aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/spl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorvblot <24938579+vblot@users.noreply.github.com>2021-07-07 08:55:25 +0200
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2021-07-07 08:55:25 +0200
commite2683e1e653a1b6872a886f4b99218e2803f7a74 (patch)
treee5058272d1f912065fd22d41d45d0e93a8c7c5ab /src/spl
parent6a209bbc1bf5c90adb5f576093129fc62ce84780 (diff)
downloadsmtcoq-e2683e1e653a1b6872a886f4b99218e2803f7a74.tar.gz
smtcoq-e2683e1e653a1b6872a886f4b99218e2803f7a74.zip
use native integers (#96)
Diffstat (limited to 'src/spl')
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Assumptions.v2
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Operators.v84
-rw-r--r--src/spl/Syntactic.v79
3 files changed, 83 insertions, 82 deletions
diff --git a/src/spl/Assumptions.v b/src/spl/Assumptions.v
index 32ab634..e3aa767 100644
--- a/src/spl/Assumptions.v
+++ b/src/spl/Assumptions.v
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Section Checker_correct.
Proof.
induction c1 as [ |l1 c1 IHc1]; simpl; intros [ |l2 c2]; simpl; auto; try discriminate.
unfold is_true. rewrite andb_true_iff. intros [H1 H2].
- rewrite Int63Properties.eqb_spec in H1. now rewrite (IHc1 _ H2), H1.
+ rewrite Int63.eqb_spec in H1. now rewrite (IHc1 _ H2), H1.
Qed.
Lemma valid_check_clause cid c :
diff --git a/src/spl/Operators.v b/src/spl/Operators.v
index 966cbcb..7fa0a0c 100644
--- a/src/spl/Operators.v
+++ b/src/spl/Operators.v
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Section Operators.
Fixpoint check_diseqs_complete_aux a dist t :=
match dist with
| nil => true
- | b::q => if PArray.existsb (fun (x:option (int*int)) =>
+ | b::q => if aexistsbi (fun _ (x:option (int*int)) =>
match x with
| Some (a',b') => ((a == a') && (b == b')) || ((a == b') && (b == a'))
| None => false
@@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ Section Operators.
Proof.
intros a dist t; induction dist as [ |b q IHq]; simpl; split; auto.
intros _ y H; inversion H.
- case_eq (PArray.existsb (fun x : option (int * int) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t); try discriminate; rewrite PArray.existsb_spec; intros [i [H1 H2]]; rewrite IHq; clear IHq; intros H3 y [H4|H4]; auto; subst y; exists i; split; auto; generalize H2; case (t .[ i]); try discriminate; intros [a' b']; rewrite orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff, !Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [[H4 H5]|[H4 H5]]; subst a' b'; auto.
- intro H1; case_eq (PArray.existsb (fun x : option (int * int) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t).
+ case_eq (aexistsbi (fun _ (x : option (int * int)) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t); try discriminate; rewrite aexistsbi_spec; intros [i [H1 H2]]; rewrite IHq; clear IHq; intros H3 y [H4|H4]; auto; subst y; exists i; split; auto; generalize H2; case (t .[ i]); try discriminate; intros [a' b']; rewrite orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff, !Int63.eqb_spec; intros [[H4 H5]|[H4 H5]]; subst a' b'; auto.
+ intro H1; case_eq (aexistsbi (fun _ (x : option (int * int)) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t).
intros _; rewrite IHq; clear IHq; intros y Hy; apply H1; auto.
- rewrite array_existsb_false_spec; destruct (H1 b (or_introl (refl_equal b))) as [i [H2 H3]]; intro H; rewrite <- (H _ H2); destruct H3 as [H3|H3]; rewrite H3; rewrite !eqb_refl; auto; rewrite orb_true_r; auto.
+ rewrite aexistsbi_false_spec; destruct (H1 b (or_introl (refl_equal b))) as [i [H2 H3]]; intro H; rewrite <- (H _ H2); destruct H3 as [H3|H3]; rewrite H3; rewrite !eqb_refl; auto; rewrite orb_true_r; auto.
Qed.
@@ -82,10 +82,10 @@ Section Operators.
Proof.
intros a dist t; induction dist as [ |b q IHq]; simpl; split; try discriminate.
intros [y [H _]]; elim H.
- case_eq (PArray.existsb (fun x : option (int * int) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t).
+ case_eq (aexistsbi (fun _ (x : option (int * int)) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t).
intros _; rewrite IHq; clear IHq; intros [y [H3 H4]]; exists y; auto.
- rewrite array_existsb_false_spec; intros H _; exists b; split; auto; intros i Hi; split; intro H1; generalize (H _ Hi); rewrite H1, !eqb_refl; try discriminate; rewrite orb_true_r; discriminate.
- intros [y [H1 H2]]; case_eq (PArray.existsb (fun x : option (int * int) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t); auto; rewrite PArray.existsb_spec; intros [i [H3 H4]]; rewrite IHq; clear IHq; exists y; destruct H1 as [H1|H1]; auto; subst y; case_eq (t.[i]); [intros [a' b'] Heq|intro Heq]; rewrite Heq in H4; try discriminate; rewrite orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff, !eqb_spec in H4; destruct H4 as [[H4 H5]|[H4 H5]]; subst a' b'; generalize (H2 _ H3); rewrite Heq; intros [H4 H5]; [elim H4|elim H5]; auto.
+ rewrite aexistsbi_false_spec; intros H _; exists b; split; auto; intros i Hi; split; intro H1; generalize (H _ Hi); rewrite H1, !eqb_refl; try discriminate; rewrite orb_true_r; discriminate.
+ intros [y [H1 H2]]; case_eq (aexistsbi (fun _ (x : option (int * int)) => match x with | Some (a', b') => (a == a') && (b == b') || (a == b') && (b == a') | None => false end) t); auto; rewrite aexistsbi_spec; intros [i [H3 H4]]; rewrite IHq; clear IHq; exists y; destruct H1 as [H1|H1]; auto; subst y; case_eq (t.[i]); [intros [a' b'] Heq|intro Heq]; rewrite Heq in H4; try discriminate; rewrite orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff, !eqb_spec in H4; destruct H4 as [[H4 H5]|[H4 H5]]; subst a' b'; generalize (H2 _ H3); rewrite Heq; intros [H4 H5]; [elim H4|elim H5]; auto.
