aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/spl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorckeller <ckeller@users.noreply.github.com>2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100
commit7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea (patch)
treeba7537e1e813cabf9ee0d910f845c71fa5f446e7 /src/spl
parent36548d6634864a131cc83ce21491c797163de305 (diff)
downloadsmtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.tar.gz
smtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.zip
Merge from LFSC (#26)
* Showing models as coq counter examples in tactic without constructing coq terms * also read models when calling cvc4 with a file (deactivated because cvc4 crashes) * Show counter examples with variables in the order they are quantified in the Coq goal * Circumvent issue with ocamldep * fix issue with dependencies * fix issue with dependencies * Translation and OCaml support for extract, zero_extend, sign_extend * Show run times of components * print time on stdout instead * Tests now work with new version (master) of CVC4 * fix small printing issue * look for date on mac os x * proof of valid_check_bbShl: some cases to prove. * full proof of "left shift checker". * full proof of "rigth shift checker". * Support translation of terms bvlshr, bvshl but LFSC rules do not exists at the moment Bug fix for bitvector extract (inverted arguments) * Typo * More modularity on the format of traces depending on the version of coq * More straightforward definitions in Int63Native_standard * Use the Int31 library with coq-8.5 * Use the most efficient operations of Int31 * Improved performance with coq-8.5 * Uniform treatment of sat and smt tactics * Hopefully solved the problem with universes for the tactic * Updated the installation instructions * Holes for unsupported bit blasting rules * Cherry-picking from smtcoq/smtcoq * bug fix hole for bitblast * Predefined arrays are not required anymore * fix issue with coq bbT and bitof construction from ocaml * bug fix in smtAtom for uninterpreted functions fix verit test file * fix issue with smtlib2 extract parsing * It looks like we still need the PArray function instances for some examples (see vmcai_bytes.smt2) * Solver specific reification: Each solver has a list of supported theories which is passed to Atom.of_coq, this function creates uninterpreted functions / sorts for unsupported features. * show counter-examples with const_farray instead of const for constant array definitions * Vernacular commands to debug checkers. Verit/Lfsc_Checker_Debug will always fail, reporting the first proof step of the certificate that failed be checked * Update INSTALL.md * show smtcoq proof when converting * (Hopefully) repared the universes problems * Corrected a bug with holes in proofs * scripts for tests: create a folder "work" under "lfsc/tests/", locate the benchmarks there. create a folder "results" under "lfsc/tests/work/" in which you'll find the results of ./cvc4tocoq. * make sure to give correct path for your benchs... * Checker for array extensionality modulo symmetry of equality * fix oversight with bitvectors larger than 63 bits * some printing functions for smt2 ast * handle smtlib2 files with more complicated equivalence with (= ... ) * revert: ./cvc4tocoq does not output lfsc proofs... * bug fix one input was ignored * Don't show verit translation of LFSC proof if environment variable DONTSHOWVERIT is set (e.g. put export DONTSHOWVERIT="" in your .bashrc or .bashprofile) * Also sort names of introduced variables when showing counter-example * input files for which SMTCoq retuns false. * input files for which SMTCoq retuns false. * use debug checker for debug file * More efficient debug checker * better approximate number of failing step of certificate in debug checker * fix mistake in ml4 * very first attempt to support goals in Prop * bvs: comparison predicates in Prop and their <-> proofs with the ones in bool farrays: equality predicate in Prop and its <-> proof with the one in bool. * unit, Bool, Z, Pos: comparison and equality predicates in Prop. * a typo fixed. * an example of array equality in Prop (converted into Bool by hand)... TODO: enhance the search space of cvc4 tactic. * first version of cvc4' tactic: "solves" the goals in Prop. WARNING: supports only bv and array goals and might not be complete TODO: add support for lia goals * cvc4' support for lia WARNING: might not be complete! * small fix in cvc4' and some variations of examples * small fix + support for goals in Bool and Bool = true + use of solve tactical WARNING: does not support UF and INT63 goals in Prop * cvc4': better arrangement * cvc4': Prop2Bool by context search... * cvc4': solve tactial added -> do not modify unsolved goals. * developer documentation for the smtcoq repo * cvc4': rudimentary support for uninterpreted function goals in Prop. * cvc4': support for goals with Leibniz equality... WARNING: necessary use of "Grab Existential Variables." to instantiate variable types for farrays! * cvc4': Z.lt adapted + better support from verit... * cvc4': support for Z.le, Z.ge, Z.gt. * Try arrays with default value (with a constructor for constant arrays), but extensionality is not provable * cvc4': support for equality over