in bool farrays: equality predicate in Prop and its <-> proof with the one in bool. * unit, Bool, Z, Pos: comparison and equality predicates in Prop. * a typo fixed. * an example of array equality in Prop (converted into Bool by hand)... TODO: enhance the search space of cvc4 tactic. * first version of cvc4' tactic: "solves" the goals in Prop. WARNING: supports only bv and array goals and might not be complete TODO: add support for lia goals * cvc4' support for lia WARNING: might not be complete! * small fix in cvc4' and some variations of examples * small fix + support for goals in Bool and Bool = true + use of solve tactical WARNING: does not support UF and INT63 goals in Prop * cvc4': better arrangement * cvc4': Prop2Bool by context search... * cvc4': solve tactial added -> do not modify unsolved goals. * developer documentation for the smtcoq repo * cvc4': rudimentary support for uninterpreted function goals in Prop. * cvc4': support for goals with Leibniz equality... WARNING: necessary use of "Grab Existential Variables." to instantiate variable types for farrays! * cvc4': Z.lt adapted + better support from verit... * cvc4': support for Z.le, Z.ge, Z.gt. * Try arrays with default value (with a constructor for constant arrays), but extensionality is not provable * cvc4': support for equality over uninterpreted types * lfsc demo: goals in Coq's Prop. * lfsc demo: goals in Bool. * Fix issue with existential variables generated by prop2bool. - prop2bool tactic exported by SMTCoq - remove useless stuff * update usage and installation instructions * Update INSTALL.md * highlighting * the tactic: bool2prop. * clean up * the tactic smt: very first version. * smt: return unsolved goals in Prop. * Show when a certificate cannot be checked when running the tactic instead of at Qed * Tactic improvements - Handle negation/True/False in prop/bool conversions tactic. - Remove alias for farray (this caused problem for matching on this type in tactics). - Tactic `smt` that combines cvc4 and veriT. - return subgoals in prop * test change header * smt: support for negated goals + some reorganization. * conflicts resolved + some reorganization. * a way to solve the issue with ambiguous coercions. * reorganization. * small change. * another small change. * developer documentation of the tactics. * developer guide: some improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * pass correct environment for conversion + better error messages * cleaning * ReflectFacts added. * re-organizing developers' guide. * re-organizing developers' guide. * re-organizing developers' guide. * removing unused maps. * headers. * artifact readme getting started... * first attempt * second... * third... * 4th... * 5th... * 6th... * 7th... * 8th... * 9th... * 10th... * 11th... * 12th... * 13th... * 14th... * 15th... * 16th... * 17th... * Update artifact.md Use links to lfsc repository like in the paper * 18th... * 19th... * 20th... * 21st... * 22nd... * 23rd... * 24th... * 25th... * 26th... * 27th... * 28th... * Update artifact.md Small reorganization * minor edits * More minor edits * revised description of tactics * Final pass * typo * name changed: artifact-readme.md * file added... * passwd chaged... * links... * removal * performance statement... * typos... * the link to the artifact image updated... * suggestions by Guy... * aux files removed... * clean-up... * clean-up... * some small changes... * small fix... * additional information on newly created files after running cvc4tocoq script... * some small fix... * another small fix... * typo... * small fix... * another small fix... * fix... * link to the artifact image... * We do not want to force vm_cast for the Theorem commands * no_check variants of the tactics * TODO: a veriT test does not work anymore * Compiles with both versions of Coq * Test of the tactics