Qed.
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Section Operators.
Definition check_diseqs ty dist diseq :=
- let t := PArray.mapi (fun _ t =>
+ let t := amap (fun t =>
if Lit.is_pos t then None else
match get_form (Lit.blit t) with
| Fatom a =>
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Section Operators.
| _ => None
end
) diseq in
- PArray.forallb (fun x => match x with | None => false | _ => true end) t &&
+ aforallbi (fun _ x => match x with | None => false | _ => true end) t &&
check_diseqs_complete dist t.
@@ -166,17 +166,17 @@ Section Operators.
get_atom a = Atom.Abop (Atom.BO_eq A) y x))).
Proof.
intros A dist diseq; unfold check_diseqs; rewrite andb_true_iff,
- PArray.forallb_spec, check_diseqs_complete_spec, length_mapi; split; intros [H1 H2]; split.
- clear H2; intros i Hi; generalize (H1 _ Hi); rewrite get_mapi;
+ aforallbi_spec, check_diseqs_complete_spec, length_amap; split; intros [H1 H2]; split.
+ clear H2; intros i Hi; generalize (H1 _ Hi); rewrite get_amap;
auto; case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); try discriminate; intro Heq1; case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit (diseq .[ i])));
try discriminate; intros a Heq2; case_eq (get_atom a); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | | B | | | | | | | | | | | | ]; try discriminate; intros h1 h2 Heq3; case_eq (Typ.eqb A B); try discriminate; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intro; subst B; case_eq (h1 == h2); try discriminate; rewrite eqb_false_spec; intro H2; case_eq (check_in h1 dist); try discriminate; case_eq (check_in h2 dist); try discriminate; rewrite !check_in_spec; intros H3 H4 _; split; try discriminate; exists a; split; auto; exists h1, h2; repeat split; auto; rewrite <- In2_In; auto.
- clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 H4]]; clear H2; rewrite get_mapi in H4; auto; exists i; split; auto; generalize H4;
+ clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 H4]]; clear H2; rewrite get_amap in H4; auto; exists i; split; auto; generalize H4;
case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); intro Heq; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (get_form (Lit.blit (diseq .[ i]))); [intros a| | |intros a1 a2|intros a1|intros a1|intros a1|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2| intros a1 a2 a3|intros a ls]; intro Heq2; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case_eq (get_atom a); [intros a1|intros a1 a2|intros [ | | | | | | | B | | | | | | | | | | | | ] h1 h2|intros a1 a2|intros a1 a2 | intros a1 a2]; intro Heq3; try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); try (case_eq (Typ.eqb A B); try (intros _ [H|H]; discriminate); change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intro; subst B; case_eq (h1 == h2); try (intros _ [H|H]; discriminate); rewrite eqb_false_spec; intro H10; case (check_in h1 dist); try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); case (check_in h2 dist); try (intros [H|H]; discriminate); simpl; intro H3; split; try discriminate; exists a; split; auto; destruct H3 as [H3|H3]; inversion H3; subst; auto).
intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
- clear H2; intros i Hi; rewrite get_mapi; auto; destruct (H1 _ Hi) as [H2 [a [H3 [h1 [h2 [H4 [H5 H6]]]]]]]; clear H1; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto); rewrite H3, H4, Typ.eqb_refl; simpl; replace (h1 == h2) with false by (case_eq (h1 == h2); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; intro H; elim H5; auto); simpl; rewrite <- In2_In, <- !check_in_spec in H6; auto; destruct H6 as [H6 H7]; rewrite H6, H7; auto.
- clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 [H3 [a [H4 [H6 H5]]]]]]; clear H2; exists i; split; auto; rewrite get_mapi; auto; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto); rewrite H4; assert (H7 := or_introl (In2 y x dist) Hxy); rewrite <- In2_In, <- !check_in_spec in H7; auto; destruct H7 as [H7 H8]; destruct H5 as [H5|H5]; rewrite H5, Typ.eqb_refl; [replace (x == y) with false by (case_eq (x == y); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; auto)|replace (y == x) with false by (case_eq (y == x); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; auto)]; simpl; rewrite H7, H8; auto.
+ clear H2; intros i Hi; rewrite get_amap; auto; destruct (H1 _ Hi) as [H2 [a [H3 [h1 [h2 [H4 [H5 H6]]]]]]]; clear H1; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto); rewrite H3, H4, Typ.eqb_refl; simpl; replace (h1 == h2) with false by (case_eq (h1 == h2); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; intro H; elim H5; auto); simpl; rewrite <- In2_In, <- !check_in_spec in H6; auto; destruct H6 as [H6 H7]; rewrite H6, H7; auto.
+ clear H1; intros x y Hxy; destruct (H2 _ _ Hxy) as [i [H1 [H3 [a [H4 [H6 H5]]]]]]; clear H2; exists i; split; auto; rewrite get_amap; auto; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto); rewrite H4; assert (H7 := or_introl (In2 y x dist) Hxy); rewrite <- In2_In, <- !check_in_spec in H7; auto; destruct H7 as [H7 H8]; destruct H5 as [H5|H5]; rewrite H5, Typ.eqb_refl; [replace (x == y) with false by (case_eq (x == y); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; auto)|replace (y == x) with false by (case_eq (y == x); auto; rewrite eqb_spec; auto)]; simpl; rewrite H7, H8; auto.
Qed.
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
get_atom hb = Atom.Abop (Atom.BO_eq ty) y x).
Proof.
intros f1 f2; unfold check_distinct_two_args; split.
- case (get_form f1); try discriminate; intro ha; case (get_form f2); try discriminate; intro hb; case_eq (get_atom ha); try discriminate; intros [A] [ |x [ |y [ |l]]] Heq1; try discriminate; case_eq (get_atom hb); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | |B | | | | | | | | | | | | ] x' y' Heq2; try discriminate; rewrite !andb_true_iff, orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec, !Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 [[H2 H3]|[H2 H3]]]; subst B x' y'; exists ha, hb, A, x, y; auto.
