diff options
author | ckeller <ckeller@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2019-01-28 23:19:12 +0100 |
commit | 7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea (patch) | |
tree | ba7537e1e813cabf9ee0d910f845c71fa5f446e7 /src/zchaff/zchaff.ml | |
parent | 36548d6634864a131cc83ce21491c797163de305 (diff) | |
download | smtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.tar.gz smtcoq-7021c53d4ecf97c82ccebb6bb45f5305d8b482ea.zip |
Merge from LFSC (#26)
* Showing models as coq counter examples in tactic without constructing coq terms
* also read models when calling cvc4 with a file (deactivated because cvc4 crashes)
* Show counter examples with variables in the order they are quantified in the Coq goal
* Circumvent issue with ocamldep
* fix issue with dependencies
* fix issue with dependencies
* Translation and OCaml support for extract, zero_extend, sign_extend
* Show run times of components
* print time on stdout instead
* Tests now work with new version (master) of CVC4
* fix small printing issue
* look for date on mac os x
* proof of valid_check_bbShl: some cases to prove.
* full proof of "left shift checker".
* full proof of "rigth shift checker".
* Support translation of terms bvlshr, bvshl but LFSC rules do not exists at the moment
Bug fix for bitvector extract (inverted arguments)
* Typo
* More modularity on the format of traces depending on the version of coq
* More straightforward definitions in Int63Native_standard
* Use the Int31 library with coq-8.5
* Use the most efficient operations of Int31
* Improved performance with coq-8.5
* Uniform treatment of sat and smt tactics
* Hopefully solved the problem with universes for the tactic
* Updated the installation instructions
* Holes for unsupported bit blasting rules
* Cherry-picking from smtcoq/smtcoq
* bug fix hole for bitblast
* Predefined arrays are not required anymore
* fix issue with coq bbT and bitof construction from ocaml
* bug fix in smtAtom for uninterpreted functions
fix verit test file
* fix issue with smtlib2 extract parsing
* It looks like we still need the PArray function instances for some examples (see vmcai_bytes.smt2)
* Solver specific reification:
Each solver has a list of supported theories which is passed to Atom.of_coq, this function creates uninterpreted functions / sorts for unsupported features.
* show counter-examples with const_farray instead of const for constant array definitions
* Vernacular commands to debug checkers.
Verit/Lfsc_Checker_Debug will always fail, reporting the first proof step of the certificate that failed be checked
* Update INSTALL.md
* show smtcoq proof when converting
* (Hopefully) repared the universes problems
* Corrected a bug with holes in proofs
* scripts for tests:
create a folder "work" under "lfsc/tests/", locate the benchmarks there.
create a folder "results" under "lfsc/tests/work/" in which you'll find the results of ./cvc4tocoq.
* make sure to give correct path for your benchs...
* Checker for array extensionality modulo symmetry of equality
* fix oversight with bitvectors larger than 63 bits
* some printing functions for smt2 ast
* handle smtlib2 files with more complicated equivalence with (= ... )
* revert: ./cvc4tocoq does not output lfsc proofs...
* bug fix one input was ignored
* Don't show verit translation of LFSC proof if environment variable DONTSHOWVERIT is set
(e.g. put export DONTSHOWVERIT="" in your .bashrc or .bashprofile)
* Also sort names of introduced variables when showing counter-example
* input files for which SMTCoq retuns false.
* input files for which SMTCoq retuns false.
* use debug checker for debug file
* More efficient debug checker
* better approximate number of failing step of certificate in debug checker
* fix mistake in ml4
* very first attempt to support goals in Prop
* bvs: comparison predicates in Prop and their <-> proofs with the ones in bool
farrays: equality predicate in Prop and its <-> proof with the one in bool.
* unit, Bool, Z, Pos: comparison and equality predicates in Prop.
* a typo fixed.
* an example of array equality in Prop (converted into Bool by hand)...
TODO: enhance the search space of cvc4 tactic.
* first version of cvc4' tactic: "solves" the goals in Prop.
WARNING: supports only bv and array goals and might not be complete
TODO: add support for lia goals
* cvc4' support for lia
WARNING: might not be complete!