in real conditions * Comment on this case study * an example for the FroCoS paper. * Fix smt tactic that doesn't return cvc4's subgoals * readme modifications * readme modifications 2 * small typo in readme. * small changes in readme. * small changes in readme. * typo in readme. * Sync with https://github.com/LFSC/smtcoq * Port to Coq 8.6 * README * README * INSTALL * Missing file * Yves' proposition for installation instructions * Updated link to CVC4 * Compiles again with native-coq * Compiles with both versions of Coq * Command to bypass typechecking when generating a zchaff theorem * Solved bug on cuts from Hole * Counter-models for uninterpreted sorts (improves issue #13) * OCaml version note (#15) * update .gitignore * needs OCaml 4.04.0 * Solving merge issues (under progress) * Make SmtBtype compile * Compilation of SmtForm under progress * Make SmtForm compile * Make SmtCertif compile * Make SmtTrace compile * Make SatAtom compile * Make smtAtom compile * Make CnfParser compile * Make Zchaff compile * Make VeritSyntax compile * Make VeritParser compile * Make lfsc/tosmtcoq compile * Make smtlib2_genconstr compile * smtCommand under progress * smtCommands and verit compile again * lfsc compiles * ml4 compiles * Everything compiles * All ZChaff unit tests and most verit unit tests (but taut5 and un_menteur) go through * Most LFSC tests ok; some fail due to the problem of verit; a few fail due to an error "Not_found" to investigate * Authors and headings * Compiles with native-coq * Typo
Diffstat (limited to 'examples')
-rw-r--r--examples/Example.v146
-rw-r--r--examples/InsertionSort.v151
-rw-r--r--examples/Non_terminating.v12
-rw-r--r--examples/euf.log8
-rw-r--r--examples/euf.smt211
-rw-r--r--examples/lia.lfsc43
-rw-r--r--examples/lia.smt25
-rw-r--r--examples/lia.vtlog7
-rw-r--r--examples/one_equality_switch.v12
-rw-r--r--examples/switching_input.v12
-rw-r--r--examples/sym_zeq.v12
11 files changed, 380 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/examples/Example.v b/examples/Example.v
index 0dba915..c07fb40 100644
--- a/examples/Example.v
+++ b/examples/Example.v
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+(**************************************************************************)
+(* *)
+(* SMTCoq *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
+(* *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
+(* *)
+(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
+(* *)
+(**************************************************************************)
+
+
(* [Require Import SMTCoq.SMTCoq.] loads the SMTCoq library.
If you are using native-coq instead of Coq 8.6, replace it with:
Require Import SMTCoq.
@@ -5,7 +17,15 @@
Require Import SMTCoq.SMTCoq.
Require Import Bool.
-Local Open Scope int63_scope.
+
+Local Open Scope Z_scope.
+
+Import BVList.BITVECTOR_LIST.
+Local Open Scope bv_scope.
+
+Import FArray.
+Local Open Scope farray_scope.
+
(* Examples that check ZChaff certificates *)
@@ -15,12 +35,21 @@ Check sat.
Zchaff_Checker "hole4.cnf" "hole4.log".
-(* Example that checks a VeriT certificate, for logic QF_UF *)
+
+(* Example that checks a VeriT certificate, for logic QF_UFLIA *)
Section Verit.
- Verit_Checker "euf.smt2" "euf.log".
+ Verit_Checker "lia.smt2" "lia.vtlog".
End Verit.
+
+(* Example that checks a LFSC certificate, for logic QF_UFLIA *)
+
+Section Lfsc.
+ Lfsc_Checker "lia.smt2" "lia.lfsc".
+End Lfsc.
+
+
(* Examples of the zchaff tactic (requires zchaff in your PATH
environment variable):
- with booleans
@@ -33,41 +62,119 @@ Proof.
Qed.
Goal forall i j k,
- let a := i == j in
- let b := j == k in
- let c := k == i in
+ let a := (i == j)%int in
+ let b := (j == k)%int in
+ let c := (k == i)%int in
(a || b || c) && ((negb a) || (negb b) || (negb c)) && ((negb a) || b) && ((negb b) || c) && ((negb c) || a) = false.
Proof.
zchaff.
Qed.