+ case (get_form f1); try discriminate; intro ha; case (get_form f2); try discriminate; intro hb; case_eq (get_atom ha); try discriminate; intros [A] [ |x [ |y [ |l]]] Heq1; try discriminate; case_eq (get_atom hb); try discriminate; intros [ | | | | | | |B | | | | | | | | | | | | ] x' y' Heq2; try discriminate; rewrite !andb_true_iff, orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb A B = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb A B)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec, !Int63.eqb_spec; intros [H1 [[H2 H3]|[H2 H3]]]; subst B x' y'; exists ha, hb, A, x, y; auto.
intros [ha [hb [A [x [y [H1 [H2 [H3 [H4|H4]]]]]]]]]; rewrite H1, H2, H3, H4, Typ.eqb_refl, !eqb_refl; auto; rewrite orb_true_r; auto.
Qed.
@@ -283,24 +283,24 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
Lemma interp_check_distinct : forall ha diseq,
check_distinct ha diseq = true ->
- interp_form_hatom ha = afold_left bool int true andb (Lit.interp rho) diseq.
+ interp_form_hatom ha = afold_left bool true andb (amap (Lit.interp rho) diseq).
Proof.
intros ha diseq; rewrite check_distinct_spec; intros [A [dist [H1 H2]]]; rewrite check_diseqs_spec in H2; destruct H2 as [H2 H3]; unfold Atom.interp_form_hatom, Atom.interp_bool, Atom.interp_hatom; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op; rewrite H1; simpl; generalize (Atom.compute_interp_spec_rev t_i (get (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom)) A dist); case (Atom.compute_interp t_i (get (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom)) A nil); simpl.
intros l H4; case_eq (distinct (Typ.i_eqb t_i A) (rev l)).
- rewrite distinct_spec; intro H5; symmetry; apply afold_left_andb_true; intros i Hi; destruct (H2 _ Hi) as [H9 [a [H10 [h1 [h2 [H6 [H7 H8]]]]]]]; unfold Lit.interp; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core); unfold Var.interp; rewrite Form.wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H10; simpl; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H6; simpl; unfold Atom.apply_binop; unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite forallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; assert (H11: a < length t_atom).
+ rewrite distinct_spec; intro H5; symmetry; apply afold_left_andb_true; rewrite length_amap; intros i Hi; rewrite get_amap by exact Hi; destruct (H2 _ Hi) as [H9 [a [H10 [h1 [h2 [H6 [H7 H8]]]]]]]; unfold Lit.interp; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core); unfold Var.interp; rewrite Form.wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H10; simpl; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H6; simpl; unfold Atom.apply_binop; unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite aforallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; assert (H11: a < length t_atom).
case_eq (a < length t_atom); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro H11; rewrite (get_outofbound _ _ _ H11) in H6; rewrite default_t_atom in H6; inversion H6.
generalize (wt_t_atom _ H11); rewrite H6; simpl; rewrite !andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) h1) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) h1) A)); change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) h2) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) h2) A)); rewrite !Typ.eqb_spec; intros [[_ H13] H12]; generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom h1); rewrite H13; intros [v1 HH1]; generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom h2); rewrite H12; intros [v2 HH2]; rewrite HH1, HH2; simpl; rewrite Typ.cast_refl; simpl; destruct H8 as [H8|H8]; [ |rewrite Typ.i_eqb_sym]; rewrite H5; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H4; [exists h2; exists h1|exists h1; exists h2]; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
- rewrite distinct_false_spec; intros [v2 [v1 [H5 H6]]]; rewrite H4 in H5; destruct H5 as [a [b [H5 [H7 H8]]]]; clear H4; change (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v2 v1 = true) with (is_true (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v2 v1)) in H6; rewrite Typ.i_eqb_spec in H6; subst v2; clear H2; destruct (H3 _ _ H5) as [i [H2 [H4 [hb [H6 [H9 H10]]]]]]; clear H3; symmetry; apply (afold_left_andb_false _ i); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; unfold Lit.interp; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core); unfold Var.interp; rewrite Form.wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H6; simpl; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; destruct H10 as [H10|H10]; rewrite H10; simpl; rewrite H7, H8; simpl; rewrite Typ.cast_refl; simpl; replace (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v1 v1) with true; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; symmetry; change (is_true (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v1 v1)); rewrite Typ.i_eqb_spec; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
+ rewrite distinct_false_spec; intros [v2 [v1 [H5 H6]]]; rewrite H4 in H5; destruct H5 as [a [b [H5 [H7 H8]]]]; clear H4; change (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v2 v1 = true) with (is_true (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v2 v1)) in H6; rewrite Typ.i_eqb_spec in H6; subst v2; clear H2; destruct (H3 _ _ H5) as [i [H2 [H4 [hb [H6 [H9 H10]]]]]]; clear H3; symmetry; apply (afold_left_andb_false i); rewrite ?length_amap; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite get_amap by assumption; unfold Lit.interp; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core); unfold Var.interp; rewrite Form.wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H6; simpl; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; destruct H10 as [H10|H10]; rewrite H10; simpl; rewrite H7, H8; simpl; rewrite Typ.cast_refl; simpl; replace (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v1 v1) with true; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; symmetry; change (is_true (Typ.i_eqb t_i A v1 v1)); rewrite Typ.i_eqb_spec; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
intros [a [H20 H21]]; assert (H4: ha < length t_atom).
case_eq (ha < length t_atom); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H1; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_atom; discriminate.
- unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite forallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; generalize (wt_t_atom _ H4); rewrite H1; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff, forallb_forall; intros [_ H5]; assert (H6 := H5 _ H20); generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom a); intros [va Ha]; rewrite Ha in H21; simpl in H21; elim H21; apply Typ.eqb_spec; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
+ unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite aforallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; generalize (wt_t_atom _ H4); rewrite H1; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff, forallb_forall; intros [_ H5]; assert (H6 := H5 _ H20); generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom a); intros [va Ha]; rewrite Ha in H21; simpl in H21; elim H21; apply Typ.eqb_spec; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
Qed.