uninterpreted types * lfsc demo: goals in Coq's Prop. * lfsc demo: goals in Bool. * Fix issue with existential variables generated by prop2bool. - prop2bool tactic exported by SMTCoq - remove useless stuff * update usage and installation instructions * Update INSTALL.md * highlighting * the tactic: bool2prop. * clean up * the tactic smt: very first version. * smt: return unsolved goals in Prop. * Show when a certificate cannot be checked when running the tactic instead of at Qed * Tactic improvements - Handle negation/True/False in prop/bool conversions tactic. - Remove alias for farray (this caused problem for matching on this type in tactics). - Tactic `smt` that combines cvc4 and veriT. - return subgoals in prop * test change header * smt: support for negated goals + some reorganization. * conflicts resolved + some reorganization. * a way to solve the issue with ambiguous coercions. * reorganization. * small change. * another small change. * developer documentation of the tactics. * developer guide: some improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * pass correct environment for conversion + better error messages * cleaning * ReflectFacts added. * re-organizing developers' guide. * re-organizing developers' guide. * re-organizing developers' guide. * removing unused maps. * headers. * artifact readme getting started... * first attempt * second... * third... * 4th... * 5th... * 6th... * 7th... * 8th... * 9th... * 10th... * 11th... * 12th... * 13th... * 14th... * 15th... * 16th... * 17th... * Update artifact.md Use links to lfsc repository like in the paper * 18th... * 19th... * 20th... * 21st... * 22nd... * 23rd... * 24th... * 25th... * 26th... * 27th... * 28th... * Update artifact.md Small reorganization * minor edits * More minor edits * revised description of tactics * Final pass * typo * name changed: artifact-readme.md * file added... * passwd chaged... * links... * removal * performance statement... * typos... * the link to the artifact image updated... * suggestions by Guy... * aux files removed... * clean-up... * clean-up... * some small changes... * small fix... * additional information on newly created files after running cvc4tocoq script... * some small fix... * another small fix... * typo... * small fix... * another small fix... * fix... * link to the artifact image... * We do not want to force vm_cast for the Theorem commands * no_check variants of the tactics * TODO: a veriT test does not work anymore * Compiles with both versions of Coq * Test of the tactics in real conditions * Comment on this case study * an example for the FroCoS paper. * Fix smt tactic that doesn't return cvc4's subgoals * readme modifications * readme modifications 2 * small typo in readme. * small changes in readme. * small changes in readme. * typo in readme. * Sync with https://github.com/LFSC/smtcoq * Port to Coq 8.6 * README * README * INSTALL * Missing file * Yves' proposition for installation instructions * Updated link to CVC4 * Compiles again with native-coq * Compiles with both versions of Coq * Command to bypass typechecking when generating a zchaff theorem * Solved bug on cuts from Hole * Counter-models for uninterpreted sorts (improves issue #13) * OCaml version note (#15) * update .gitignore * needs OCaml 4.04.0 * Solving merge issues (under progress) * Make SmtBtype compile * Compilation of SmtForm under progress * Make SmtForm compile * Make SmtCertif compile * Make SmtTrace compile * Make SatAtom compile * Make smtAtom compile * Make CnfParser compile * Make Zchaff compile * Make VeritSyntax compile * Make VeritParser compile * Make lfsc/tosmtcoq compile * Make smtlib2_genconstr compile * smtCommand under progress * smtCommands and verit compile again * lfsc compiles * ml4 compiles * Everything compiles * All ZChaff unit tests and most verit unit tests (but taut5 and un_menteur) go through * Most LFSC tests ok; some fail due to the problem of verit; a few fail due to an error "Not_found" to investigate * Authors and headings * Compiles with native-coq * Typo
Diffstat (limited to 'src/spl')
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Arithmetic.v18
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Assumptions.v14
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Operators.v67
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Syntactic.v110
4 files changed, 140 insertions, 69 deletions
diff --git a/src/spl/Arithmetic.v b/src/spl/Arithmetic.v
index 8ec41ab..05c999d 100644
--- a/src/spl/Arithmetic.v
+++ b/src/spl/Arithmetic.v
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
(**************************************************************************)
(* *)
(* SMTCoq *)
-(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2016 *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
(* *)
-(* Michaël Armand *)
-(* Benjamin Grégoire *)
-(* Chantal Keller *)
-(* *)
-(* Inria - École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Sud *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
(* *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
(* *)
@@ -16,8 +12,6 @@
(*** Spl -- a small checker for simplifications ***)
-(* Add LoadPath ".." as SMTCoq. *)
-(* Add LoadPath "../lia" as SMTCoq.lia. *)
Require Import List PArray Bool Int63 ZMicromega.