* small fix in cvc4' and some variations of examples
* small fix + support for goals in Bool and Bool = true + use of solve tactical
WARNING: does not support UF and INT63 goals in Prop
* cvc4': better arrangement
* cvc4': Prop2Bool by context search...
* cvc4': solve tactial added -> do not modify unsolved goals.
* developer documentation for the smtcoq repo
* cvc4': rudimentary support for uninterpreted function goals in Prop.
* cvc4': support for goals with Leibniz equality...
WARNING: necessary use of "Grab Existential Variables." to instantiate variable types for farrays!
* cvc4': Z.lt adapted + better support from verit...
* cvc4': support for Z.le, Z.ge, Z.gt.
* Try arrays with default value (with a constructor for constant arrays), but extensionality is not provable
* cvc4': support for equality over uninterpreted types
* lfsc demo: goals in Coq's Prop.
* lfsc demo: goals in Bool.
* Fix issue with existential variables generated by prop2bool.
- prop2bool tactic exported by SMTCoq
- remove useless stuff
* update usage and installation instructions
* Update INSTALL.md
* highlighting
* the tactic: bool2prop.
* clean up
* the tactic smt: very first version.
* smt: return unsolved goals in Prop.
* Show when a certificate cannot be checked when running the tactic instead of at Qed
* Tactic improvements
- Handle negation/True/False in prop/bool conversions tactic.
- Remove alias for farray (this caused problem for matching on this type in tactics).
- Tactic `smt` that combines cvc4 and veriT.
- return subgoals in prop
* test change header
* smt: support for negated goals + some reorganization.
* conflicts resolved + some reorganization.
* a way to solve the issue with ambiguous coercions.
* reorganization.
* small change.
* another small change.
* developer documentation of the tactics.
* developer guide: some improvements.
* developer guide: some more improvements.
* developer guide: some more improvements.
* developer guide: some more improvements.
* pass correct environment for conversion + better error messages
* cleaning
* ReflectFacts added.
* re-organizing developers' guide.
* re-organizing developers' guide.
* re-organizing developers' guide.
* removing unused maps.
* headers.
* artifact readme getting started...
* first attempt
* second...
* third...
* 4th...
* 5th...
* 6th...
* 7th...
* 8th...
* 9th...
* 10th...
* 11th...
* 12th...
* 13th...
* 14th...
* 15th...
* 16th...
* 17th...
* Update artifact.md
Use links to lfsc repository like in the paper
* 18th...
* 19th...
* 20th...
* 21st...
* 22nd...
* 23rd...
* 24th...
* 25th...
* 26th...
* 27th...
* 28th...
* Update artifact.md
Small reorganization
* minor edits
* More minor edits
* revised description of tactics
* Final pass
* typo
* name changed: artifact-readme.md
* file added...
* passwd chaged...
* links...
* removal
* performance statement...
* typos...
* the link to the artifact image updated...
* suggestions by Guy...
* aux files removed...
* clean-up...
* clean-up...
* some small changes...
* small fix...
* additional information on newly created files after running cvc4tocoq script...
* some small fix...
* another small fix...
* typo...
* small fix...
* another small fix...
* fix...
* link to the artifact image...
* We do not want to force vm_cast for the Theorem commands
* no_check variants of the tactics
* TODO: a veriT test does not work anymore
* Compiles with both versions of Coq
* Test of the tactics in real conditions
* Comment on this case study
* an example for the FroCoS paper.
* Fix smt tactic that doesn't return cvc4's subgoals
* readme modifications
* readme modifications 2
* small typo in readme.
* small changes in readme.
* small changes in readme.
* typo in readme.