Lemma interp_check_distinct_two_args : forall f1 f2,
check_distinct_two_args f1 f2 = true ->
rho f1 = negb (rho f2).
Proof.
- intros f1 f2; rewrite check_distinct_two_args_spec; intros [ha [hb [A [x [y [H1 [H2 [H3 [H4|H4]]]]]]]]]; unfold Form.interp_state_var; assert (H5: f1 < length t_form) by (case_eq (f1 < length t_form); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H1; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_form; discriminate); assert (H6: f2 < length t_form) by (case_eq (f2 < length t_form); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H2; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_form; discriminate); rewrite !Form.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H1, H2; simpl; unfold Atom.interp_form_hatom, Atom.interp_hatom; rewrite !Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H3, H4; simpl; unfold Atom.wt,is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite forallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; assert (H7: hb < length t_atom) by (case_eq (hb < length t_atom); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H4; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_atom; discriminate); generalize (wt_t_atom _ H7); rewrite H4; simpl; case (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) hb); try discriminate; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) x) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) x) A)); change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) y) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) y) A)); rewrite !Typ.eqb_spec; intros [H8 H9]; generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom x), (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom y); rewrite H8, H9; intros [v1 HH1] [v2 HH2]; rewrite HH1, HH2; simpl; rewrite Typ.cast_refl; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite Typ.i_eqb_sym; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
+ intros f1 f2; rewrite check_distinct_two_args_spec; intros [ha [hb [A [x [y [H1 [H2 [H3 [H4|H4]]]]]]]]]; unfold Form.interp_state_var; assert (H5: f1 < length t_form) by (case_eq (f1 < length t_form); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H1; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_form; discriminate); assert (H6: f2 < length t_form) by (case_eq (f2 < length t_form); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H2; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_form; discriminate); rewrite !Form.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H1, H2; simpl; unfold Atom.interp_form_hatom, Atom.interp_hatom; rewrite !Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H3, H4; simpl; unfold Atom.wt,is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite aforallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; assert (H7: hb < length t_atom) by (case_eq (hb < length t_atom); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H4; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_atom; discriminate); generalize (wt_t_atom _ H7); rewrite H4; simpl; case (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) hb); try discriminate; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) x) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) x) A)); change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) y) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type' t_i (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) y) A)); rewrite !Typ.eqb_spec; intros [H8 H9]; generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom x), (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom y); rewrite H8, H9; intros [v1 HH1] [v2 HH2]; rewrite HH1, HH2; simpl; rewrite Typ.cast_refl; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite Typ.i_eqb_sym; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core.
Qed.
@@ -309,12 +309,12 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
(* interp_form_hatom ha -> afold_left bool int true andb (Lit.interp rho) diseq. *)
(* Proof. *)
(* intros ha diseq; rewrite check_distinct_spec; intros [A [dist [H1 H]]]; rewrite check_diseqs_spec in H; unfold Atom.interp_form_hatom, Atom.interp_bool, Atom.interp_hatom; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H1; simpl; generalize (Atom.compute_interp_spec_rev t_i (get (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom)) A dist); case (Atom.compute_interp t_i (get (Atom.t_interp t_i t_func t_atom)) A nil); simpl. *)
- (* intros l H2; unfold is_true; rewrite distinct_spec; intro H3; apply afold_left_andb_true; intros i Hi; destruct (H _ Hi) as [H4 [a [H5 [h1 [h2 [H6 [H7 H8]]]]]]]; unfold Lit.interp; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core); unfold Var.interp; rewrite Form.wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H5; simpl; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H6; simpl; unfold Atom.apply_binop; unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite forallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; assert (H10: a < length t_atom). *)
+ (* intros l H2; unfold is_true; rewrite distinct_spec; intro H3; apply afold_left_andb_true; intros i Hi; destruct (H _ Hi) as [H4 [a [H5 [h1 [h2 [H6 [H7 H8]]]]]]]; unfold Lit.interp; replace (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])) with false by (case_eq (Lit.is_pos (diseq .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core); unfold Var.interp; rewrite Form.wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H5; simpl; rewrite Atom.t_interp_wf; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H6; simpl; unfold Atom.apply_binop; unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite aforallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; assert (H10: a < length t_atom). *)
(* case_eq (a < length t_atom); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro H10; rewrite (get_outofbound _ _ _ H10) in H6; rewrite default_t_atom in H6; inversion H6. *)
(* generalize (wt_t_atom _ H10); rewrite H6; simpl; rewrite !andb_true_iff. change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type t_i t_func t_atom h1) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type t_i t_func t_atom h1) A)); change (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type t_i t_func t_atom h2) A = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb (Atom.get_type t_i t_func t_atom h2) A)); rewrite !Typ.eqb_spec; intros [[_ H11] H12]; generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom h1); rewrite H11; intros [v1 HH1]; generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom h2); rewrite H12; intros [v2 HH2]; rewrite HH1, HH2; simpl; rewrite Typ.cast_refl; simpl; destruct H8 as [H8|H8]; [ |rewrite Typ.i_eqb_sym]; rewrite H3; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite H2; [exists h2; exists h1|exists h1; exists h2]; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core. *)
(* intros [a [H2 H3]] _; assert (H4: ha < length t_atom). *)
(* case_eq (ha < length t_atom); auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; intro Heq; generalize H1; rewrite get_outofbound; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core; rewrite default_t_atom; discriminate. *)
- (* unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite forallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; generalize (wt_t_atom _ H4); rewrite H1; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff, forallb_forall; intros [_ H5]; assert (H6 := H5 _ H2); generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom a); intros [va Ha]; rewrite Ha in H3; simpl in H3; elim H3; apply Typ.eqb_spec; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core. *)
+ (* unfold Atom.wt in wt_t_atom; unfold is_true in wt_t_atom; rewrite aforallbi_spec in wt_t_atom; generalize (wt_t_atom _ H4); rewrite H1; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff, forallb_forall; intros [_ H5]; assert (H6 := H5 _ H2); generalize (Atom.check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ wf_t_atom a); intros [va Ha]; rewrite Ha in H3; simpl in H3; elim H3; apply Typ.eqb_spec; auto with smtcoq_spl_op smtcoq_core. *)
(* Qed. *)
End Valid1.