-(* Examples of the verit tactic (requires verit in your PATH environment
- variable):
- - with booleans
- - in logics QF_UF and QF_LIA *)
+
+(* Examples of the verit tactics (requires verit in your PATH environment
+ variable), which handle
+ - propositional logic
+ - theory of equality
+ - linear integer arithmetic *)
Goal forall a b c, ((a || b || c) && ((negb a) || (negb b) || (negb c)) && ((negb a) || b) && ((negb b) || c) && ((negb c) || a)) = false.
Proof.
- verit.
+ verit_bool.
Qed.
-
Goal forall (a b : Z) (P : Z -> bool) (f : Z -> Z),
- negb (f a =? b) || negb (P (f a)) || (P b).
+ (negb (Z.eqb (f a) b)) || (negb (P (f a))) || (P b).
Proof.
- verit.
+ verit_bool.
Qed.
Goal forall b1 b2 x1 x2,
- implb
- (ifb b1
- (ifb b2 (2*x1+1 =? 2*x2+1) (2*x1+1 =? 2*x2))
- (ifb b2 (2*x1 =? 2*x2+1) (2*x1 =? 2*x2)))
- ((implb b1 b2) && (implb b2 b1) && (x1 =? x2)).
+ implb
+ (ifb b1
+ (ifb b2 (Z.eqb (2*x1+1) (2*x2+1)) (Z.eqb (2*x1+1) (2*x2)))
+ (ifb b2 (Z.eqb (2*x1) (2*x2+1)) (Z.eqb (2*x1) (2*x2))))
+ ((implb b1 b2) && (implb b2 b1) && (Z.eqb x1 x2)).
+Proof.
+ verit_bool.
+Qed.
+
+Goal forall
+ (x y: Z)
+ (f: Z -> Z),
+ x = y + 1 -> f y = f (x - 1).
Proof.
verit.
Qed.
+
+(* Examples of the smt tactic (requires verit and cvc4 in your PATH environment
+ variable):
+ - propositional logic
+ - theory of equality
+ - linear integer arithmetic
+ - theory of fixed-sized bit-vectors
+ - theory of arrays *)
+
+Goal forall a b c, ((a || b || c) && ((negb a) || (negb b) || (negb c)) && ((negb a) || b) && ((negb b) || c) && ((negb c) || a)) = false.
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+
+Goal forall (a b : Z) (P : Z -> bool) (f : Z -> Z),
+ (negb (Z.eqb (f a) b)) || (negb (P (f a))) || (P b).
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+Goal forall b1 b2 x1 x2,
+ implb
+ (ifb b1
+ (ifb b2 (Z.eqb (2*x1+1) (2*x2+1)) (Z.eqb (2*x1+1) (2*x2)))
+ (ifb b2 (Z.eqb (2*x1) (2*x2+1)) (Z.eqb (2*x1) (2*x2))))
+ ((implb b1 b2) && (implb b2 b1) && (Z.eqb x1 x2)).
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+
+Goal forall
+ (x y: Z)
+ (f: Z -> Z),
+ x = y + 1 -> f y = f (x - 1).
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+
+Goal forall (bv1 bv2 bv3: bitvector 4),
+ bv1 = #b|0|0|0|0| /\
+ bv2 = #b|1|0|0|0| /\
+ bv3 = #b|1|1|0|0| ->
+ bv_ultP bv1 bv2 /\ bv_ultP bv2 bv3.
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+
+Goal forall (a b c d: farray Z Z),
+ b[0 <- 4] = c ->
+ d = b[0 <- 4][1 <- 4] ->
+ a = d[1 <- b[1]] ->
+ a = c.
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+
+Goal forall (a b: farray Z Z) (v w x y z t: Z)
+ (r s: bitvector 4)
+ (f: Z -> Z)
+ (g: farray Z Z -> Z)
+ (h: bitvector 4 -> Z),
+ a[x <- v] = b /\ a[y <- w] = b ->
+ a[z <- w] = b /\ a[t <- v] = b ->
+ r = s -> v < x + 10 /\ v > x - 5 ->
+ ~ (g a = g b) \/ f (h r) = f (h s).
+Proof.
