summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/content/zettel/3a8g5e2.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/zettel/3a8g5e2.md')
-rw-r--r--content/zettel/3a8g5e2.md25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/zettel/3a8g5e2.md b/content/zettel/3a8g5e2.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2387f9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/zettel/3a8g5e2.md
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
++++
+title = "Double implication does not hold"
+author = "Yann Herklotz"
+tags = []
+categories = []
+backlinks = ["3a8g5e1"]
+forwardlinks = ["3a8g5g", "3a8g5e3"]
+zettelid = "3a8g5e2"
++++
+
+However, one of the downsides of eliminating these variables from the
+formulas means that the equivalence mentioned in the validation section
+([\#3a8g5g]) does not hold anymore, and one can only really prove the
+backward implication. However, maybe if the variables are also
+eliminated for the formulas from the previous predicates, then an actual
+equivalence can be shown between the two.
+
+However, this equivalence might not be useful enough though. One of the
+main problems faced with the predicates is that paths are completely
+removed and some kind of proofs on the paths need to be reinstated. This
+means that a lot of metadata needs to accompany the proof to show that
+if one formula is true, then all the other formulas must be false. This
+is the selection criteria for ɣ functions and therefore needs to hold.
+
+ [\#3a8g5g]: /zettel/3a8g5g