* Sync with https://github.com/LFSC/smtcoq
* Port to Coq 8.6
* README
* README
* INSTALL
* Missing file
* Yves' proposition for installation instructions
* Updated link to CVC4
* Compiles again with native-coq
* Compiles with both versions of Coq
* Command to bypass typechecking when generating a zchaff theorem
* Solved bug on cuts from Hole
* Counter-models for uninterpreted sorts (improves issue #13)
* OCaml version note (#15)
* update .gitignore
* needs OCaml 4.04.0
* Solving merge issues (under progress)
* Make SmtBtype compile
* Compilation of SmtForm under progress
* Make SmtForm compile
* Make SmtCertif compile
* Make SmtTrace compile
* Make SatAtom compile
* Make smtAtom compile
* Make CnfParser compile
* Make Zchaff compile
* Make VeritSyntax compile
* Make VeritParser compile
* Make lfsc/tosmtcoq compile
* Make smtlib2_genconstr compile
* smtCommand under progress
* smtCommands and verit compile again
* lfsc compiles
* ml4 compiles
* Everything compiles
* All ZChaff unit tests and most verit unit tests (but taut5 and un_menteur) go through
* Most LFSC tests ok; some fail due to the problem of verit; a few fail due to an error "Not_found" to investigate
* Authors and headings
* Compiles with native-coq
* Typo
Diffstat (limited to 'src/zchaff/zchaff.ml')
-rw-r--r-- | src/zchaff/zchaff.ml | 69 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml b/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml index 928dd8d..2bbb23d 100644 --- a/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml +++ b/src/zchaff/zchaff.ml @@ -1,13 +1,9 @@ (**************************************************************************) (* *) (* SMTCoq *) -(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2016 *) +(* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2019 *) (* *) -(* Michaël Armand *) -(* Benjamin Grégoire *) -(* Chantal Keller *) -(* *) -(* Inria - École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Sud *) +(* See file "AUTHORS" for the list of authors *) (* *) (* This file is distributed under the terms of the CeCILL-C licence *) (* *) @@ -62,6 +58,8 @@ and pp_pform fmt p = | Fapp(op,args) -> Format.fprintf fmt "%s" (string_of_op op); Array.iter (fun a -> Format.fprintf fmt "%a " pp_form a) args + (* Nothing to do with ZChaff *) + | FbbT _ -> assert false let pp_value fmt c = match c.value with @@ -228,7 +226,7 @@ let theorems interp name fdimacs ftrace = let certif = mklApp cCertif [|mkInt (max_id + 1);tres;mkInt (get_pos confl)|] in - let theorem_concl = mklApp cis_true [|mklApp cnegb [|interp d first last|] |] in + let theorem_concl = mklApp cnot [|mklApp cis_true [|interp d first last|] |] in let vtype = Term.mkProd(Names.Anonymous, Lazy.force cint, Lazy.force cbool) in let theorem_type = Term.mkProd (mkName "v", vtype, theorem_concl) in @@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ let theorems interp name fdimacs ftrace = Term.mkLambda (mkName "v", vtype, mklApp ctheorem_checker [| Term.mkRel 3(*d*); Term.mkRel 2(*c*); - vm_cast_true + vm_cast_true_no_check (mklApp cchecker [|Term.mkRel 3(*d*); Term.mkRel 2(*c*)|]); Term.mkRel 1(*v*)|]))), Term.VMcast, @@ -361,7 +359,7 @@ let cchecker_eq_correct = gen_constant cnf_checker_modules "checker_eq_correct" let cchecker_eq = gen_constant cnf_checker_modules "checker_eq" -let build_body reify_atom reify_form l b (max_id, confl) = +let build_body reify_atom reify_form l b (max_id, confl) vm_cast = let ntvar = mkName "t_var" in let ntform = mkName "t_form" in let nc = mkName "c" in @@ -374,25 +372,27 @@ let build_body reify_atom reify_form l b (max_id, confl) = let vtvar = Term.mkRel 3 in let vtform = Term.mkRel 2 in let vc = Term.mkRel 1 in - let proof_cast = + let add_lets t = Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|], Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|], Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif, - mklApp cchecker_b_correct - [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc; - vm_cast_true (mklApp cchecker_b [|vtform;l;b;vc|])|]))) + t))) + in + let cbc = + add_lets + (mklApp cchecker_b [|vtform;l;b;vc|]) |> vm_cast in + let proof_cast = + add_lets + (mklApp cchecker_b_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc; cbc|]) in