summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/content/zettel/3d2a.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/zettel/3d2a.md')
-rw-r--r--content/zettel/3d2a.md20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/zettel/3d2a.md b/content/zettel/3d2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d79e596
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/zettel/3d2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
++++
+title = "Validating SAT and SMT proofs"
+date = "2022-08-02"
+author = "Yann Herklotz"
+tags = []
+categories = []
+backlinks = ["3d2"]
+forwardlinks = ["3d2b"]
+zettelid = "3d2a"
++++
+
+Validating a satisfiable result is quite easy, it's just a matter of
+plugging it into the formula. However, a more difficult question is a
+proof that a result is unsatisfiable. The main idea is that if a formula
+is unsatisfiable, then it should be possible to simplify it to $\perp$.
+Therefore, one can prove unsatisfiability by producing a trace of
+rewriting rules that simplify the goal into $\perp$. If one can show
+that the rewriting rules preserve satisfiability, one can show that
+applying them will produce a $\perp$ result and therefore must be
+equivalent to $\perp$.