aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorckeller <ckeller@users.noreply.github.com>2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100
commit7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea (patch)
treeba7537e1e813cabf9ee0d910f845c71fa5f446e7 /src/zchaff/zchaff.ml
parent36548d6634864a131cc83ce21491c797163de305 (diff)
downloadsmtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.tar.gz
smtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.zip
Merge from LFSC (#26)
* Showing models as coq counter examples in tactic without constructing coq terms * also read models when calling cvc4 with a file (deactivated because cvc4 crashes) * Show counter examples with variables in the order they are quantified in the Coq goal * Circumvent issue with ocamldep * fix issue with dependencies * fix issue with dependencies * Translation and OCaml support for extract, zero_extend, sign_extend * Show run times of components * print time on stdout instead * Tests now work with new version (master) of CVC4 * fix small printing issue * look for date on mac os x * proof of valid_check_bbShl: some cases to prove. * full proof of "left shift checker". * full proof of "rigth shift checker". * Support translation of terms bvlshr, bvshl but LFSC rules do not exists at the moment Bug fix for bitvector extract (inverted arguments) * Typo * More modularity on the format of traces depending on the version of coq * More straightforward definitions in Int63Native_standard * Use the Int31 library with coq-8.5 * Use the most efficient operations of Int31 * Improved performance with coq-8.5 * Uniform treatment of sat and smt tactics * Hopefully solved the problem with universes for the tactic * Updated the installation instructions * Holes for unsupported bit blasting rules * Cherry-picking from smtcoq/smtcoq * bug fix hole for bitblast * Predefined arrays are not required anymore * fix issue with coq bbT and bitof construction from ocaml * bug fix in smtAtom for uninterpreted functions fix verit test file * fix issue with smtlib2 extract parsing * It looks like we still need the PArray function instances for some examples (see vmcai_bytes.smt2) * Solver specific reification: Each solver has a list of supported theories which is passed to Atom.of_coq, this function creates uninterpreted functions / sorts for unsupported features. * show counter-examples with const_farray instead of const for constant array definitions * Vernacular commands to debug checkers. Verit/Lfsc_Checker_Debug will always fail, reporting the first proof step of the certificate that failed be checked * Update INSTALL.md * show smtcoq proof when converting * (Hopefully) repared the universes problems * Corrected a bug with holes in proofs * scripts for tests: create a folder "work" under "lfsc/tests/", locate the benchmarks there. create a folder "results" under "lfsc/tests/work/" in which you'll find the results of ./cvc4tocoq. * make sure to give correct path for your benchs... * Checker for array extensionality modulo symmetry of equality * fix oversight with bitvectors larger than 63 bits * some printing functions for smt2 ast * handle smtlib2 files with more complicated equivalence with (= ... ) * revert: ./cvc4tocoq does not output lfsc proofs... * bug fix one input was ignored * Don't show verit translation of LFSC proof if environment variable DONTSHOWVERIT is set (e.g. put export DONTSHOWVERIT="" in your .bashrc or .bashprofile) * Also sort names of introduced variables when showing counter-example * input files for which SMTCoq retuns false. * input files for which SMTCoq retuns false. * use debug checker for debug file * More efficient debug checker * better approximate number of failing step of certificate in debug checker * fix mistake in ml4 * very first attempt to support goals in Prop * bvs: comparison predicates in Prop and their <-> proofs with the ones in bool farrays: equality predicate in Prop and its <-> proof with the one in bool. * unit, Bool, Z, Pos: comparison and equality predicates in Prop. * a typo fixed. * an example of array equality in Prop (converted into Bool by