@@ -337,10 +337,10 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
| Ftrue, Ftrue => true
| Ffalse, Ffalse => true
| Fnot2 i1 l1, Fnot2 i2 l2 => (i1 == i2) && (check_lit l1 l2)
- | Fand a1, Fand a2 => (length a1 == length a2) && (forallbi (fun i l => check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1)
- | For a1, For a2 => (length a1 == length a2) && (forallbi (fun i l => check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1)
- | Fimp a1, Fimp a2 => (length a1 == length a2) && (forallbi (fun i l => check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1)
- (* (length a1 == length a2) && (forallbi (fun i l => if i < length a1 - 1 then check_lit (a2.[i]) l else check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1) *)
+ | Fand a1, Fand a2 => (length a1 == length a2) && (aforallbi (fun i l => check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1)
+ | For a1, For a2 => (length a1 == length a2) && (aforallbi (fun i l => check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1)
+ | Fimp a1, Fimp a2 => (length a1 == length a2) && (aforallbi (fun i l => check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1)
+ (* (length a1 == length a2) && (aforallbi (fun i l => if i < length a1 - 1 then check_lit (a2.[i]) l else check_lit l (a2.[i])) a1) *)
| Fxor l1 l2, Fxor j1 j2 => check_lit l1 j1 && check_lit l2 j2
(* check_lit l1 j1 && check_lit j1 l1 && check_lit l2 j2 && check_lit j2 l2 *)
(* (* let a := check_lit l1 j1 in *) *)
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
(* check_lit l1 l2 -> Lit.interp rho l1 -> Lit.interp rho l2 = true. *)
(* Proof. *)
(* unfold check_lit; intros l1 l2; unfold is_true; rewrite !orb_true_iff, !andb_true_iff; intros [[H1|[[H1 H2] H3]]|[[H1 H2] H3]]. *)
- (* rewrite Int63Properties.eqb_spec in H1; subst l1; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
+ (* rewrite Int63.eqb_spec in H1; subst l1; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* unfold Lit.interp; rewrite H1, H2; apply interp_check_var; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* unfold Lit.interp; case_eq (Lit.is_pos l1); intro Heq; rewrite Heq in H1; try discriminate; clear Heq H1; case_eq (Lit.is_pos l2); intro Heq; rewrite Heq in H2; try discriminate; clear Heq H2; case_eq (Var.interp rho (Lit.blit l1)); try discriminate; intros H4 _; case_eq (Var.interp rho (Lit.blit l2)); auto with smtcoq_core; intro H5; rewrite (interp_check_var _ _ H3 H5) in H4; discriminate. *)
(* Qed. *)
@@ -404,17 +404,17 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
Proof.
intros [a| | |i1 l1|a1|a1|a1|l1 l2|l1 l2|l1 l2 l3|a l1] [b| | |j1 m1|a2|a2|a2|j1 j2|j1 j2|j1 j2 j3|b m1]; simpl; try discriminate;auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Atom *)
- unfold is_true; rewrite Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intro; subst a; auto with smtcoq_core.
+ unfold is_true; rewrite Int63.eqb_spec; intro; subst a; auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Interesting case *)
apply interp_check_distinct; auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Double negation *)
- unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; subst j1. rewrite (interp_check_lit _ _ H2). auto with smtcoq_core.
+ unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; subst j1. rewrite (interp_check_lit _ _ H2). auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Conjunction *)
- unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, eqb_spec, forallbi_spec; intros [H1 H2]; apply afold_left_eq; auto with smtcoq_core; intros i Hi; apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core.
+ unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, eqb_spec, aforallbi_spec; intros [H1 H2]; apply afold_left_eq; rewrite ?length_amap; auto with smtcoq_core; intros i Hi; rewrite 2!get_amap by (rewrite <- ?H1; assumption); apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Disjunction *)
- unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, eqb_spec, forallbi_spec; intros [H1 H2]; apply afold_left_eq; auto with smtcoq_core; intros i Hi; apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core.
+ unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, eqb_spec, aforallbi_spec; intros [H1 H2]; apply afold_left_eq; rewrite ?length_amap; auto with smtcoq_core; intros i Hi; rewrite 2!get_amap by (rewrite <- ?H1; assumption); apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Implication *)
- unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, eqb_spec, forallbi_spec; intros [H1 H2]; apply afold_right_eq; auto with smtcoq_core; intros i Hi; apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core.
+ unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, eqb_spec, aforallbi_spec; intros [H1 H2]; apply afold_right_eq; rewrite ?length_amap; auto with smtcoq_core; intros i Hi; rewrite 2!get_amap by (rewrite <- ?H1; assumption); apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Xor *)
unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite (interp_check_lit _ _ H1), (interp_check_lit _ _ H2); auto with smtcoq_core.