let proof_nocast = - Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|], - Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|], - Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif, - mklApp cchecker_b_correct - [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc|]))) + add_lets + (mklApp cchecker_b_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l; b; vc|]) in (proof_cast, proof_nocast) -let build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form l1 l2 l (max_id, confl) = +let build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form l1 l2 l (max_id, confl) vm_cast = let ntvar = mkName "t_var" in let ntform = mkName "t_form" in let nc = mkName "c" in @@ -405,20 +405,20 @@ let build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form l1 l2 l (max_id, confl) = let vtvar = Term.mkRel 3 in let vtform = Term.mkRel 2 in let vc = Term.mkRel 1 in - let proof_cast = + let add_lets t = Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|], Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|], Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif, - mklApp cchecker_eq_correct - [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc; - vm_cast_true (mklApp cchecker_eq [|vtform;l1;l2;l;vc|])|]))) + t))) + in + let ceqc = add_lets (mklApp cchecker_eq [|vtform;l1;l2;l;vc|]) + |> vm_cast in + let proof_cast = + add_lets + (mklApp cchecker_eq_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc; ceqc|]) in let proof_nocast = - Term.mkLetIn (ntvar, tvar, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cbool|], - Term.mkLetIn (ntform, tform, mklApp carray [|Lazy.force cform|], - Term.mkLetIn (nc, certif, Lazy.force ccertif, - mklApp cchecker_eq_correct - [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc|]))) + add_lets (mklApp cchecker_eq_correct [|vtvar; vtform; l1; l2; l; vc|]) in (proof_cast, proof_nocast) @@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ let make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl env reify_form l = let value = if ispos then " = true" else " = false" in acc^" "^(Pp.string_of_ppcmds (Structures.pr_constr_env env t))^value | Fapp _ -> acc + (* Nothing to do with ZChaff *) + | FbbT _ -> assert false ) with | Invalid_argument _ -> acc (* Because cnf computation does not put the new formulas in the table... Perhaps it should? *) ) "zchaff found a counterexample:\n" model) ); @@ -520,10 +522,10 @@ let make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl env reify_form l = (* The whole tactic *) -let core_tactic env sigma t = +let core_tactic vm_cast env sigma concl = SmtTrace.clear (); - let (forall_let, concl) = Term.decompose_prod_assum t in + let (forall_let, concl) = Term.decompose_prod_assum concl in let a, b = get_arguments concl in let reify_atom = Atom.create () in let reify_form = Form.create () in @@ -534,7 +536,7 @@ let core_tactic env sigma t = let atom_tbl = Atom.atom_tbl reify_atom in let pform_tbl = Form.pform_tbl reify_form in let max_id_confl = make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl (Environ.push_rel_context forall_let env) reify_form l' in - build_body reify_atom reify_form (Form.to_coq l) b max_id_confl + build_body reify_atom reify_form (Form.to_coq l) b max_id_confl (vm_cast env) else let l1 = Form.of_coq (Atom.get reify_atom) reify_form a in let l2 = Form.of_coq (Atom.get reify_atom) reify_form b in @@ -543,7 +545,7 @@ let core_tactic env sigma t = let pform_tbl = Form.pform_tbl reify_form in let max_id_confl = make_proof pform_tbl atom_tbl (Environ.push_rel_context forall_let env) reify_form l in build_body_eq reify_atom reify_form - (Form.to_coq l1) (Form.to_coq l2) (Form.to_coq l) max_id_confl + (Form.to_coq l1) (Form.to_coq l2) (Form.to_coq l) max_id_confl (vm_cast env) in let compose_lam_assum forall_let body = @@ -556,4 +558,5 @@ let core_tactic env sigma t = (Structures.vm_cast_no_check res_cast)) -let tactic () = Structures.tclTHEN Tactics.intros (Structures.mk_tactic core_tactic) +let tactic () = Structures.tclTHEN Tactics.intros (Structures.mk_tactic (core_tactic vm_cast_true)) +let tactic_no_check () = Structures.tclTHEN Tactics.intros (Structures.mk_tactic (core_tactic (fun _ -> vm_cast_true_no_check))) |