diff options
| author | Yann Herklotz <git@yannherklotz.com> | 2020-09-14 22:46:32 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Yann Herklotz <git@yannherklotz.com> | 2020-09-14 22:46:32 +0100 |
| commit | a235e487ba10738c3c2d0d2c8d3ca9cf74c553ca (patch) | |
| tree | 5388d2eff907d87552629f599097d5fb27652754 | |
| parent | b8e6acf2ae98c64d4e4151eff046d50677324118 (diff) | |
| download | fccm21_esrhls-a235e487ba10738c3c2d0d2c8d3ca9cf74c553ca.tar.gz fccm21_esrhls-a235e487ba10738c3c2d0d2c8d3ca9cf74c553ca.zip | |
Add
| -rw-r--r-- | eval_rewrite.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/eval_rewrite.tex b/eval_rewrite.tex index ab855b4..4ef0fe8 100644 --- a/eval_rewrite.tex +++ b/eval_rewrite.tex @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ In addition to the explanation to bugs given in Section~\ref{sec:evaluation}, bu Firstly, there is a group of failing test cases that is constant between all versions of Vivado HLS, meaning these are bugs that were not fixed between the versions. Other ribbons can be seen weaving in and out of failing for a version, meaning these bugs were fixed or reintroduced in those versions. From the diagram it can then be seen that Vivado HLS 2018.3 contains the most failing test cases compared to the other versions, having 62 test cases fail in total. Interestingly, Vivado HLS 2019.1 and 2019.2 have a different number of failing test cases, meaning feature improvements that introduced bugs as well as bug fixes between those minor versions. + + \definecolor{ribbon1}{HTML}{8dd3c7} \definecolor{ribbon2}{HTML}{b3de69} \definecolor{ribbon3}{HTML}{bebada} |