(* Iff *)
@@ -444,22 +444,22 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
(* apply interp_check_lit; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* intros a b; case a; try discriminate; intros H _; rewrite H; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* (* Conjunction *) *)
- (* unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite forallbi_spec in H2; intro H3; assert (H4 := afold_left_andb_true_inv _ _ _ H3); clear H3; apply afold_left_andb_true; rewrite <- H1; intros i Hi; eapply interp_check_lit; eauto with smtcoq_core. *)
+ (* unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite aforallbi_spec in H2; intro H3; assert (H4 := afold_left_andb_true_inv _ _ _ H3); clear H3; apply afold_left_andb_true; rewrite <- H1; intros i Hi; eapply interp_check_lit; eauto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* (* Disjunction *) *)
- (* unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite forallbi_spec in H2; intro H3; assert (H4 := afold_left_orb_true_inv _ _ _ H3); clear H3; destruct H4 as [i [H3 H4]]; eapply afold_left_orb_true. *)
+ (* unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite aforallbi_spec in H2; intro H3; assert (H4 := afold_left_orb_true_inv _ _ _ H3); clear H3; destruct H4 as [i [H3 H4]]; eapply afold_left_orb_true. *)
(* rewrite <- H1; eauto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* eapply interp_check_lit; eauto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* (* Implication *) *)
- (* unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite forallbi_spec in H2; intro H3; apply afold_right_implb_true; case_eq (length a1 == 0); intro Heq. *)
+ (* unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; rewrite aforallbi_spec in H2; intro H3; apply afold_right_implb_true; case_eq (length a1 == 0); intro Heq. *)
(* left; rewrite eqb_spec in Heq; rewrite <- H1; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* destruct (afold_right_implb_true_inv _ _ _ H3) as [H4|[[i [H4 H5]]|H4]]. *)
(* rewrite H4 in Heq; discriminate. *)
(* right; left; exists i; rewrite <- H1; split; auto with smtcoq_core; case_eq (Lit.interp rho (a2 .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_core; intro H6; assert (H7: i < length a1 = true). *)
(* rewrite ltb_spec in *; rewrite eqb_false_spec in Heq; rewrite to_Z_sub_1_diff in H4; auto with smtcoq_core; omega. *)
(* generalize (H2 _ H7); rewrite H4; intro H8; rewrite (interp_check_lit _ _ H8 H6) in H5; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
- (* right; case_eq (existsbi (fun i l => (i < length a2 - 1) && (negb (Lit.interp rho l))) a2). *)
- (* rewrite existsbi_spec; intros [i [_ H5]]; rewrite andb_true_iff in H5; destruct H5 as [H5 H6]; left; exists i; split; auto with smtcoq_core; generalize H6; case (Lit.interp rho (a2 .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_core; discriminate. *)
- (* rewrite existsbi_false_spec; intro H; right; intros i Hi; assert (Hi' := Hi); rewrite <- H1 in Hi'; generalize (H2 _ Hi') (H _ Hi); rewrite <- H1; case (i < length a1 - 1); simpl. *)
+ (* right; case_eq (aexistsbi (fun i l => (i < length a2 - 1) && (negb (Lit.interp rho l))) a2). *)
+ (* rewrite aexistsbi_spec; intros [i [_ H5]]; rewrite andb_true_iff in H5; destruct H5 as [H5 H6]; left; exists i; split; auto with smtcoq_core; generalize H6; case (Lit.interp rho (a2 .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_core; discriminate. *)
+ (* rewrite aexistsbi_false_spec; intro H; right; intros i Hi; assert (Hi' := Hi); rewrite <- H1 in Hi'; generalize (H2 _ Hi') (H _ Hi); rewrite <- H1; case (i < length a1 - 1); simpl. *)
(* intros _; case (Lit.interp rho (a2 .[ i])); auto with smtcoq_core; discriminate. *)
(* intros H5 _; apply (interp_check_lit _ _ H5); apply H4; auto with smtcoq_core. *)
(* (* Xor *) *)
@@ -473,9 +473,9 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
End AUX.
Definition check_hform h1 h2 :=
- foldi_down_cont
+ foldi
(fun _ cont h1 h2 => (h1 == h2) || check_form_aux cont (get_form h1) (get_form h2))
- (PArray.length t_form) 0 (fun h1 h2 => false) h1 h2.
+ 0 (PArray.length t_form) (fun h1 h2 => false) h1 h2.
Definition check_form := check_form_aux check_hform.
@@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ intros. destruct H0; now contradict H0.
Lemma interp_check_hform : forall h1 h2,
check_hform h1 h2 -> Var.interp rho h1 = Var.interp rho h2.
Proof.
- unfold check_hform; apply foldi_down_cont_ind; try discriminate. intros i cont _ _ Hrec h1 h2. unfold is_true; rewrite orb_true_iff; intros [H|H].
- rewrite Int63Properties.eqb_spec in H; rewrite H; auto with smtcoq_core.
+ unfold check_hform; apply foldi_ind; try discriminate. apply leb_0. intros i cont _ _ Hrec h1 h2. unfold is_true; rewrite orb_true_iff; intros [H|H].
+ rewrite Int63.eqb_spec in H; rewrite H; auto with smtcoq_core.
unfold Var.interp; rewrite !wf_interp_form; auto with smtcoq_core; eapply interp_check_form_aux; eauto with smtcoq_core.
Qed.
diff --git a/src/spl/Syntactic.v b/src/spl/Syntactic.v
index 054c5ea..995ea15 100644
--- a/src/spl/Syntactic.v
+++ b/src/spl/Syntactic.v
@@ -184,15 +184,15 @@ Section CheckAtom.
(* N-ary operators *)
- intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; destruct op1 as [t1]; destruct op2 as [t2]; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; change (Typ.eqb t1 t2 = true) with (is_true (Typ.eqb t1 t2)); rewrite Typ.eqb_spec; intros [H1 H2]; subst t2; rewrite (list_beq_compute_interp _ _ _ H2); auto.
(* Application *)
- - intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63Properties.eqb_spec; intros [H2 H1]; subst f2; rewrite (list_beq_correct _ _ H1); auto.
+ - intros [op2|op2 i2|op2 i2 j2|op2 i2 j2|op2 li2|f2 args2]; simpl; try discriminate; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff, Int63.eqb_spec; intros [H2 H1]; subst f2; rewrite (list_beq_correct _ _ H1); auto.
Qed.
End AUX.
Definition check_hatom h1 h2 :=
- foldi_down_cont
+ foldi
(fun _ cont h1 h2 => (h1 == h2) || check_atom_aux cont (t_atom.[h1]) (t_atom.[h2]))
- (PArray.length t_atom) 0 (fun h1 h2 => false) h1 h2.
+ 0 (PArray.length t_atom) (fun h1 h2 => false) h1 h2.
Definition check_atom := check_atom_aux check_hatom.
@@ -230,10 +230,11 @@ Section CheckAtom.
interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h1 = interp_hatom t_i t_func t_atom h2.
Proof.
unfold check_hatom;intros Hwf Hdef.
- apply foldi_down_cont_ind;try discriminate.
+ apply foldi_ind;try discriminate.
+ apply leb_0.
intros i cont _ _ Hrec h1 h2.
unfold is_true; rewrite orb_true_iff; intros [H|H].