hand)... TODO: enhance the search space of cvc4 tactic. * first version of cvc4' tactic: "solves" the goals in Prop. WARNING: supports only bv and array goals and might not be complete TODO: add support for lia goals * cvc4' support for lia WARNING: might not be complete! * small fix in cvc4' and some variations of examples * small fix + support for goals in Bool and Bool = true + use of solve tactical WARNING: does not support UF and INT63 goals in Prop * cvc4': better arrangement * cvc4': Prop2Bool by context search... * cvc4': solve tactial added -> do not modify unsolved goals. * developer documentation for the smtcoq repo * cvc4': rudimentary support for uninterpreted function goals in Prop. * cvc4': support for goals with Leibniz equality... WARNING: necessary use of "Grab Existential Variables." to instantiate variable types for farrays! * cvc4': Z.lt adapted + better support from verit... * cvc4': support for Z.le, Z.ge, Z.gt. * Try arrays with default value (with a constructor for constant arrays), but extensionality is not provable * cvc4': support for equality over uninterpreted types * lfsc demo: goals in Coq's Prop. * lfsc demo: goals in Bool. * Fix issue with existential variables generated by prop2bool. - prop2bool tactic exported by SMTCoq - remove useless stuff * update usage and installation instructions * Update INSTALL.md * highlighting * the tactic: bool2prop. * clean up * the tactic smt: very first version. * smt: return unsolved goals in Prop. * Show when a certificate cannot be checked when running the tactic instead of at Qed * Tactic improvements - Handle negation/True/False in prop/bool conversions tactic. - Remove alias for farray (this caused problem for matching on this type in tactics). - Tactic `smt` that combines cvc4 and veriT. - return subgoals in prop * test change header * smt: support for negated goals + some reorganization. * conflicts resolved + some reorganization. * a way to solve the issue with ambiguous coercions. * reorganization. * small change. * another small change. * developer documentation of the tactics. * developer guide: some improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * developer guide: some more improvements. * pass correct environment for conversion + better error messages * cleaning * ReflectFacts added. * re-organizing developers' guide. * re-organizing developers' guide. * re-organizing developers' guide. * removing unused maps. * headers. * artifact readme getting started... * first attempt * second... * third... * 4th... * 5th... * 6th... * 7th... * 8th... * 9th... * 10th... * 11th... * 12th... * 13th... * 14th... * 15th... * 16th... * 17th... * Update artifact.md Use links to lfsc repository like in the paper * 18th... * 19th... * 20th... * 21st... * 22nd... * 23rd... * 24th... * 25th... * 26th... * 27th... * 28th... * Update artifact.md Small reorganization * minor edits * More minor edits * revised description of tactics * Final pass * typo * name changed: artifact-readme.md * file added... * passwd chaged... * links... * removal * performance statement... * typos... * the link to the artifact image updated... * suggestions by Guy... * aux files removed... * clean-up... * clean-up... * some small changes... * small fix... * additional information on newly created files after running cvc4tocoq script... * some small fix... * another small fix... * typo... * small fix... * another small fix... * fix... * link to the artifact image... * We do not want to force vm_cast for the Theorem commands * no_check variants of the tactics * TODO: a veriT test does not work anymore * Compiles with both versions of Coq * Test of the tactics in real conditions * Comment on this case study * an example for the FroCoS paper. * Fix smt tactic that doesn't return cvc4's subgoals * readme modifications * readme modifications 2 * small typo in readme. * small changes in readme. * small changes in readme. * typo in readme. * Sync with https://github.com/LFSC/smtcoq * Port to Coq 8.6 * README * README * INSTALL * Missing file * Yves' proposition for installation instructions * Updated link to CVC4 * Compiles again with