Require Import Misc State SMT_terms.
Require Lia.
@@ -52,7 +46,7 @@ Section Arith.
Section Valid.
- Variables (t_i : array typ_eqb)
+ Variables (t_i : array SMT_classes.typ_compdec)
(t_func : array (Atom.tval t_i))
(ch_atom : Atom.check_atom t_atom)
(ch_form : Form.check_form t_form)
@@ -60,12 +54,14 @@ Section Arith.
Local Notation interp_form_hatom :=
(Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom).
+ Local Notation interp_form_hatom_bv :=
+ (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom).
Local Notation rho :=
- (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom t_form).
+ (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form).
Let wf_rho : Valuation.wf rho.
- Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom _ ch_form); auto. Qed.
+ Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv _ ch_form); auto. Qed.
Hint Immediate wf_rho.
diff --git a/src/spl/Assumptions.v b/src/spl/Assumptions.v
index b3dee4b..b219da4 100644
--- a/src/spl/Assumptions.v
+++ b/src/spl/Assumptions.v
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
(**************************************************************************)
(* *)
(* SMTCoq *)
-(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2016 *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
(* *)
-(* Michaël Armand *)
-(* Benjamin Grégoire *)
-(* Chantal Keller *)
-(* *)
-(* Inria - École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Sud *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
(* *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
(* *)
@@ -78,17 +74,18 @@ End Checker.
Section Checker_correct.
- Variable t_i : array typ_eqb.
+ Variable t_i : array SMT_classes.typ_compdec.
Variable t_func : array (Atom.tval t_i).
Variable t_atom : array Atom.atom.
Variable t_form : array Form.form.
- Local Notation rho := (Form.interp_state_var (Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom) t_form).
+ Local Notation rho := (Form.interp_state_var (Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom) (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom) t_form).
Variable s : S.t.
Hypothesis Hs : S.valid rho s.
Hypothesis Ht3 : Valuation.wf
(Form.interp_state_var (Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom)
+ (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom)
t_form).
Lemma interp_check_clause c1 : forall c2,
@@ -124,6 +121,7 @@ Section Checker_correct.
Variable concl : C.t.
Hypothesis p : interp_conseq_uf
(Form.interp_state_var (Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom)
+ (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom)
t_form) prem concl.
Lemma valid_check_hole: C.valid rho (check_hole s prem_id prem concl).
diff --git a/src/spl/Operators.v b/src/spl/Operators.v
index c597fe9..f0aba15 100644
--- a/src/spl/Operators.v
+++ b/src/spl/Operators.v
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
(**************************************************************************)
(* *)
(* SMTCoq *)
-(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2016 *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
(* *)
-(* Michaël Armand *)
-(* Benjamin Grégoire *)
-(* Chantal Keller *)
-(* *)
-(* Inria - École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Sud *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
(* *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
(* *)
@@ -16,8 +12,6 @@
(*** Spl -- a small checker for simplifications ***)
-(* Add LoadPath ".." as SMTCoq. *)
-(* Add LoadPath "../lia" as SMTCoq.lia. *)
Require Import List PArray Bool Int63 ZMicromega.
Require Import Misc State SMT_terms.
@@ -171,9 +165,16 @@ Section Operators.
(get_atom a = Atom.Abop (Atom.BO_eq A) x y \/
get_atom a = Atom.Abop (Atom.BO_eq A) y x))).
Proof.
- intros A dist diseq; unfold check_diseqs; rewrite andb_true_iff, PArray.forallb_spec, check_diseqs_complete_spec, length_mapi; split; intros [H1 H2]; split.
- clear H2; intros i Hi; generalize (H1 _ Hi); rewrite get_mapi; auto; case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); try discriminate; intro Heq1; case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit (diseq .[ i]))); try discriminate; intros a Heq2; case_eq (get_atom a); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | |B]; try discriminate; intros h1 h2 Heq3; case_eq (Typ.eqb A B); try discriminate; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intro; subst B; case_eq (h1 == h2); try discriminate; rewrite eqb_false_spec; intro H2; case_eq (check_in h1 dist); try discriminate; case_eq (check_in h2 dist); try discriminate; rewrite !check_in_spec; intros H3 H4 _; split; try discriminate; exists a; split; auto; exists h1, h2; repeat split; auto; rewrite <- In2_In; auto.
- clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 H4]]; clear H2; rewrite get_mapi in H4; auto; exists i; split; auto; generalize H4; case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); intro Heq; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit (diseq .[ i]))); [intros a| | |intros a1 a2|intros a1|intros a1|intros a1|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2 a3]; intro Heq2; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (get_atom a); [intros a1|intros a1 a2|intros [ | | | | | | |B] h1 h2|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2]; intro Heq3; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (Typ.eqb A B); try (intros _ [H|H]; discriminate); change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intro; subst B; case_eq (h1 == h2); try (intros _ [H|H]; discriminate); rewrite eqb_false_spec; intro H10; case (check_in h1 dist); try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case (check_in h2 dist); try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); simpl; intro H3; split; try discriminate; exists a; split; auto; destruct H3 as [H3|H3]; inversion H3; subst; auto.
+ intros A dist diseq; unfold check_diseqs; rewrite andb_true_iff,
+ PArray.forallb_spec, check_diseqs_complete_spec, length_mapi; split; intros [H1 H2]; split.
+ clear H2; intros i Hi; generalize (H1 _ Hi); rewrite get_mapi;
+ auto; case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); try discriminate; intro Heq1; case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit (diseq .[ i])));
+ try discriminate; intros a Heq2; case_eq (get_atom a); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | | B | | | | | | | | | | | | | ]; try discriminate; intros h1 h2 Heq3; case_eq (Typ.eqb A B); try discriminate; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intro; subst B; case_eq (h1 == h2); try discriminate; rewrite eqb_false_spec; intro H2; case_eq (check_in h1 dist); try discriminate; case_eq (check_in h2 dist); try discriminate; rewrite !check_in_spec; intros H3 H4 _; split; try discriminate; exists a; split; auto; exists h1, h2; repeat split; auto; rewrite <- In2_In; auto.
+ clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 H4]]; clear H2; rewrite get_mapi in H4; auto; exists i; split; auto; generalize H4;
+
+ case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); intro Heq; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit (diseq .[ i]))); [intros a| | |intros a1 a2|intros a1|intros a1|intros a1|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2| intros a1 a2 a3|intros a ls]; intro Heq2; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (get_atom a); [intros a1|intros a1 a2|intros [ | | | | | | | B | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] h1 h2|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2 | intros a1 a2]; intro Heq3; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); try (case_eq (Typ.eqb A B); try (intros _ [H|H]; discriminate); change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intro; subst B; case_eq (h1 == h2); try (intros _ [H|H]; discriminate); rewrite eqb_false_spec; intro H10; case (check_in h1 dist); try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case (check_in h2 dist); try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); simpl; intro H3; split; try discriminate; exists a; split; auto; destruct H3 as [H3|H3]; inversion H3; subst; auto).
+intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
+
clear H2; intros i Hi; rewrite get_mapi; auto; destruct (H1 _ Hi) as [H2 [a [H3 [h1 [h2 [H4 [H5 H6]]]]]]]; clear H1; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto); rewrite H3, H4, Typ.eqb_refl; simpl; replace (h1 == h2) with false by (case_eq (h1 == h2); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; intro H; elim H5; auto); simpl; rewrite <- In2_In, <- !check_in_spec in H6; auto; destruct H6 as [H6 H7]; rewrite H6, H7; auto.
clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 [H3 [a [H4 [H6 H5]]]]]]; clear H2; exists i; split; auto; rewrite get_mapi; auto; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto); rewrite H4; assert (H7 := or_introl (In2 y x dist) Hxy); rewrite <- In2_In, <- !check_in_spec in H7; auto; destruct H7 as [H7 H8]; destruct H5 as [H5|H5]; rewrite H5, Typ.eqb_refl; [replace (x == y) with false by (case_eq (x == y); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; auto)|replace (y == x) with false by (case_eq (y == x); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; auto)]; simpl; rewrite H7, H8; auto.
Qed.
@@ -246,14 +247,14 @@ Section Operators.
get_atom hb = Atom.Abop (Atom.BO_eq ty) y x).
Proof.
intros f1 f2; unfold check_distinct_two_args; split.
- case (get_form f1); try discriminate; intro ha; case (get_form f2); try discriminate; intro hb; case_eq (get_atom ha); try discriminate; intros [A] [ |x [ |y [ |l]]] Heq1; try discriminate; case_eq (get_atom hb); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | |B] x' y' Heq2; try discriminate; rewrite !andb_true_iff, orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec, !Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 [[H2 H3]|[H2 H3]]]; subst B x' y'; exists ha, hb, A, x, y; auto.
