diff options
| author | John Wickerson <j.wickerson@imperial.ac.uk> | 2020-11-18 16:48:11 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | overleaf <overleaf@localhost> | 2020-11-18 17:00:38 +0000 |
| commit | 39f082f7e000b23f19275b5c1cf9eae0ac4d4164 (patch) | |
| tree | 4326bb9a2f172bd59f108979bed148f5a5011d20 /evaluation.tex | |
| parent | 4b223157aac969ce182c808538d002c2b207d914 (diff) | |
| download | oopsla21_fvhls-39f082f7e000b23f19275b5c1cf9eae0ac4d4164.tar.gz oopsla21_fvhls-39f082f7e000b23f19275b5c1cf9eae0ac4d4164.zip | |
Update on Overleaf.
Diffstat (limited to 'evaluation.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | evaluation.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/evaluation.tex b/evaluation.tex index 5d2034e..b5f806c 100644 --- a/evaluation.tex +++ b/evaluation.tex @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ To-do list: \end{itemize} } -Our evaluation is designed to answer the following three research questions. \JW{How about adding one more RQ at the start called `How reliable is the hardware generated by \vericert{}, and how does this compare to existing HLS tools?' Then you can answer this by saying that you couldn't break your tool using the Csmith programs generated by Du et al., which did break all the other HLS tools.} +Our evaluation is designed to answer the following three research questions. \begin{description} \item[RQ1] How fast is the hardware generated by \vericert{}, and how does this compare to existing HLS tools? \item[RQ2] How area-efficient is the hardware generated by \vericert{}, and how does this compare to existing HLS tools? |