native-coq * Compiles with both versions of Coq * Command to bypass typechecking when generating a zchaff theorem * Solved bug on cuts from Hole * Counter-models for uninterpreted sorts (improves issue #13) * OCaml version note (#15) * update .gitignore * needs OCaml 4.04.0 * Solving merge issues (under progress) * Make SmtBtype compile * Compilation of SmtForm under progress * Make SmtForm compile * Make SmtCertif compile * Make SmtTrace compile * Make SatAtom compile * Make smtAtom compile * Make CnfParser compile * Make Zchaff compile * Make VeritSyntax compile * Make VeritParser compile * Make lfsc/tosmtcoq compile * Make smtlib2_genconstr compile * smtCommand under progress * smtCommands and verit compile again * lfsc compiles * ml4 compiles * Everything compiles * All ZChaff unit tests and most verit unit tests (but taut5 and un_menteur) go through * Most LFSC tests ok; some fail due to the problem of verit; a few fail due to an error "Not_found" to investigate * Authors and headings * Compiles with native-coq * Typo
Diffstat (limited to 'src/zchaff/zchaff.ml')
-rw-r--r--src/zchaff/zchaff.ml69
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml b/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml
index 928dd8d..2bbb23d 100644
--- a/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml
+++ b/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
(**************************************************************************)
(* *)
(* SMTCoq *)
-(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2016 *)
+(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *)
(* *)
-(* Michaël Armand *)
-(* Benjamin Grégoire *)
-(* Chantal Keller *)
-(* *)
-(* Inria - École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Sud *)
+(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *)
(* *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *)
(* *)
@@ -62,6 +58,8 @@ and pp_pform fmt p =
| Fapp(op,args) ->
Format.fprintf fmt "%s" (string_of_op op);
Array.iter (fun a -> Format.fprintf fmt "%a " pp_form a) args
+ (* Nothing to do with ZChaff *)
+ | FbbT _ -> assert false
let pp_value fmt c =
match c.value with
@@ -228,7 +226,7 @@ let theorems interp name fdimacs ftrace =
let certif =
mklApp cCertif [|mkInt (max_id + 1);tres;mkInt (get_pos confl)|] in
- let theorem_concl = mklApp cis_true [|mklApp cnegb [|interp d first last|] |] in
+ let theorem_concl = mklApp cnot [|mklApp cis_true [|interp d first last|] |] in
let vtype = Term.mkProd(Names.Anonymous, Lazy.force cint, Lazy.force cbool) in
let theorem_type =
Term.mkProd (mkName "v", vtype, theorem_concl) in
@@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ let theorems interp name fdimacs ftrace =
Term.mkLambda (mkName "v", vtype,
mklApp ctheorem_checker
[| Term.mkRel 3(*d*); Term.mkRel 2(*c*);
- vm_cast_true
+ vm_cast_true_no_check
(mklApp cchecker [|Term.mkRel 3(*d*); Term.mkRel 2(*c*)|]);
Term.mkRel 1(*v*)|]))),
Term.VMcast,
@@ -361,7 +359,7 @@ let cchecker_eq_correct =
gen_constant cnf_checker_modules "checker_eq_correct"
let cchecker_eq = gen_constant cnf_checker_modules "checker_eq"
-let build_body reify_atom reify_form l b (max_id, confl) =
+let build_body reify_atom reify_form l b (max_id, confl) vm_cast =
let ntvar = mkName "t_var" in
let ntform = mkName "t_form" in
let nc = mkName "c" in
@@ -374,25 +372,27 @@ let build_body reify_atom reify_form l b (max_id, confl) =
let vtvar = Term.mkRel 3 in
let vtform = Term.mkRel 2 in
let vc = Term.mkRel 1 in
- let proof_cast =
+ let add_lets t =
Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|],
Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|],
Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif,
- mklApp cchecker_b_correct
- [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc;
- vm_cast_true (mklApp cchecker_b [|vtform;l;b;vc|])|])))
+ t)))
+ in
+ let cbc =
+ add_lets
+ (mklApp cchecker_b [|vtform;l;b;vc|]) |> vm_cast in
+ let proof_cast =
+ add_lets
+ (mklApp cchecker_b_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc; cbc|])
in
let proof_nocast =
- Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|],
- Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|],
- Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif,
- mklApp cchecker_b_correct
- [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc|])))
+ add_lets
+ (mklApp cchecker_b_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc|])
in
(proof_cast, proof_nocast)
-let build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form l1 l2 l (max_id, confl) =
+let build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form l1 l2 l (max_id, confl) vm_cast =
let ntvar = mkName "t_var" in
let ntform = mkName "t_form" in
let nc = mkName "c" in
@@ -405,20 +405,20 @@ let build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form l1 l2 l (max_id, confl) =
let vtvar = Term.mkRel 3 in
let vtform = Term.mkRel 2 in
let vc = Term.mkRel 1 in
- let proof_cast =
+ let add_lets t =
Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|],
Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|],
Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif,
- mklApp cchecker_eq_correct
- [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc;
- vm_cast_true (mklApp cchecker_eq [|vtform;l1;l2;l;vc|])|])))
+ t)))
+ in
+ let ceqc = add_lets (mklApp cchecker_eq [|vtform;l1;l2;l;vc|])
+ |> vm_cast in
+ let proof_cast =
+ add_lets
+ (mklApp cchecker_eq_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc; ceqc|])
in
let proof_nocast =
- Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|],
- Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|],
- Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif,
- mklApp cchecker_eq_correct
- [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc|])))
+ add_lets (mklApp cchecker_eq_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc|])
in
(proof_cast, proof_nocast)
@@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ let make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl env reify_form l =
let value = if ispos then " = true" else " = false" in
acc^" "^(Pp.string_of_ppcmds (Structures.pr_constr_env env t))^value
| Fapp _ -> acc
+ (* Nothing to do with ZChaff *)
+ | FbbT _ -> assert false
) with | Invalid_argument _ -> acc (* Because cnf computation does not put the new formulas in the table... Perhaps it should? *)
) "zchaff found a counterexample:\n" model)
);
@@ -520,10 +522,10 @@ let make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl env reify_form l =
(* The whole tactic *)
-let core_tactic env sigma t =
+let core_tactic vm_cast env sigma concl =
SmtTrace.clear ();
- let (forall_let, concl) = Term.decompose_prod_assum t in
+ let (forall_let, concl) = Term.decompose_prod_assum concl in
let a, b = get_arguments concl in
let reify_atom = Atom.create () in
let reify_form = Form.create () in
@@ -534,7 +536,7 @@ let core_tactic env sigma t =
let atom_tbl = Atom.atom_tbl reify_atom in
let pform_tbl = Form.pform_tbl reify_form in
let max_id_confl = make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl (Environ.push_rel_context forall_let env) reify_form l' in
- build_body reify_atom reify_form (Form.to_coq l) b max_id_confl
+ build_body reify_atom reify_form (Form.to_coq l) b max_id_confl (vm_cast env)
else
let l1 = Form.of_coq (Atom.get reify_atom) reify_form a in
let l2 = Form.of_coq (Atom.get reify_atom) reify_form b in
@@ -543,7 +545,7 @@ let core_tactic env sigma t =
let pform_tbl = Form.pform_tbl reify_form in
let max_id_confl = make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl (Environ.push_rel_context forall_let env) reify_form l in
build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form
- (Form.to_coq l1) (Form.to_coq l2) (Form.to_coq l) max_id_confl
+ (Form.to_coq l1) (Form.to_coq l2) (Form.to_coq l) max_id_confl (vm_cast env)
in
let compose_lam_assum forall_let body =
@@ -556,4 +558,5 @@ let core_tactic env sigma t =
(Structures.vm_cast_no_check res_cast))
-let tactic () = Structures.tclTHEN Tactics.intros (Structures.mk_tactic core_tactic)
+let tactic () = Structures.tclTHEN Tactics.intros (Structures.mk_tactic (core_tactic vm_cast_true))
+let tactic_no_check () = Structures.tclTHEN Tactics.intros (Structures.mk_tactic (core_tactic (fun _ -> vm_cast_true_no_check)))