+ case (get_form f1); try discriminate; intro ha; case (get_form f2); try discriminate; intro hb; case_eq (get_atom ha); try discriminate; intros [A] [ |x [ |y [ |l]]] Heq1; try discriminate; case_eq (get_atom hb); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | |B | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] x' y' Heq2; try discriminate; rewrite !andb_true_iff, orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec, !Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 [[H2 H3]|[H2 H3]]]; subst B x' y'; exists ha, hb, A, x, y; auto.
intros [ha [hb [A [x [y [H1 [H2 [H3 [H4|H4]]]]]]]]]; rewrite H1, H2, H3, H4, Typ.eqb_refl, !eqb_refl; auto; rewrite orb_true_r; auto.
Qed.
Section Valid1.
- Variables (t_i : array typ_eqb)
+ Variables (t_i : array SMT_classes.typ_compdec)
(t_func : array (Atom.tval t_i))
(ch_atom : Atom.check_atom t_atom)
(ch_form : Form.check_form t_form)
@@ -261,8 +262,10 @@ Section Operators.
Local Notation interp_form_hatom :=
(Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom).
+ Local Notation interp_form_hatom_bv :=
+ (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom).
Local Notation rho :=
- (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom t_form).
+ (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form).
Let wf_t_atom : Atom.wf t_atom.
Proof. destruct (Atom.check_atom_correct _ ch_atom); auto. Qed.
@@ -271,10 +274,10 @@ Section Operators.
Proof. destruct (Atom.check_atom_correct _ ch_atom); auto. Qed.
Lemma default_t_form : default t_form = Ftrue.
- Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom _ ch_form) as [[H _] _]; auto. Qed.
+ Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv _ ch_form) as [[H _] _]; auto. Qed.
Lemma wf_t_form : wf t_form.
- Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom _ ch_form) as [[_ H] _]; auto. Qed.
+ Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv _ ch_form) as [[_ H] _]; auto. Qed.
Local Hint Immediate wf_t_atom default_t_atom default_t_form wf_t_form.
@@ -354,7 +357,7 @@ Section Operators.
| _, _ => false
end.
- Variables (t_i : array typ_eqb)
+ Variables (t_i : array SMT_classes.typ_compdec)
(t_func : array (Atom.tval t_i))
(ch_atom : Atom.check_atom t_atom)
(ch_form : Form.check_form t_form)
@@ -362,8 +365,10 @@ Section Operators.
Local Notation interp_form_hatom :=
(Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom).
+ Local Notation interp_form_hatom_bv :=
+ (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom).
Local Notation rho :=
- (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom t_form).
+ (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form).
Hypothesis interp_check_var : forall x y,
check_var x y -> Var.interp rho x = Var.interp rho y.
@@ -395,9 +400,9 @@ Section Operators.
Lemma interp_check_form_aux : forall a b,
check_form_aux a b ->
- Form.interp interp_form_hatom t_form a = Form.interp interp_form_hatom t_form b.
+ Form.interp interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form a = Form.interp interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form b.
Proof.
- intros [a| | |i1 l1|a1|a1|a1|l1 l2|l1 l2|l1 l2 l3] [b| | |j1 m1|a2|a2|a2|j1 j2|j1 j2|j1 j2 j3]; simpl; try discriminate;auto.
+ intros [a| | |i1 l1|a1|a1|a1|l1 l2|l1 l2|l1 l2 l3|a l1] [b| | |j1 m1|a2|a2|a2|j1 j2|j1 j2|j1 j2 j3|b m1]; simpl; try discriminate;auto.
(* Atom *)
unfold is_true; rewrite Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intro; subst a; auto.
(* Interesting case *)
@@ -485,7 +490,7 @@ Section Operators.
Section Valid.
- Variables (t_i : array typ_eqb)
+ Variables (t_i : array SMT_classes.typ_compdec)
(t_func : array (Atom.tval t_i))
(ch_atom : Atom.check_atom t_atom)
(ch_form : Form.check_form t_form)
@@ -493,18 +498,20 @@ Section Operators.
Local Notation interp_form_hatom :=
(Atom.interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom).
+ Local Notation interp_form_hatom_bv :=
+ (Atom.interp_form_hatom_bv t_i t_func t_atom).
Local Notation rho :=
- (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom t_form).
+ (Form.interp_state_var interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form).
Let wf_rho : Valuation.wf rho.
- Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom _ ch_form); auto. Qed.
+ Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv _ ch_form); auto. Qed.
Let default_t_form : default t_form = Ftrue.
- Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom _ ch_form) as [[H _] _]; auto. Qed.
+ Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv _ ch_form) as [[H _] _]; auto. Qed.
Let wf_t_form : wf t_form.
- Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom _ ch_form) as [[_ H] _]; auto. Qed.
+ Proof. destruct (Form.check_form_correct interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv _ ch_form) as [[_ H] _]; auto. Qed.
Local Hint Immediate wf_rho default_t_form wf_t_form.
