summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/conclusion.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Wickerson <j.wickerson@imperial.ac.uk>2020-09-14 21:40:38 +0000
committeroverleaf <overleaf@localhost>2020-09-14 21:40:39 +0000
commitabe4841aa59f6c01819b166488043f77de0ecccc (patch)
tree9ba4df4dd71a23c68e484104727cd130a9e18d27 /conclusion.tex
parent7c3c18969566c0a23712928786d3239f806cfade (diff)
downloadfccm21_esrhls-abe4841aa59f6c01819b166488043f77de0ecccc.tar.gz
fccm21_esrhls-abe4841aa59f6c01819b166488043f77de0ecccc.zip
Update on Overleaf.
Diffstat (limited to 'conclusion.tex')
-rw-r--r--conclusion.tex2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/conclusion.tex b/conclusion.tex
index 872aa94..3096d52 100644
--- a/conclusion.tex
+++ b/conclusion.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
\section{Conclusion}
-We have shown how existing fuzzing tools can be modified so that their outputsare compatible with HLS tools. We then used this testing framework to run 10,000 test cases through three different HLS tools to find as many bugs in them as possible and report them to the tool vendors. In total, we found at least 6 individual and unique bugs in all the tools, which have been reduced and analysed. These consisted of crashes as well as generation of designs that did not behave in the same way as the original code.
+We have shown how existing fuzzing tools can be modified so that their outputs are compatible with HLS tools. We have used this testing framework to run 10,000 test cases \JW{check numbers} through three different HLS tools in an effort to find as many bugs in them as possible and report them to the tool vendors. In total, we found at least 6 individual and unique bugs in all the tools, which have been reduced and analysed. These consisted of crashes as well as generation of designs that did not behave in the same way as the original code.
Further work could be done on supporting more HLS tools, especially ones that prove that the output is correct before terminating. This could give an indication on how effective these proofs are, and how many times they cannot prove the output equivalent.