+ smt.
+Qed.
+
+
(* Examples of using the conversion tactics *)
Local Open Scope positive_scope.
@@ -231,7 +338,6 @@ Section group.
Lemma unique_identity e':
(forall z, op e' z =? z) -> e' =? e.
Proof. intros pe'. verit_base pe'; vauto. Qed.
-
Lemma simplification_right x1 x2 y:
op x1 y =? op x2 y -> x1 =? x2.
Proof. intro H. verit_base H; vauto. Qed.
diff --git a/examples/InsertionSort.v b/examples/InsertionSort.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fcd5dfc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/examples/InsertionSort.v
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+(**************************************************************************)
+(* *)
+(* SMTCoq *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
+(* *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
+(* *)
+(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
+(* *)
+(**************************************************************************)
+
+
+(* This example tests the tactics in "real" condition: a part of the
+ proof of correctness of insertion sort. It requires propositional
+ reasoning, uninterpreted functions, and a bit of integer arithmetic.
+
+ Ideally, the proof of each lemma should consists only on
+ induction/destruct followed by a call to [smt]. What we currently
+ lack:
+ - we have to provide all the needed lemmas and unfold all the
+ definitions
+ - it requires too much from uninterpreted functions even when it is
+ not needed
+ - it sometimes fails? (may be realted to the previous item)
+ *)
+
+
+Add Rec LoadPath "../src" as SMTCoq.
+
+Require Import SMTCoq.
+Require Import ZArith List Bool.
+
+
+(* We should really make SMTCoq work with SSReflect! *)
+
+Lemma impl_implb (a b:bool) : (a -> b) <-> (a --> b).
+Proof. auto using (reflect_iff _ _ (ReflectFacts.implyP a b)). Qed.
+
+
+Lemma eq_false b : b = false <-> negb b.
+Proof. case b; intuition. Qed.
+
+
+Section InsertionSort.
+
+ Fixpoint insert (x:Z) (l:list Z) : list Z :=
+ match l with
+ | nil => x::nil
+ | y::ys => if (x <=? y)%Z then x::y::ys else y::(insert x ys)
+ end.
+
+ Fixpoint sort (l:list Z) : list Z :=
+ match l with
+ | nil => nil
+ | x::xs => insert x (sort xs)
+ end.
+
+
+ Section Spec.
+
+ Fixpoint is_sorted (l:list Z) : bool :=
+ match l with
+ | nil => true
+ | x::xs =>
+ match xs with
+ | nil => true
+ | y::_ => (x <=? y)%Z && (is_sorted xs)
+ end
+ end.
+
+ Fixpoint smaller (x:Z) (l:list Z) : bool :=
+ match l with
+ | nil => true
+ | y::ys => (x <=? y)%Z && (smaller x ys)
+ end.
+
+
+ Lemma is_sorted_smaller x y ys :
+ (((x <=? y) && is_sorted (y :: ys)) --> is_sorted (x :: ys)).
+ Proof.
+ destruct ys as [ |z zs].
+ - simpl. smt.
+ - change (is_sorted (y :: z :: zs)) with ((y <=? z)%Z && (is_sorted (z::zs))).
+ change (is_sorted (x :: z :: zs)) with ((x <=? z)%Z && (is_sorted (z::zs))).
+ (* [smt] or [verit] fail? *)
+ assert (H:forall b, (x <=? y) && ((y <=? z) && b) --> (x <=? z) && b) by smt.
+ apply H.
+ Qed.
+
+
+ Lemma is_sorted_cons x xs :
+ (is_sorted (x::xs)) <--> (is_sorted xs && smaller x xs).
+ Proof.
+ induction xs as [ |y ys IHys].
+ - reflexivity.
+ - change (is_sorted (x :: y :: ys)) with ((x <=? y)%Z && (is_sorted (y::ys))).
+ change (smaller x (y :: ys)) with ((x <=? y)%Z && (smaller x ys)).