@@ -522,7 +529,7 @@ Section Operators.
Lemma interp_check_form : forall a b,
check_form a b ->
- Form.interp interp_form_hatom t_form a = Form.interp interp_form_hatom t_form b.
+ Form.interp interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form a = Form.interp interp_form_hatom interp_form_hatom_bv t_form b.
Proof. apply interp_check_form_aux, interp_check_hform; auto. Qed.
@@ -547,3 +554,11 @@ Section Operators.
End Valid.
End Operators.
+
+
+
+(*
+ Local Variables:
+ coq-load-path: ((rec ".." "SMTCoq"))
+ End:
+*)
diff --git a/src/spl/Syntactic.v b/src/spl/Syntactic.v
index 7a52694..cc34522 100644
--- a/src/spl/Syntactic.v
+++ b/src/spl/Syntactic.v
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
(**************************************************************************)
(* *)
(* SMTCoq *)
-(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2016 *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
(* *)
-(* Michaël Armand *)
-(* Benjamin Grégoire *)
-(* Chantal Keller *)
-(* *)
-(* Inria - École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Sud *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
(* *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
(* *)
@@ -15,9 +11,9 @@
(*** Spl -- a small checker for simplifications ***)
-
Require Import List PArray Bool Int63 ZMicromega.
-Require Import Misc State SMT_terms.
+Require Import Misc State SMT_terms BVList.
+Require Lia.
Local Open Scope array_scope.
Local Open Scope int63_scope.
@@ -29,7 +25,7 @@ Section CheckAtom.
Import Atom.
- Variable t_i : PArray.array typ_eqb.
+ Variable t_i : PArray.array SMT_classes.typ_compdec.
Variable t_func : PArray.array (tval t_i).
Variable t_atom : PArray.array atom.
@@ -73,6 +69,8 @@ Section CheckAtom.
Typ.eqb t1 t2 &&
((check_hatom a1 b1 && check_hatom a2 b2) ||
(check_hatom a1 b2 && check_hatom a2 b1))
+ | BO_BVand s1, BO_BVand s2
+ | BO_BVor s1, BO_BVor s2 => N.eqb s1 s2 && check_hatom a1 b1 && check_hatom a2 b2
| _, _ => false
end
| Anop o1 l1, Anop o2 l2 =>
@@ -112,16 +110,62 @@ Section CheckAtom.
Lemma check_atom_aux_correct : forall a1 a2, check_atom_aux a1 a2 ->
interp t_i t_func t_atom a1 = interp t_i t_func t_atom a2.
Proof.
- intros [op1|op1 i1|op1 i1 j1|op1 li1|f1 args1]; simpl.
+ intros [op1|op1 i1|op1 i1 j1|op1 li1|op1 li1|f1 args1]; simpl.
(* Constants *)
- intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; pose (H:=reflect_cop_eqb op1 op2); inversion H; try discriminate; subst op1; auto.
+ - intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; pose (H:=reflect_cop_eqb op1 op2); inversion H; try discriminate; subst op1; auto.
(* Unary operators *)
- intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; try (case op1; discriminate).
+ -
+ intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; try (case op1; discriminate).
case op1; case op2; try discriminate; try (unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [_ H]; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H); auto).
- case_eq (get_atom i2); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | ] i Heq H; try discriminate; simpl; unfold apply_unop; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H); unfold interp_hatom; rewrite (t_interp_wf _ _ _ Hwf Hd i2), Heq; simpl; unfold apply_unop; destruct (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom .[ i]) as [A v]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.Tpositive) as [k| ]; auto.
- case_eq (get_atom i1); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | ] i Heq H; try discriminate; simpl; unfold apply_unop; rewrite <- (check_hatom_correct _ _ H); unfold interp_hatom; rewrite (t_interp_wf _ _ _ Hwf Hd i1), Heq; simpl; unfold apply_unop; destruct (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom .[ i]) as [A v]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.Tpositive) as [k| ]; auto.
- (* Binary operators *)
- intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; case op1; case op2; try discriminate; try (unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2); auto).
+
+ case_eq (get_atom i2); try discriminate;
+ intros [ | | | | | | | | i0 n0 n1| n i0| n i0] i Heq H; try discriminate; simpl;
+ unfold apply_unop; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H);
+ unfold interp_hatom; rewrite (t_interp_wf _ _ _ Hwf Hd i2), Heq; simpl;
+ unfold apply_unop; destruct (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom .[ i]) as [A v];
+ destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.Tpositive) as [k| ]; auto.
