summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/related.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'related.tex')
-rw-r--r--related.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/related.tex b/related.tex
index e0cefa3..0ab67ce 100644
--- a/related.tex
+++ b/related.tex
@@ -39,10 +39,10 @@
\node at (2.1,4.1) {\color{colorhighlevel}\strut High-level software input};
\end{tikzpicture}
- \caption{Summary of related work}\label{fig:related_venn}
+ \caption{Summary of related work}\label{fig:related_euler}
\end{figure}
-A summary of the related works can be found in Figure~\ref{fig:related_venn}, which is represented as a Venn diagram. The categories that were chosen for the Venn diagram are: if the tool is usable and available, if it takes a high-level software language as input, if it has a correctness proof and finally if that proof is mechanised. The goal of \vericert{} is to cover all of these categories.
+A summary of the related works can be found in Figure~\ref{fig:related_euler}, which is represented as an Euler diagram. The categories that were chosen for the Euler diagram are: if the tool is usable and available, if it takes a high-level software language as input, if it has a correctness proof and finally if that proof is mechanised. The goal of \vericert{} is to cover all of these categories.
Most practical HLS tools~\cite{canis11_legup,xilinx20_vivad_high_synth,intel20_sdk_openc_applic,nigam20_predic_accel_desig_time_sensit_affin_types} fit into the category of usable tools that take high-level inputs. On the other spectrum, there are tools such as BEDROC~\cite{chapman92_verif_bedroc} for which there is no practical tool, and even though it is described as high-level synthesis, it more closely resembles today's hardware synthesis tools.