+ generalize (is_sorted_smaller x y ys). revert IHys. rewrite !impl_implb.
+ (* Idem *)
+ assert (H:forall a b c d, (a <--> b && c) -->
+ ((x <=? y) && d --> a) -->
+ ((x <=? y) && d <-->
+ d && ((x <=? y) && c))) by smt.
+ apply H.
+ Qed.
+
+
+ Lemma insert_keeps_smaller x y ys :
+ smaller y ys --> (y <=? x) --> smaller y (insert x ys).
+ Proof.
+ induction ys as [ |z zs IHzs].
+ - simpl. smt.
+ - simpl. case (x <=? z).
+ + simpl.
+ (* [smt] or [verit] require [Compec (list Z)] but they should not *)
+ assert (H:forall a, (y <=? z) && a --> (y <=? x) --> (y <=? x) && ((y <=? z) && a)) by smt.
+ apply H.
+ + simpl. revert IHzs. rewrite impl_implb.
+ (* Idem *)
+ assert (H:forall a b, (a --> (y <=? x) --> b) --> (y <=? z) && a --> (y <=? x) --> (y <=? z) && b) by smt.
+ apply H.
+ Qed.
+
+
+ Lemma insert_keeps_sorted x l : is_sorted l -> is_sorted (insert x l).
+ Proof.
+ induction l as [ |y ys IHys].
+ - reflexivity.
+ - intro H. simpl. case_eq (x <=? y); intro Heq.
+ + change ((x <=? y)%Z && (is_sorted (y::ys))). rewrite Heq, H. reflexivity.
+ + rewrite eq_false in Heq.
+ rewrite (eqb_prop _ _ (is_sorted_cons _ _)) in H.
+ rewrite (eqb_prop _ _ (is_sorted_cons _ _)).
+ generalize (insert_keeps_smaller x y ys).
+ revert IHys H Heq. rewrite !impl_implb.
+ (* Idem *)
+ assert (H: forall a b c d, (a --> b) --> a && c --> negb (x <=? y) --> (c --> (y <=? x) --> d) --> b && d) by smt.
+ apply H.
+ Qed.
+
+
+ Theorem sort_sorts l : is_sorted (sort l).
+ Proof.
+ induction l as [ |x xs IHxs].
+ - reflexivity.
+ - simpl. now apply insert_keeps_sorted.
+ Qed.
+
+ End Spec.
+
+End InsertionSort.
diff --git a/examples/Non_terminating.v b/examples/Non_terminating.v
index 087301a..7dad08f 100644
--- a/examples/Non_terminating.v
+++ b/examples/Non_terminating.v
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+(**************************************************************************)
+(* *)
+(* SMTCoq *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
+(* *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
+(* *)
+(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
+(* *)
+(**************************************************************************)
+
+
Require Import SMTCoq.
Parameter g : Z -> Z.