+ case_eq (get_atom i1); try discriminate;
+ intros [ | | | | | | | | i0 n0 n1| n i0| n i0] i Heq H; try discriminate; simpl;
+ unfold apply_unop. rewrite <- (check_hatom_correct _ _ H);
+ unfold interp_hatom; rewrite (t_interp_wf _ _ _ Hwf Hd i1), Heq; simpl;
+ unfold apply_unop; destruct (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom .[ i]) as [A v];
+ destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.Tpositive) as [k| ]; auto.
+
+ intros n m n1 m2. simpl. unfold is_true. rewrite !andb_true_iff, beq_nat_true_iff, N.eqb_eq. intros [[-> ->] H]. rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H); auto.
+ intros n m. simpl. unfold is_true. rewrite andb_true_iff, N.eqb_eq. intros [-> H]. rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H); auto.
+ intros n m. simpl. unfold is_true. rewrite andb_true_iff, N.eqb_eq. intros [-> H]. rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H); auto.
+ (* bv_extr *)
+ intros i n0 n1 i0 n2 n3.
+ unfold is_true. rewrite andb_true_iff.
+ intros. destruct H as (Ha, Hb).
+ inversion Ha.
+ rewrite !andb_true_iff in H0.
+ destruct H0 as ((H0a, H0b), H0c).
+ rewrite N.eqb_eq in H0a, H0b, H0c.
+ subst.
+ rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ Hb); auto.
+ (* bv_zextn *)
+ intros n i n0 i0.
+ unfold is_true. rewrite andb_true_iff.
+ intros. destruct H as (Ha, Hb).
+ inversion Ha.
+ rewrite !andb_true_iff in H0.
+ destruct H0 as (H0a, H0b).
+ rewrite N.eqb_eq in H0a, H0b.
+ subst.
+ rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ Hb); auto.
+ (* bv_sextn *)
+ intros n i n0 i0.
+ unfold is_true. rewrite andb_true_iff.
+ intros. destruct H as (Ha, Hb).
+ inversion Ha.
+ rewrite !andb_true_iff in H0.
+ destruct H0 as (H0a, H0b).
+ rewrite N.eqb_eq in H0a, H0b.
+ subst.
+ rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ Hb); auto.
+ (* Binary operators *)
+ - intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; case op1; case op2; try discriminate; try (unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2); auto).
unfold is_true, interp_bop, apply_binop. rewrite orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff. intros [[H1 H2]|[H1 H2]]; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2); destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom i2) as [A v1]; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom j2) as [B v2]; destruct (Typ.cast B Typ.TZ) as [k2| ]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.TZ) as [k1| ]; auto; rewrite Z.add_comm; reflexivity.
unfold is_true, interp_bop, apply_binop. rewrite orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff. intros [[H1 H2]|[H1 H2]]; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2); destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom i2) as [A v1]; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom j2) as [B v2]; destruct (Typ.cast B Typ.TZ) as [k2| ]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.TZ) as [k1| ]; auto; rewrite Z.mul_comm; reflexivity.
unfold interp_bop, apply_binop; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom j2) as [B v2]; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom i2) as [A v1]; destruct (Typ.cast B Typ.TZ) as [k2| ]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.TZ) as [k1| ]; auto; rewrite Z.gtb_ltb; auto.
@@ -129,10 +173,18 @@ Section CheckAtom.
unfold interp_bop, apply_binop; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom j2) as [B v2]; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom i2) as [A v1]; destruct (Typ.cast B Typ.TZ) as [k2| ]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.TZ) as [k1| ]; auto; rewrite Z.geb_leb; auto.
unfold interp_bop, apply_binop; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom j2) as [B v2]; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom i2) as [A v1]; destruct (Typ.cast B Typ.TZ) as [k2| ]; destruct (Typ.cast A Typ.TZ) as [k1| ]; auto; rewrite Z.gtb_ltb; auto.
intros A B; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, orb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb B A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb B A)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intros [H2 [H1|H1]]; subst B; rewrite andb_true_iff in H1; destruct H1 as [H1 H2]; rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2); auto; simpl; unfold apply_binop; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom j2) as [B v1]; destruct (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom i2) as [C v2]; destruct (Typ.cast B A) as [k1| ]; destruct (Typ.cast C A) as [k2| ]; auto; rewrite Typ.i_eqb_sym; auto.
+ intros s1 s2; unfold is_true; rewrite !andb_true_iff, N.eqb_eq;
+ intros [[-> H1] H2];
+ now rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2).
+ intros s1 s2; unfold is_true; rewrite !andb_true_iff, N.eqb_eq;
+ intros [[-> H1] H2];
+ now rewrite (check_hatom_correct _ _ H1), (check_hatom_correct _ _ H2).