- rewrite Int63Properties.eqb_spec in H; rewrite H; reflexivity.
+ rewrite Int63.eqb_spec in H; rewrite H; reflexivity.
unfold interp_hatom;rewrite !t_interp_wf;trivial.
apply check_atom_aux_correct with cont;trivial.
Qed.
@@ -268,7 +269,7 @@ Section CheckAtom.
| Val _ _, Val _ _ => False
end.
Proof.
- unfold wt; unfold is_true at 1; rewrite forallbi_spec; intros Hwt Hwf Hdef h1 h2; unfold check_neg_hatom; case_eq (get_atom h1); try discriminate; intros b1 t11 t12 H1; case_eq (get_atom h2); try discriminate; intros b2 t21 t22 H2; assert (H7: h1 < length t_atom) by (apply PArray.get_not_default_lt; rewrite H1, Hdef; discriminate); generalize (Hwt _ H7); rewrite H1; simpl; generalize H1; case b1; try discriminate; clear H1 b1; simpl; intro H1; case (get_type' t_i (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) h1); try discriminate; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H30 H31]; change (is_true (Typ.eqb (get_type' t_i (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) t11) Typ.TZ)) in H30; change (is_true (Typ.eqb (get_type' t_i (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) t12) Typ.TZ)) in H31; rewrite Typ.eqb_spec in H30, H31; generalize (check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ Hwf t11), (check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ Hwf t12); rewrite H30, H31; intros [v1 Hv1] [v2 Hv2]; generalize H2; case b2; try discriminate; clear H2 b2; intro H2; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H3 H4]; generalize (check_hatom_correct Hwf Hdef _ _ H3), (check_hatom_correct Hwf Hdef _ _ H4); unfold interp_hatom; intros H5 H6; rewrite t_interp_wf; auto; rewrite H1; simpl; rewrite Hv1, Hv2; simpl; rewrite t_interp_wf; auto; rewrite H2; simpl; rewrite <- H5; rewrite <- H6, Hv1, Hv2; simpl.
+ unfold wt; unfold is_true at 1; rewrite aforallbi_spec; intros Hwt Hwf Hdef h1 h2; unfold check_neg_hatom; case_eq (get_atom h1); try discriminate; intros b1 t11 t12 H1; case_eq (get_atom h2); try discriminate; intros b2 t21 t22 H2; assert (H7: h1 < length t_atom) by (apply PArray.get_not_default_lt; rewrite H1, Hdef; discriminate); generalize (Hwt _ H7); rewrite H1; simpl; generalize H1; case b1; try discriminate; clear H1 b1; simpl; intro H1; case (get_type' t_i (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) h1); try discriminate; simpl; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H30 H31]; change (is_true (Typ.eqb (get_type' t_i (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) t11) Typ.TZ)) in H30; change (is_true (Typ.eqb (get_type' t_i (t_interp t_i t_func t_atom) t12) Typ.TZ)) in H31; rewrite Typ.eqb_spec in H30, H31; generalize (check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ Hwf t11), (check_aux_interp_hatom _ t_func _ Hwf t12); rewrite H30, H31; intros [v1 Hv1] [v2 Hv2]; generalize H2; case b2; try discriminate; clear H2 b2; intro H2; unfold is_true; rewrite andb_true_iff; intros [H3 H4]; generalize (check_hatom_correct Hwf Hdef _ _ H3), (check_hatom_correct Hwf Hdef _ _ H4); unfold interp_hatom; intros H5 H6; rewrite t_interp_wf; auto; rewrite H1; simpl; rewrite Hv1, Hv2; simpl; rewrite t_interp_wf; auto; rewrite H2; simpl; rewrite <- H5; rewrite <- H6, Hv1, Hv2; simpl.
rewrite Z.ltb_antisym; auto.
rewrite Z.geb_leb, Z.ltb_antisym; auto.
rewrite Z.leb_antisym; auto.
@@ -332,20 +333,20 @@ Section FLATTEN.
(frec : list _lit -> _lit -> list _lit)
(largs:list _lit) (l:_lit) : list _lit :=
match get_op l with
- | Some a => PArray.fold_left frec largs a
+ | Some a => foldi (fun i x => frec x (a.[i])) 0 (length a) largs
| None => l::largs
end.
(* Register flatten_op_body as PrimInline. *)
Definition flatten_op_lit (get_op:_lit -> option (array _lit)) max :=
- foldi_cont (fun _ => flatten_op_body get_op) 0 max (fun largs l => l::largs).
+ foldi (fun _ => flatten_op_body get_op) 0 max (fun largs l => l::largs).
Definition flatten_and t :=
- PArray.fold_left (flatten_op_lit get_and (PArray.length t_form)) nil t.
+ foldi (fun i x => flatten_op_lit get_and (PArray.length t_form) x (t.[i])) 0 (length t) nil.
Definition flatten_or t :=
- PArray.fold_left (flatten_op_lit get_or (PArray.length t_form)) nil t.
+ foldi (fun i x => flatten_op_lit get_or (PArray.length t_form) x (t.[i])) 0 (length t) nil.
Variable check_atom check_neg_atom : atom -> atom -> bool.
@@ -371,7 +372,7 @@ Section FLATTEN.
frec l1 lf1 && frec l2 lf2
| Fimp args1, Fimp args2 =>
if PArray.length args1 == PArray.length args2 then
- PArray.forallbi (fun i l => frec l (args2.[i])) args1
+ aforallbi (fun i l => frec l (args2.[i])) args1
else false
| Fiff l1 l2, Fiff lf1 lf2 =>
frec l1 lf1 && frec l2 lf2
@@ -387,7 +388,7 @@ Section FLATTEN.
(* Register check_flatten_body as PrimInline. *)
Definition check_flatten_aux l lf :=
- foldi_cont (fun _ => check_flatten_body) 0 (PArray.length t_form) (fun _ _ => false) l lf.
+ foldi (fun _ => check_flatten_body) 0 (PArray.length t_form) (fun _ _ => false) l lf.
Definition check_flatten s cid lf :=
match S.get s cid with
@@ -412,8 +413,11 @@ Section FLATTEN.
