summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorn.ramanathan14 <n.ramanathan14@imperial.ac.uk>2020-09-14 18:51:38 +0000
committeroverleaf <overleaf@localhost>2020-09-14 19:09:32 +0000
commit0cd734816ad8fc58933ecc1c6a79a36903d36158 (patch)
treef2a45e714cdbf56d78fed9323c55cd6e61dc4fd0
parentb7d1d32bdb1098091498439ec2f75c78dbe0d582 (diff)
downloadfccm21_esrhls-0cd734816ad8fc58933ecc1c6a79a36903d36158.tar.gz
fccm21_esrhls-0cd734816ad8fc58933ecc1c6a79a36903d36158.zip
Update on Overleaf.
-rw-r--r--method-new.tex14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/method-new.tex b/method-new.tex
index 695a173..1e81163 100644
--- a/method-new.tex
+++ b/method-new.tex
@@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ This section describes how we conducted our testing campaign, the overall flow o
\subsection{Generating programs via CSmith}
\label{sec:method:csmith}
-\NR{
-Questions:
-\begin{itemize}
- \item Do we use Csmith's hashing or our own hashing now? Is that what \texttt{transparent\_crc} is for?
-\end{itemize}
-}
-\YH{I believe that we are now maybe using our own hashing, even though one of the bugs in Vivado was found in the Csmith hashing algorithm.. So I don't know how best to mention that.}
+% \NR{
+% Questions:
+% \begin{itemize}
+% \item Do we use Csmith's hashing or our own hashing now? Is that what \texttt{transparent\_crc} is for?
+% \end{itemize}
+% }
+% \YH{I believe that we are now maybe using our own hashing, even though one of the bugs in Vivado was found in the Csmith hashing algorithm.. So I don't know how best to mention that.}
For our testing campaign, we require a random program generator that produces C programs that are both semantically valid and feature-diverse; Csmith~\cite{yang11_findin_under_bugs_c_compil} meets both these criteria.
%Csmith is randomised code generator of C programs for compiler testing, that has found more than 400 bugs in software compilers.