+ (* Ternary operators *)
+ - intros. now contradict H.
(* N-ary operators *)
- intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; destruct op1 as [t1]; destruct op2 as [t2]; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb t1 t2 = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb t1 t2)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; subst t2; rewrite (list_beq_compute_interp _ _ _ H2); auto.
+ - intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; destruct op1 as [t1]; destruct op2 as [t2]; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb t1 t2 = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb t1 t2)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; subst t2; rewrite (list_beq_compute_interp _ _ _ H2); auto.
(* Application *)
- intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H2 H1]; subst f2; rewrite (list_beq_correct _ _ H1); auto.
+ - intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H2 H1]; subst f2; rewrite (list_beq_correct _ _ H1); auto.
Qed.
End AUX.
@@ -233,7 +285,10 @@ Section CheckAtom.
forall h1 h2, check_neg_hatom h1 h2 ->
interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h1 = negb (interp_form_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h2).
Proof.
- unfold interp_form_hatom. intros Hwt H1 H2 h1 h2 H3. unfold interp_bool. generalize (check_neg_hatom_correct Hwt H1 H2 _ _ H3). case (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h1). case (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h2). simpl. intros [i| | | ] v1 [j| | | ] v2; intro H; inversion H. rewrite Typ.cast_refl. auto.
+ unfold interp_form_hatom. intros Hwt H1 H2 h1 h2 H3. unfold interp_bool. generalize (check_neg_hatom_correct Hwt H1 H2 _ _ H3).
+ case (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h1).
+ case (interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h2).
+ simpl. intros [ |i| | | | ] v1 [ |j| | | | ] v2; intro H; inversion H. rewrite Typ.cast_refl. auto.
Qed.
End CheckAtom.
@@ -344,6 +399,7 @@ Section FLATTEN.
(** Correctness proofs *)
Variable interp_atom : atom -> bool.
+ Variable interp_bvatom : atom -> forall s, BITVECTOR_LIST.bitvector s.
Hypothesis default_thf : default t_form = Ftrue.
Hypothesis wf_thf : wf t_form.
Hypothesis check_atom_correct :
@@ -351,10 +407,10 @@ Section FLATTEN.
Hypothesis check_neg_atom_correct :
forall a1 a2, check_neg_atom a1 a2 -> interp_atom a1 = negb (interp_atom a2).
- Local Notation interp_var := (interp_state_var interp_atom t_form).
+ Local Notation interp_var := (interp_state_var interp_atom interp_bvatom t_form).
Local Notation interp_lit := (Lit.interp interp_var).
- Lemma interp_Fnot2 : forall i l, interp interp_atom t_form (Fnot2 i l) = interp_lit l.
+ Lemma interp_Fnot2 : forall i l, interp interp_atom interp_bvatom t_form (Fnot2 i l) = interp_lit l.
Proof.
intros i l;simpl;apply fold_ind;trivial.
intros a;rewrite negb_involutive;trivial.
@@ -366,14 +422,14 @@ Section FLATTEN.
unfold remove_not;intros l.
case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit l));intros;trivial.
unfold Lit.interp, Var.interp.
- rewrite (wf_interp_form interp_atom t_form default_thf wf_thf (Lit.blit l)), H, interp_Fnot2.
+ rewrite (wf_interp_form interp_atom interp_bvatom t_form default_thf wf_thf (Lit.blit l)), H, interp_Fnot2.
destruct(Lit.is_pos l);trivial.
rewrite Lit.is_pos_neg, Lit.blit_neg;unfold Lit.interp;destruct (Lit.is_pos i0);trivial.
rewrite negb_involutive;trivial.
Qed.
Lemma get_and_correct : forall l args, get_and l = Some args ->
- interp_lit l = interp interp_atom t_form (Fand args).
+ interp_lit l = interp interp_atom interp_bvatom t_form (Fand args).
Proof.
unfold get_and;intros l args.
rewrite <- remove_not_correct;unfold Lit.interp;generalize (remove_not l).
@@ -384,7 +440,7 @@ Section FLATTEN.
Qed.
Lemma get_or_correct : forall l args, get_or l = Some args ->
- interp_lit l = interp interp_atom t_form (For args).
+ interp_lit l = interp interp_atom interp_bvatom t_form (For args).
Proof.
unfold get_or;intros l args.
rewrite <- remove_not_correct;unfold Lit.interp;generalize (remove_not l).
@@ -527,3 +583,9 @@ Section FLATTEN.
Qed.
End FLATTEN.
+
+(*
+ Local Variables:
+ coq-load-path: ((rec ".." "SMTCoq"))
+ End:
+*)