diff --git a/examples/euf.log b/examples/euf.log
deleted file mode 100644
index 3bccc6a..0000000
--- a/examples/euf.log
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-1:(input (#1:(and #2:(= b a) #3:(= b c) #4:(= c d) #5:(= e c) #6:(= e f) (not #7:(= a f)))))
-2:(and (#2) 1 0)
-3:(and (#3) 1 1)
-4:(and (#5) 1 3)
-5:(and (#6) 1 4)
-6:(and ((not #7)) 1 5)
-7:(eq_transitive ((not #2) (not #3) (not #5) (not #6) #7))
-8:(resolution () 7 2 3 4 5 6)
diff --git a/examples/euf.smt2 b/examples/euf.smt2
deleted file mode 100644
index c151654..0000000
--- a/examples/euf.smt2
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-(set-logic QF_UF)
-(declare-sort U 0)
-(declare-fun a () U)
-(declare-fun b () U)
-(declare-fun c () U)
-(declare-fun d () U)
-(declare-fun e () U)
-(declare-fun f () U)
-(assert (and (= a b) (= b c) (= c d) (= c e) (= e f) (not (= a f))))
-(check-sat)
-(exit)
diff --git a/examples/lia.lfsc b/examples/lia.lfsc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1aa900b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/examples/lia.lfsc
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+unsat
+(check
+ ;; Declarations
+(% x (term Int)
+(% A1 (th_holds true)
+(% A0 (th_holds (not (impl (= Int (-_Int x (a_int 3) ) (a_int 7) ) (<=_Int (a_int 10) x) )))
+(: (holds cln)
+
+ ;; Printing deferred declarations
+
+
+;; BV const letification
+
+
+
+ ;; Printing the global let map
+(@ let1 false
+
+ ;; Printing aliasing declarations
+
+
+ ;; Rewrites for Lemmas
+
+ ;; In the preprocessor we trust
+(th_let_pf _ (trust_f false) (\ .PA205
+(th_let_pf _ (trust_f (not let1)) (\ .PA227
+
+;; Printing mapping from preprocessed assertions into atoms
+(decl_atom let1 (\ .v1 (\ .a1
+(satlem _ _ (ast _ _ _ .a1 (\ .l3 (clausify_false (contra _ .l3 .PA227)))) (\ .pb1
+(satlem _ _ (asf _ _ _ .a1 (\ .l2 (clausify_false (contra _ .PA205 .l2)))) (\ .pb4
+ ;; Theory Lemmas
+
+;; BB atom mapping
+
+
+;; Bit-blasting definitional clauses
+
+
+ ;; Bit-blasting learned clauses
+
+(satlem_simplify _ _ _ (R _ _ .pb4 .pb1 .v1) (\ empty empty)))))))))))))))))))
+;;
diff --git a/examples/lia.smt2 b/examples/lia.smt2
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..df290d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/examples/lia.smt2
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+(set-logic QF_LIA)
+(declare-fun x () Int)
+(assert (not (=> (= (- x 3) 7) (<= 10 x))))
+(check-sat)
+(exit)
diff --git a/examples/lia.vtlog b/examples/lia.vtlog
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3a03ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/examples/lia.vtlog
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+1:(input ((not #1:(=> #2:(= #3:(- x 3) 7) #4:(<= 10 x)))))
+2:(tmp_LA_pre ((not #5:(=> #6:(and #7:(<= #3 7) #8:(<= 7 #3)) #4))) 1)
+3:(not_implies1 (#6) 2)
+4:(and (#8) 3 1)
+5:(not_implies2 ((not #4)) 2)
+6:(la_generic (#4 (not #8)))
+7:(resolution () 6 4 5)
diff --git a/examples/one_equality_switch.v b/examples/one_equality_switch.v
index 3473d08..61fd9c7 100644
--- a/examples/one_equality_switch.v
+++ b/examples/one_equality_switch.v
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+(**************************************************************************)
+(* *)
+(* SMTCoq *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
+(* *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
+(* *)
+(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
+(* *)
+(**************************************************************************)
+
+
Require Import SMTCoq.
Require Import Bool.
Local Open Scope int63_scope.
diff --git a/examples/switching_input.v b/examples/switching_input.v
index 52261d8..629a3ad 100644
--- a/examples/switching_input.v
+++ b/examples/switching_input.v
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+(**************************************************************************)
+(* *)
+(* SMTCoq *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
+(* *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
+(* *)
+(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
+(* *)
+(**************************************************************************)
+
+
Require Import SMTCoq.
Require Import Bool.
Local Open Scope int63_scope.
diff --git a/examples/sym_zeq.v b/examples/sym_zeq.v
index b940490..1c4be83 100644
--- a/examples/sym_zeq.v
+++ b/examples/sym_zeq.v
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+(**************************************************************************)
+(* *)
+(* SMTCoq *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
+(* *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
+(* *)
+(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
+(* *)
+(**************************************************************************)
+
+
Require Import SMTCoq.
Require Import Bool.
Local Open Scope int63_scope.