Lemma interp_Fnot2 : forall i l, interp interp_atom interp_bvatom t_form (Fnot2 i l) = interp_lit l.
Proof.
- intros i l;simpl;apply fold_ind;trivial.
- intros a;rewrite negb_involutive;trivial.
+ intros i l;simpl.
+ apply foldi_ind.
+ apply leb_0.
+ reflexivity.
+ intros; rewrite negb_involutive; assumption.
Qed.
Lemma remove_not_correct :
@@ -452,23 +456,21 @@ Section FLATTEN.
Lemma flatten_and_correct : forall args,
List.fold_right (fun l res => andb res (interp_lit l)) true (flatten_and args) =
- afold_left _ _ true andb interp_lit args.
+ afold_left _ true andb (amap interp_lit args).
Proof.
intros;rewrite afold_left_spec;auto;unfold flatten_and.
- set (t:= true);unfold t at 2;
- change true with
- (List.fold_right (fun (l : int) (res : bool) => res && interp_lit l) true nil).
- unfold t;clear t.
- rewrite !fold_left_to_list.
+ change true with (List.fold_right (fun (l : int) (res : bool) => res && interp_lit l) true nil) at 2.
+ rewrite !foldi_to_list, to_list_amap.
generalize (@nil int);induction (to_list args);simpl;trivial.
intros l0;rewrite IHl.
clear IHl;f_equal; unfold flatten_op_lit.
- clear l;revert a l0;apply foldi_cont_ind;simpl;trivial.
- intros i cont _ Hle Hrec a l;unfold flatten_op_body.
+ clear l;revert a l0;apply foldi_ind;simpl;trivial.
+ apply leb_0.
+ intros i cont _ Hlt Hrec a l;unfold flatten_op_body.
case_eq (get_and a);intros;trivial.
rewrite get_and_correct with (1:= H);simpl.
- rewrite afold_left_spec; auto; rewrite !fold_left_to_list.
- rewrite <- !fold_left_rev_right.
+ rewrite afold_left_spec; auto; rewrite !foldi_to_list.
+ rewrite <- !fold_left_rev_right, to_list_amap, <- map_rev.
clear H a;revert l;induction (List.rev (to_list a0));simpl.
intros l;rewrite andb_true_r;trivial.
intros;rewrite Hrec, IHl, andb_assoc;trivial.
@@ -476,23 +478,21 @@ Section FLATTEN.
Lemma flatten_or_correct : forall args,
List.fold_right (fun l res => orb res (interp_lit l)) false (flatten_or args) =
- afold_left _ _ false orb interp_lit args.
+ afold_left _ false orb (amap interp_lit args).
Proof.
intros;rewrite afold_left_spec;auto;unfold flatten_or.
- set (t:= false);unfold t at 2;
- change false with
- (List.fold_right (fun (l : int) (res : bool) => res || interp_lit l) false nil).
- unfold t;clear t.
- rewrite !fold_left_to_list.
+ change false with (List.fold_right (fun (l : int) (res : bool) => res || interp_lit l) false nil) at 2.
+ rewrite !foldi_to_list, to_list_amap.
generalize (@nil int);induction (to_list args);simpl;trivial.
intros l0;rewrite IHl.
clear IHl;f_equal; unfold flatten_op_lit.
- clear l;revert a l0;apply foldi_cont_ind;simpl;trivial.
- intros i cont _ Hle Hrec a l;unfold flatten_op_body.
+ clear l;revert a l0;apply foldi_ind;simpl;trivial.
+ apply leb_0.
+ intros i cont _ Hlt Hrec a l;unfold flatten_op_body.
case_eq (get_or a);intros;trivial.
rewrite get_or_correct with (1:= H);simpl.
- rewrite afold_left_spec; auto; rewrite !fold_left_to_list.
- rewrite <- !fold_left_rev_right.
+ rewrite afold_left_spec; auto; rewrite !foldi_to_list.
+ rewrite <- !fold_left_rev_right, to_list_amap, <- map_rev.
clear H a;revert l;induction (List.rev (to_list a0));simpl.
intros l;rewrite orb_false_r;trivial.
intros;rewrite Hrec, IHl, orb_assoc;trivial.
@@ -503,7 +503,8 @@ Section FLATTEN.
interp_lit l = interp_lit lf.
Proof.
unfold check_flatten_aux.
- apply foldi_cont_ind.
+ apply foldi_ind.
+ apply leb_0.
discriminate.
intros i cont _ Hle Hrec l lf;unfold check_flatten_body.
rewrite <- (remove_not_correct l), <- (remove_not_correct lf).
@@ -513,7 +514,7 @@ Section FLATTEN.
unfold Lit.interp.
assert (Lit.is_pos l = Lit.is_pos lf).
unfold Lit.is_pos.
- rewrite <- eqb_spec, land_comm in e.
+ rewrite <- eqb_spec, landC in e.
change (is_true (is_even (l lxor lf))) in e.
rewrite is_even_xor in e.
destruct (is_even l);destruct (is_even lf);trivial;discriminate.
@@ -542,8 +543,8 @@ Section FLATTEN.
rewrite (Hrec _ _ H1), (IHl0 _ H2);trivial.
(* implb *)
revert H;destruct (reflect_eqb (length a) (length a0));[intros|discriminate].
- apply afold_right_eq;trivial.
- rewrite forallbi_spec in H;auto.
+ apply afold_right_eq;rewrite !length_amap;trivial.
+ intros;rewrite !get_amap by congruence;rewrite aforallbi_spec in H;auto.
(* xorb *)
unfold is_true in H;rewrite andb_true_iff in H;destruct H as [H H0].
rewrite (Hrec _ _ H), (Hrec _ _ H0);trivial.
@@ -556,7 +557,7 @@ Section FLATTEN.
(** opposite sign *)
assert (Lit.is_pos l = negb (Lit.is_pos lf)).
unfold Lit.is_pos.
- rewrite <- eqb_spec, land_comm in n0.
+ rewrite <- eqb_spec, landC in n0.
change (~is_true (is_even (l lxor lf))) in n0.
rewrite is_even_xor in n0.
destruct (is_even l);destruct (is_even lf);trivial;elim n0;reflexivity.